Teo Soh Lung in 2013 (Photo – Choon Hiong)

Lawyer and former ISA detainee Teo Soh Lung criticized mainstream media for giving the wrong impression to readers about the parliamentary debate on Wednesday (25 March) and indicated Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean’s explanations on the caretaker government as ‘talking nonsense’.

During the parliament on Wednesday, Mr Teo said it would be unconstitutional for the government to delay elections in the absence of a state of emergency and remarked the suggestion to form a caretaker government “shows a disregard for or a lack of understanding of the Constitution”.

Mr Teo said that in response to a question from Christopher de Souza, Holland-Bukit Timah GRC Member of Parliament (MP) on the Government’s stance regarding a proposal mooted by former presidential candidate and current Progress Singapore Party chief Tan Cheng Bock.

Dr Tan had suggested forming a caretaker government in the event if the COVID-19 situation in Singapore does not ease by April 2021.

“To suggest this shows a disregard for or a lack of understanding of the Constitution. Putting forward constitutionally unworkable proposals at a time of serious national crisis can only confuse and mislead Singaporeans to the detriment of Singapore and Singaporeans,” Mr Teo noted.

Following the parliament debate, lawyer Ms Teo took to Facebook earlier today (27 March) stating that the mainstream media had given people the wrong impression about the question raised by MP de Souza on the government’s stance on Dr Tan’s suggestion.

“I think it is dishonest and disgraceful for the mainstream media to cover a parliamentary debate in a manner that leaves people like me with a wrong impression. It should either report the question and answer fully or omit it completely,” Ms Teo wrote.

She added, “It should check a doubtful question, in this instance, the question raised by de Souza with the source i.e. Dr Tan himself.”

A number of reports from the mainstream media did not explain in detail what was Dr Tan’s actual suggestion made earlier on 21 March. Dr Tan had suggested in a Facebook video that the President could exercise her soft power to form a caretaker government comprising some of the current MPs and subsequently call for fresh elections when the COVID-19 crisis is resolved if the pandemic is dragged beyond 14 April 2021.

In view of that, Ms Teo urged people to look for alternative news and be cautioned of what is written on the mainstream media.

Meanwhile, she opined that the question raised by MP de Souza was to let Mr Teo to ‘belittle’ and accuse Dr Tan of ‘misleading people’, and enabled him to speak at length about the caretaker government.

“The misleading question (or misleading report) of MP de Souza also enabled the minister to give a long lecture on the Constitution, as if the PAP has any high regard for this document,” she asserted, adding that the PAP would not have amended the constitution so freely and frequently if the party has any regard for it.

She indicated Mr Teo’s explanation on the caretaker government as “talking nonsense” as the PAP has a supermajority in parliament to make laws.

“Minister Teo is really talking nonsense when he elaborates on caretaker governments. With the PAP super majority in parliament, it can make laws in a matter of hours or minutes and at its whims and fancies,” she said.

Ms Teo added, “There will never be a need for a caretaker government, at least not in my lifetime.”

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and the surging number of infected cases in Singapore, Ms Teo said the senior minister still wants to hold a general election and gain a ‘clear mandate’ from the people.

“In other words, it does not want us, the people to criticise its work and the measures it takes to control the disease. It does not care about adding more burden to our overworked health care workers. It does not care about our well being,” she wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Citizens ready for a Singapore that treats all her citizens equally – or not

