In Parliament yesterday (7 Apr), responding to Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh, Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat continued to decline to disclose the size of Singapore’s reserves, which technically belong to Singaporeans. He told Mr Singh that it is a matter of national security and cannot be disclosed.
Heng said that these funds serve as a “strategic defence” to protect the Singapore dollar from speculative attacks and bolster the confidence of investors and citizens. “No country’s armed forces will ever tell you exactly how much ammunition and weaponry they really have,” he said.
“To do so is to betray valuable intelligence to potential adversaries. This is obviously not a wise defence strategy, and likewise should not be adopted for our financial reserves.”
He said that the reserves are vital to Singapore’s overall economic and financial stability. “It is neither in the interest of Singapore or Singaporeans to repeatedly ask about the size of our reserves. We are in the middle of a storm, and I am very disappointed that Mr Pritam Singh has used this occasion to raise this question again.”
In response, Mr Singh said the WP seeks figures on the reserves because “when the Government introduces policies where reserves have to be employed, the question we have to ask ourselves is: Is it enough, or is it too much… or is it too little?”.
That is to say, Mr Singh wanted to know the amount of government’s draw down from the reserves for funding the present COVID-19 crisis, relative to the total size of the reserves. In this way, Singaporeans would know if the country could afford such funding or perhaps it could afford to even fund more to help more Singaporeans in the present crisis.
Heng, instead, chose to reply saying that the current system was rigorously designed, and provided checks and balances. He said President Halimah has asked “good questions” when the government sought twice to draw up to $21 billion from the reserves to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.
“I spent a lot of time explaining the details. And I can tell you that the President and CPA (Council of Presidential Advisers) asked very good questions,” he said.
“I am extremely grateful that we have been able to tap the deep financial reserves – our current and past reserves which have been so carefully built up, invested and managed. This has allowed us to respond to the crisis without having to borrow, and without burdening our future generations with repayment obligations.”
Singapore’s reserves consist of assets invested by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Temasek and GIC. While MAS and Temasek disclose the sum of the funds they invest, those invested by GIC are not. Currently, MAS has about $396 billion in foreign assets, while Temasek’s current portfolio is valued at $313 billion, according to latest figures.
Even though the full size of the reserves is not revealed, it has been estimated by analysts to be at least over $1 trillion.
Norway reveals size of its sovereign wealth fund as well as actual earnings
Meanwhile, it was reported in Feb that Norway’s sovereign wealth fund made a 19.9% return on investment last year, earning a record 1.69 trillion Norwegian crowns (US$180 billion).
Norway has always communicated the size of its reserves transparently to its people. In fact, it publishes the size of its reserves in the oil fund on its website in real time as its asset prices, including shares’ and bonds’, fluctuate by the seconds:

In this way, Norwegians can assess for themselves if their government has been a good steward of their country’s monies. Somehow, they are not afraid of any currency speculative attacks by disclosing the size of their reserves, unlike the Singapore’s PAP government.
In any case, the Norwegian US$1.1 trillion fund’s return for last year was stronger than that of its benchmark index. “2019 has been a very good year for the fund … this is the greatest increase in value in a single year in the fund’s history,” said Norwegian central bank Governor Oeystein Olsen, who chairs the fund’s board.
Last year’s fantastic return on investment amounted to almost US$34,000 for each of its 5.3 million people living in Norway, and the overall value of the fund is now equivalent to about US$207,000 for every Norwegian citizens. The fund’s returns help to provide vital funding for the country’s extensive social welfare programmes.
The CEO of the fund, Yngve Slyngstad, commented that Norway had moved from being “an oil nation to an oil fund nation”. He added that Norway now received more money in government coffers from the fund rather than oil in the North Sea.
“This is the second chapter. I think the first chapter was taking oil from the North Sea, and we executed that in a reasonably prudent fashion. Now it’s the second leg, and that is trying to manage those funds as smoothly as possible and so far it’s been quite adequately executed as well,” he said.
During Slyngstad’s tenure, the fund’s assets have increased five-fold.
Norwegians understand that the government is elected by the people to be the caretaker of the country and its assets. They also understand that if the government didn’t do its job properly, they are obliged to choose a different caretaker to take over. And to assess whether a government is managing its country’s resources well, information needs to be transparent.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former police officer pleads guilty to taking $35,000 in bribes to help alleged molester avoid being charged

A 29-year-old policeman, Staff Sergeant Woo Poh Liang admitted to receiving $35,000…

Dr Tony Tan lunchtime rally photos

Photos by Shawn Danker

害怕失业被遣返回国 大部分女佣难拒绝“额外工作”

虽然清楚了解自己的权利和工作准则及合约规定,但是许多外籍女佣仍在被强迫进行“额外”工作时,不敢拒绝雇主,更别说向人力部或相关单位投报。 本地数家非政府组织在接受《亚洲新闻台》访问时指出,外籍女佣清楚了解自己的权利、工作准证和合约规定的工作,但是在面对雇主要求做出准证以外的工作时,她们就算知道不该,却也不敢拒绝或投诉。 受访组织包括有情义之家(HOME)、外籍女佣援助与技能培训协会(FAST)和新加坡劳务中介协会(AEAS)。 FAST协会高级执行员Seira Ong指出,协会每月会接到月200至300通投诉电话,比疫情前的投诉电话多了一倍多,有近三成被转介到人力部。而该协会所接到的求助电话中,有低于两成是和额外工作或工作量过多至无法应付有关。 她指出,较多女佣在被迫进行“额外工作”时不敢拒绝雇主,因为担心会被雇主认为他们是在偷懒,而不敢拨电投诉或求救,则是怕会被遣返回国,尤其是在受到疫情影响的现在,要回到我国觅职就更加难了。 而情义之家的个案经理Jaya Anil Kumar也有同样的答案,即女佣害怕在做出投诉后会失去工作,或者自己反成为被调查的一方。 “向情义之家求助的女佣中,每四人中就有一人表示曾到住家以外的地点,或被载到雇主的公司工作,但是只有小部分案件交给人力部调查。当局多年来都接到相当数量的投诉案件。” 工作界线模糊 AEAS主席K…

Does the newly introduced subsidiary legislation address concerns surrounding POFMA?

The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019 (POFMA) is officially…