Dr Tan Cheng Bock has been compared with Dr Mahathir Mohamad. But the one he more closely resembles – in spirit and in destiny – is Anwar Ibrahim.

Anwar has come so near yet so far many times. His highest political aspirations have been cruelly foiled time and again through injustice and betrayal.

Dr Tan came to within a whisker of winning the presidency in 2011, losing by only 0.34% of the votes to Tony Tan.

Had the two other Tans not contested, he would most certainly have won. A heartbreaking defeat that should never have been.

After six long years, Dr Tan was widely seen as a favourite to capture the presidency in 2017. But changes were made to reserve the elected presidency for minorities only. And just like that, his presidential aspirations turned into ashes. Dr Tan contested the legitimacy of the changes – but unsuccessfully. He went from favourite to non-starter in the election.

Undaunted, Dr Tan formed the Progress Singapore Party. He has been raring for a go at the general election, aiming to lead a GRC team to victory. Then the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Sensing opportunity, the People’s Action Party has signalled that it could call an election even amidst the pandemic.

Will a pandemic general election kill off Dr Tan’s chances of victory and deny him a third time?

There are those who say it’s not a done deal  – we don’t really know which way Singaporeans will vote in a crisis.

For a clue, just look at what’s happening in the United States. President Donald Trump and his administration are widely seen as inept and have badly mismanaged the COVID-19 outbreak. Still, latest polling shows that Trump’s approval ratings have gone up. Americans are like people anywhere else – in times of crisis, they choose to rally round their leaders. Very few want to rock the boat amid a crisis and the opposition risks becoming irrelevant.

Dr Tan has been making spirited and cogent arguments against a pandemic general election. He has rightly warned of the dangers of exposing more than 2.6 million voters to a health crisis. But his proposal for a caretaker government has been dismissed by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, who called it unconstitutional, misleading and unhelpful. Doesn’t that tell us which way the wind is blowing?

Still, it is the people who have the ultimate say. Pandemic election or not, can Singaporeans find it in themselves to stop the lightning bolt from striking Dr Tan a third time?

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mainstream media going along with Government’s stance of holding general election without questioning why

It has been taken as a given that the general election in…

Shanmugam singled out Goh Keng Swee and Hon Sui Sen for living in black-and-white bungalows too

In his piece, Augustine Low challenges Law Minister K Shanmugam’s comparison of modern ministers’ accommodation to those of Singapore’s past, questioning its relevance given the stark changes in ministers’ salaries and perks.

PM Lee’s troubling decision: The reappointment and maintenance of Tan Chuan-Jin as Speaker despite knowledge of his affair

Opinion: The recent resignation of Speaker Tan Chuan-Jin, after revelations of an extra-marital affair, has forced Singapore into a state of political introspection. More critically, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s decision to reappoint and maintain Mr Tan in a position of authority, despite knowledge of the affair, has profound implications for Singapore’s political landscape. Could there be instances where individuals are appointed to positions of authority, despite knowledge of their personal indiscretions, potentially subjecting them to undue influence?

Divorced – and facing housing woes

Leong Sze Hian Mr Tan (not his real name) came to see…