Workers’ Party’s Member of Parliament (MP) for Hougang SMC Png Eng Huat called on the Government to use funds from Singapore’s reserves to save jobs first, instead of using it to “rescue corporate executives of large companies who did little or no planning to save for a rainy day” nor to protect fat dividends or share buyback schemes for listed companies.
In Parliament on Monday (6 April), MP Png asked how the Government will ensure that the nation’s reserves are channeled to save jobs, especially for those in the aviation industry as the sector would receive a major share from the reserve money.
“The Deputy Prime Minister had said the S$17 billion from the reserves will be used to help fund measures like supporting jobs, helping the self-employed and boosting the hard-hit aviation sector,” he noted. “So the use of our reserves must save jobs, first and foremost.”
MP Png stressed that funds from the reserves should not be used to “rescue corporate executives of large companies who did little or no planning to save for a rainy day, and will continue to receive fat salaries while their companies bleed”.
“It must also not be used to protect fat dividends or share buyback schemes for listed companies to appease their shareholders once the crisis blows over,” he added.
In referring to the public funds that would be used to co-pay a large portion of the employers’ staff salaries, MP Png asked whether there are any conditions imposed on the big companies, such as holding off retrenchment exercises for as long as they receiving help from the government.
“And for listed companies, would there be a temporary moratorium on the payment of dividends or share buyback exercise once the assistance is no longer needed?” he asked.
Noting that he supports the measures to save jobs and the livelihoods of many self-employed Singaporeans in the supplementary budget, MP Png asked if the employees who were assigned to go on no-pay leave will receive any help to pay their bills.
“Would they be receiving any help as well as there are bills to pay and mouths to feed? These workers would include retail staff, childcare centre cooks, coffee shop helpers, office cleaners, and the list goes on,” he questioned.
MP Png spoke in Parliament about a resident who runs an employment agency by himself has had his livelihood vanished overnight, and some Singaporean freelancers do not have receipts and Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions to prove their livelihood status.
On that note, he sought clarifications on whether the Government will allocate funds to help those who are self-employed and freelancers.
Following the closure of non-essential workplaces and schools, MP Png said utility usage for households is expected to increase now that Singaporeans are working from home via telecommuting, and students have switched to full home-based learning.
Thus, he asked in Parliament whether the U-save rebates were adequately measured to assist Singaporeans in covering the impending increase in utility charges under the latest stay-at-home orders.
“Many affected residents I spoke to the past two days asked when can the help arrive? Some help measures will only come in May or later but many affected Singaporeans were already struggling to make ends meet since February,” MP Png noted.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

本地专才失业四月觅职未果! 邱宝忠冀政府检视招聘政策

虽然我国在官方和MyCareersFuture.sg等招聘网站上,有成千上万份就职空缺,但是真实情况却不一定令人乐观,新加坡前进党成员邱宝忠,以一名顶尖大学毕业生James的真实经历为例,促请我国政府重检聘请外国专才政策。 邱宝忠今日(9月14日)在脸书帖文指出,我国拥有很多才华横溢的PMET人才,但如今他们也面对艰难处境,而James就是其中一个例子。 James曾在新加坡国立大学担任高级管理职务,并获得大学荣誉学位,属世界顶尖大学内表现优异的应届毕业生,也肯定有履行国民服役。 “据我估计,他的薪金应在8000元到1万元之间,但可悲的是,他甚至无法获得4至5千元的工作。” James是其中一名受到疫情影响而失业的人士之一。他在《今日报》分享了他的经历,并且持续面对挑战前进的动力。他于42岁重返校园。James在处理国际市场的公共教育领域工作了18年,曾为四名雇主打拼,以及在国内外从事营销行业。 他于2016年,因家庭关系返回狮城,并于今年初,加入了规模较小的国际公司分行,负责领导这里的团队发展亚洲业务。 然而不巧因疫情影响,雇主于今年5月底解雇了整个新加入的分行团队,包括他在内。 经过四个月觅职,他申请超过80个职位,甚至连以前工作岗位的最初级职务都申请了。然而招聘人员对他说,“世界已经改变了,James,你可以减薪一半吗?”。担任高位的招聘员指出,他比客户所期待的来的“有经验多了”。 他之后听取朋友和伙伴的建议,通过Linkedln和有可能聘请的雇主直接接触,或开拓自己的交流网,也有很多人表示乐意为他做介绍,但是四个月来都没有接获过任何面试交流。 这种种甚至让他觉得离开狮城10年是个错误,因为有不少雇主就因为这样而拉低他的评估。然而他最后决定继续留在本地觅职。 他卖掉自己的屋子,以便能够抚养年届八旬的老父母,并到商业学院报名,攻读工商管理硕士学位。 外国人才职务无人能替代?…

Sayoni Queer Women Survey

Take part in this survey for queer women in S’pore.

