Now that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said that Cabinet ministers have started wearing face masks, it is inevitable that we will see Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing donning one.
It will mark a spectacular U-turn for the plainspoken tough talking minister. What a sight to see him ditch his Superman cape for the Batman mask. It just shows that if you are prepared to mock politicians from another country, you’ve got to be prepared to have egg on your face.
From U-turns to doublespeak, there have been times when we are led to scratch our heads during this pandemic.
The question of mask-wearing has befuddled many for weeks. Before arriving at the current stance, Assoc Prof Kenneth Mak, Director of Medical Services at the Ministry of Health, advised that “wearing a mask is not the most important thing.” Which is like saying that gargling your mouth is not the most important thing.
To confound the issue, a Ministry of Health advisory stated: “Coronovirus: cleaning your phone more effective than a face mask.” Can anybody tell the correlation between the two?
A few weeks ago, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong declared that Singapore’s aim was to achieve “the impossible.” This meant slowing the spread of the coronavirus while avoiding the long-term impact of the pandemic.
A great big head-scratcher, that one. Why would anyone in their right mind want to attempt to achieve “the impossible”, especially during such a major crisis? Sounds like a pipe dream and an exercise in futility, which it has turned out to be in double quick time.
Coming under intense pressure to close schools, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung said with conviction that it couldn’t be done because “if we close schools, many will not stay home, but may run around in the community and mingle with a lot more people, exposing themselves to more risk.”
Barely days later, he announced with a straight face that it was the right time to close schools. A U-turn without the blink of an eye.
The one that has been going round and round over the past week is this thing about “circuit breaker” to stem the spread of COVID-19. It’s all over the place, many, many times a day – we hear it from the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, multiple ministers and TV newscasters, we read it in the papers daily.
Will the straight-talking Chan Chun Sing (aka Batman) explain why we die die must say circuit breaker when other countries call it lockdown?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Efficiency doesn’t mean do things fast for the sake of it – it means doing things in a proper, effective and organised manner. 

There seems to be a trigger happy trend in Singapore. Act first…

Chan talks about team S’pore comprising SGs, PRs and FTs while NSF PTE Quek remains in ICU

Yesterday in Parliament (6 Jan), Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing…

Utterly absurd that Jolovan Wham was penalised so heavily for peaceful acts of civil disobedience

by Teo Soh Lung I was in the spanking new state of…

Don’t expect the PAP to change their playbook

In his recent opinion piece, Augustine Low criticizes the People’s Action Party (PAP) for sticking to their old playbook and failing to bring about change and reinvention. Despite all the talk of change, the PAP cannot bring itself to ditch the playbook that it has relied on for decades. Low argues that the PAP preys on insecurity, vulnerability, and division, and promulgates the idea that it is indispensable to a glorious one-party system. Low highlights Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s speech in which he outlined various “storms” that Singapore faces, calling it out of sorts messaging. PM Lee called on Singaporeans to stay united as one people, which really meant to unite as one behind the PAP. The Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong stuck to the playbook as well, warning that the PAP might not win the next election and taking a potshot at the opposition. Low argues that those who still hope for change from the PAP are hoping in vain. The onus is on the people to change, and as long as they keep giving the PAP their parliamentary supermajority, the PAP sees no need to change. Low believes that it is time for the people to take responsibility and change the status quo.