Source: TOC

Singapore has escaped the worst of essential item shortages due to COVID-19 panic buying, according to a new report from global comparison site Finder.com.
Finder’s study of seven countries reveals that Singapore was the least likely to experience shortages of essential items like hand sanitiser, soap, fresh food, dry food, medicine, toilet paper, or other toiletries.
This is despite one in three Singaporeans, or an estimated 1.65 million people, reporting that they were unable to buy necessities.
The survey of 1,206 Singaporean adults reveals that people have been most likely to miss out on hand sanitiser, with 15% reporting that they have been unable to buy some in the past month.
Fresh food and toilet paper were also hard to come by, with 13% and 12% of respondents disclosing that they couldn’t purchase these items, respectively.
Of the countries surveyed, the Philippines faced the worst shortages, with the majority of Filipinos (58%) saying that they couldn’t purchase an essential item.
The United States and South Africa were not far behind, with 56% stating that they couldn’t purchase an item they needed.
Canada (54%), Ireland (47%), and Hong Kong (43%) also saw high volumes of shortages.
Global editor in chief at Finder, Angus Kidman, noted that it is useful for Singaporeans to see how their experience compares on a global scale.
“Despite one in three Singaporeans facing essential item shortages last month, this is the smallest percentage we saw of the seven countries surveyed,” said Mr Kidman.
“This bodes well for people’s future shopping experiences in Singapore should we experience a prolonged shutdown period, or a cycle of lockdowns that stop and start,” he added.
Read the full report here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

News of Lee Kuan Yew’s critical condition send media flocking for information

Over the past few hours, many of our Facebook timelines, Twitter feeds,…

NEA and MOH announces 15 new cases of Zika-infection, making 56 confirmed cases in total

National Environment Agency (NEA) and Ministry of Health (MOH) have announced in…

国会的角色 既是辩论最可行方案

盛港候任议员林志蔚直言,国会的角色就是去辩论最可行的政策方案。“理想情况下,国会议员选择支持或反对某政策,将选区选民和全国的利益作整体考量。” 政策依据整体的优劣,固然“魔鬼藏在细节里”,制定政策者某种程度上该去盘点这些细节,但也要充分理解较广泛的考量因素,如对预算财案的潜在影响、整体社会经济的影响等。 林志蔚曾在世界银行工作七年,也曾参与不同经济体(不管是民主或较不民主政体)的政策制定,对于民主政策决策有感而发,在脸书表达个人看法。 拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士资历,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 林志蔚也在近期获委新加坡经济学会公布最新理事会成员。坊间期许更多在野党议员入国会, 能激起更诚挚的辩论,但如果国会没有足够的在野党声音,这样的辩论根本不会出现。 他指出,由大多数人(或大多数代议士)制定的决策(不论好坏)都会在全民之间落实,在此前必然需经过一番辩论,但若通过成为法律,全民只能遵守。而如果法律仅是针对特定群体,亦是缺乏民主和歧视性的,当然针对性的法律,例如妇女产假、最低薪金制等则属例外。 不过决策者需谨慎非自愿排斥或包容的风险,带来偏驳或差别待遇的看法,有别于原子或化学,若人们知道政策怎么对待他们,人是会改变他们的态度的。 国会的角色,正是去辩论最可行的方案;较精细的细节可以交给有能力且非政治性的官僚,将笼统的转化为更具体和实用的事物。在好些民主政体,通常都是公共体系的高层随着换政府更迭。 林志蔚也提醒,评估的黄金标准固然是做实验,但是要这么去对国家政策做实验显然不切实际,那就反倒把人们都当成白老鼠了。所幸统计科学之进步,使得人们可以用较不侵害权益的方式来进行评估。 “现代化的公共服务,理应有擅长此法的专业人士服务。理想上还应进行独立的评鉴(例如学术机构),而这亦需要出于公共利益的数据共享。” 那么政策有没有效的评估,就反映给国会,来决定有关政策是否还值得进行下去,或哪些部分可能失败。

李函轩中暑身亡案 上尉被控行为鲁莽罪

国民服役人员李函轩中暑身亡案,警方今早把涉案的一名上尉军官,以行为鲁莽罪控上法庭。 被告陈宝树(30岁)案发时是李函轩的长官,他面对一项行为鲁莽导致他人死亡控狀。一旦罪成将被监禁长达五年,或罚款,或两者兼施。 19岁的第一精卫营士兵李函轩,在4月18日参加八公里快步行军后,出现热损伤(heat injury)症状。虽然当场接受降温急救并送院治疗,但经12天抢救后回天乏术,于4月30日在樟宜综合医院过世。 陈宝树是上述快步行军的负责长官,被控在4月18日8.25分至9.10分期间,无法及时判断李函轩的状况,并为他安排有效的治疗。 此外,还有其余六名服役军人被指涉案,正接受国防部的调查。在文告中,国防部表示将暂缓内部审讯,直至陈宝树的刑事诉讼结束。 文告补充如内部调查发现上述六名军人有罪,将依据《武装部队法令》,从施以罚款、拘留或降级等惩罚。 “武装部队认真看待军人的人身安全,如有军人违反军令、故意或疏忽训练安全守则,将依军法在即决审判(Summary trial)普通军事法庭审判并严惩,或在民事法庭下严审并起诉。” 11月28日过堂 被告陈宝树的代表律师向法庭申请四周休庭,案件展延至11月28日过堂,被告以1万元保释。 根据今年8月7日,国防部长黄永宏在国会发布的调查委员会调查结果,李函轩所属单位在事发前玩,在一项体能训练违反《安全训练守则》,没有让士兵获取足够睡眠。…