【2020财政预算案】前进党:应助百姓纾困应对疫情 正视外籍客工对就业市场影响

昨日(18日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰在国会公布2020年财政预算案。 新加坡前进党此前已建议落实扩张性预算案,提升经济和就业机会;提供短期财政援助纾困,同时反对调涨消费税。 对此该党针对政府的财案发表看法,先是感谢政府聆听该党和民间各造的意见,赞许额外拨款8亿元供前线医务人员抗疫的举措。 助理秘书长梁文辉则认为,面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)的冲击下,老百姓家户也应获得额外的纾困减轻负担,因此提出比起现有政府拨款16亿元“关怀与援助配套”相比,应该还能做得更好。 “我们建议至少为本地家户拨款10至20亿元,以协助老百姓应对经济下行和疫情面对的困境。” 该党也强调,财案不应是糖果袋,反之应该是长期性的规划,而不是短期或临时性的财政发放。然而该党认为政府的财案以不同形式的“糖果”派发,也很难让人民理解如何能从中受惠,也缺乏对振兴经济信心的成效。 “经济过于依赖外籍客工” 再者,前进党提醒从疫情的爆发,也可见我国企业和经济面对的一项问题:过于依赖外籍客工。其中这也部分是因为生育率低下造成的,“故此我们应该重新审视,透过提升生育率来增加本地劳动力的更强有力政策” 尽管王瑞杰宣布明年将不会调涨消费税,不过前进党强调该党反对考量当前局势,未来五年都不建议调涨消费税或其他费用。有鉴于政府未言明调涨消费税的时间点(仅表示2025年需调涨),为此该党也质疑政府推出60亿元援助配套的合理性。 “再者,此前政府一再强调调涨消费税之必要。然而如今又得以基于经济困境暂缓,还能拨出逾60亿元的援助配套,且不需动用储备金”。这使得该党质疑未来是否还有调整消费税的理据。 另一方面,政府宣布将S准证持有者比率分两阶段进行调整。从明年1月起,先把顶限调低到18巴仙。到2023年1月,再调低到15巴仙。 正视外籍客工构成职场竞争…

英相“放任式防疫”反其道而行? 英国民众吓到不敢出门

武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情肆虐全球,各国对于抗疫过程也绷紧神经,丝毫不敢松懈,采取颜值控管出入境、限制边境、甚至封国封城防疫,然而在英国却选择另类的防疫方式,一开始开启“放任式防疫”,即只有症状严重者才需要做筛检,不再计算感染人数,也不禁止大型集会活动,随即引起各界批评。 直到两天前(16日),英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊才肯呼吁当地民众,减少非必要外出和与人接触;昨天宣布英国需像“战时政府”一样应对疫情,以及公布经济纾困计划。 目前英国已知确诊病例超过1960例,死亡人数60人。而当局以武汉冠病死亡率仅1巴仙为由,使用的“群体免疫”策略也引来医学界炮轰,但相信此举有助缓解因果医疗系统压力。 然而,在这样“放任式的防疫”下,有居住在英国的网友观察发现,这样的方式可能对英国民众反而凑效。 网友表示,他是从台湾搬到英国,所以也在观察两国的防疫设施,他发现两国的防疫措施上采取截然不同的方式。 对于台湾而言,在疫情开始时便积极准备,步步紧盯,对于每一例都紧密追踪,所以在过去两个与内,其防疫控管做得滴水不漏。 英国不停课、各行业照常营运、不检测 反观英国,在过去几周内确诊病例突然激增,却开始选择不作为的形式来选择防疫,即不取消任何聚会活动、不停课停班、各行各业照常营运、不做检测停止计算感染人数、生病自己在家休息不要到医院也不用通报的方式。 此言一出,也引发了英国陷入大恐慌,也掀起当地的抢购潮。 虽然招来很多的斥责但网友却表示,对于“耳朵一向很硬”,嘴里不停说该来的就会来、keep calm &…