The government’s seemingly piecemeal dissemination of information and directives in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic has most definitely led to confusion on the part of the authorities as to how to police the new rules.
From what a F&B workers Mabel Ng wrote on her Facebook post, it would appear that essential workers are left with nowhere to have their lunch apart from the toilet!

She wrote, “Its now against the law to eat anywhere you could get caught and perhaps fined, putting all of us F and B frontliners in a tight spot when it comes to our lunch breaks.”
How is that fair?
They are out there risking their lives to provide an essential service and yet we are asking them to eat in the toilet? Why are the authorities enforcing government directives without the use of common sense?
Ng ended up having to eat her lunch in the toilet of another mall after being chased out by security when she was eating her lunch in front of her own stall!

She says that there has been some “blind implementation” of the rules. The rules are clearly to stop people from loitering unnecessarily and not to prevent people who are doing front line work from having their lunch!
This seemingly illogical means of enforcement could be in large part down to confusion as to what the rules actually entail leading authorities to err on the side of caution and throw logic to the wayside.
It is appalling and ridiculous that people who are working at essential jobs despite the outbreak of COVID-19 have nowhere to eat when we should be celebrating and praising them for their sacrifice!
This kind of policing sends out the wrong message and could end up bringing down the morale of those who still have to go out and work.
Yesterday, Ministry of Health clarified that Taxi drivers and food delivery riders can eat at public spaces or in their vehicles if it is not practical for them to head home for meals. That was days after the ban to dine in at eateries and hawker centres kicked in on the 7 April, with many stating that they did not know where to eat during their shifts. A photo showing a taxi driver eating from the back of his taxi, pained many Singaporeans who know how hard is it to drive for long hours especially now, where there is little to no customers to pick up.
To prevent further incidences of “brainless” enforcement, perhaps a government minister could speak out in praise of such essential workers and categorically state that these “no dining in” policies are meant for customers not workers!
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDA: Viral rally speech videos have no relevance to current party positioning

Singapore Demcrocatic Alliance (SDA) has come up with a press statement about…

【国会】议员倡议直播国会议事 傅海燕称现有国会资讯管道“即时、方便”

昨日(5月5日),官委议员王丽婷和工人党非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera),不约而同呼吁国会应进行直播,让民众也能理解和跟进国会针对疫情和其他重大政策的讨论。 不过,国会领袖傅海燕则指出,广播并不在此次宪法修正案的讨论事项。再者民众目前仍能以现有的方式,“即时、方便地”获取国会议事内容。 昨日国会三读通过宪法修正案,允许部分国会议员在国会外的地点,也能连线参与议事,确保疫情不会影像国会运作。不过有鉴于本地疫情渐缓,国会暂未启动相关安排。 国会直播有助民众了解国会辩论、决策过程 对此,贝理安就认为,若安排国会可在不同地点连线议事,那么肯定需安排和投资在直播的程序。如果将来这种举措还会持续,那么不妨藉此尝试直播,测试民众对国会直播的需求量如何。 他认为,直播国会会议有助民众了解国会议事、决策和辩论的过程,也能吸引民众向他们的代议士提供反馈。 这不是他首次提倡国会直播。在2017年11月她曾作出相关询问,但当时,通讯与新闻部高级政务部长徐芳达却指,国人收看国会直播的需求不大。 “消弭不对等” 至于官委议员王丽婷则指出,回溯2018年议长陈川仁也曾指出“任何发生在国会的事,都会对新加坡和国人带来影响”,故此让民众有机会看国会直播,能消弭资讯不对等、消除错误信息,以及促进更有建设性的公共讨论。 她也举例,即便跨政府部门抗疫小组的新闻发布会也是直播的,民众能够即时获取当前防疫资讯,实现信息透明和问责的领导能力。这有助增强民众对抗疫的信心。 也是文化、社区及青年部长的傅海燕,则指出宪法修正案未讨论广播的事项,再者民众目前仍能以现有的方式,“即时、方便地”获取国会议事内容。…

当了三个月志工 余振忠重返工人党竞选机器备战选举

在阻断措施期间,担任志工协助分发食物的工人党前非选区议员余振忠,重拾工人党竞选机器的工作,备战选举。 余振忠昨日(20日)在脸书上宣布上述消息,并表示自己在休假五天后,如今已恢复体力,并难掩兴奋心情。 余振忠早些时候看见了当地一个菜市场即将关闭,并出现新加坡鸡蛋过剩的情况,因此余振忠与其团队决定尽一分力,为当地农场减轻负担,目前正积极在马林百列选区的三个地点为居民派发食物。 他在文内也感谢好心人士为他的团队捐钱,该好心人士早前看见了他的宣传帖文,并留意到熟食的分配情况,因此捐钱给他们,让他们能够持续为居民购买物品。此外,余振忠也晒出志愿者送他的肉粽,他表示后肉粽就是他的美味晚餐。 他在文内也描述见到支持者的情况,有的支持者向他展示其手机内容全为工人党照片,也有支持者专门从超市为他购买酸奶,请他们喝。还有些支持者请他们吃糕点,为他们下届大选加油。 对于热情的支持者,余振忠表示非常高兴支持者能够始终记得他,虽然如今碍于疫情的影响,无法进入所有社区内,但他仍然感谢大家能够热烈欢迎他的到来。