If there’s one thing every student can take away from years of…

每月可免费领12样食品 善粮社让清寒家庭有尊严选择食物

疫情爆发后,曾一度出现抢购潮和囤积粮食的现象,导致许多有需要的人反而无法获得,尤其是老年人。然而,有社区商店体恤年长者,让他们每月可领取12样免费食物,无需到超市与他人抢购。 近日网络平台The Pride报导,该店是由慈善组织善粮社(Food From the Home ,简称FFTH)所经营,位于麦克佛森与蒙巴登区域,至少为500户贫困家庭提供免费食物,每家店均有一位FFTH的志愿者驻守。 志愿者潘小姐(译音)在接受采访时表示,在工作的过程中,往往与受益人互动令她打开眼界。她说,基本上入店的受益人都带着感恩的心,而且也愿意和志愿者分享自己的近况。 “尽管他们可能会每月拿12样东西,但大部分仍相当贴心,并告知我他们只会拿自己需要的。” 另名志愿者则认为,通常出现囤货的情况,都会以最昂贵的物品为主,但店里并不会发生这些情况。 善粮社首席执行长沈美霞认为将商店放在离受益人的社区内相当重要,除了能够让他们方便到店,也可以让受益人和志愿者建立关系,能够为他们以后提供更多协助。 沈美霞也指出,一些受益人会碍于社会的偏见,而对于食物的选择也相当警惕,因此能够让他们自由选择自己想要的食物,让受益人获得抉择权,他们会更放心食用。…

口罩政策U转 显现政府决策的缺陷

尽管新加坡政府在疫情爆发初阶,其检测被国际誉为“黄金标准”,但因对疫情采取“反应性”的预防措施而遭许多人抨击,包括较为争议的戴口罩立场。 在短时间内犹如经历“大风吹”转变,从建议身体不适才戴口罩,到不再劝导不戴口罩,最后强制戴口罩,甚至不惜对不带口罩者处以罚款的重罚。 总理李显龙于今年1月份时还向媒体透露,根据医生的建议,民众无需长时间戴口罩出门。 “这毫无帮助,事实上反而会出现适得其反的情况,因为他会制造毫无意义的安全感。你会认为你是安全,但其实你的手和口罩都是肮脏的,你会碰到口罩当摘下的时候,这也会促进感染。” 此番言论也获得主流媒体的支持,《海峡时报》于2月份时曾报道,卫生部医药服务总监麦锡威副教授,反驳新加坡四名医生的公开信。 四名医生呼吁公众应该出门戴口罩,减少感染风险,与此同时信内也呼吁公众应该勤于洗手和减少不必要社交。 医生也强调,戴口罩总比不戴口罩来得更好。当两人近距离接触时戴上口罩能够形成双向保护,避免将病毒传染到对方身上。 然而麦锡威则指出,在控制冠状病毒19时,“如今戴口罩并非是最重要的事情,反而是要留意经常接触的东西”,意味着戴口罩比保持良好的卫生习惯来得更不重要。 今年3月,国际两名医学专家认为戴口罩相当重要,有助于减低病毒传染,与世界卫生组织(WHO)的报告相违。 中国疾病预防控制中心主任高福接受《科学》杂志的采访时也透露,在疫情期间不戴上口罩,反而是错误的选择。 “病毒是通过飞沫和密切接触传染,因此飞沫是值得关注的,当你在说话时,飞沫会从嘴巴出来,所以必须戴上口罩。” “而且许多人是无症状感染,如果他们能够戴上口罩,就可以防止带有病毒的飞沫从嘴巴喷出,传染到别人身上。”…

感叹机场空荡荡反差大 毕丹星冀早日恢复昔日热闹光景

毕丹星感叹樟宜机场空空荡荡,期待机场能够恢复昔日热闹繁华的场景。 工人党秘书长毕丹星,于29日在脸书上发文表示,自己在周末时段带着女儿前往樟宜机场,感叹机场在疫情下显得冷清清的情况。 他坦言自己一直对航空业非常感兴趣,忆述儿时母亲带着他和姐姐前往樟宜机场的场景,同时见证了樟宜机场的发展。 “1981年樟宜机场开业时,我母亲带着5岁的我和7岁的姐姐到樟宜机场附近。仅仅几年内,还曾搭乘伊留申-62客机,前往新德里探访祖父母。 看着昔日水泄不通的机场,变成如今只有寥寥无几的旅客,他感叹,对于飞机的起降仍记忆犹新,宛如近日才发生,然而如今跑道却已被关闭。于是他也带着女儿开始逛机场。 “我们在享用完了冰淇淋后,从星耀樟宜开始逛,第一航厦到人烟稀少的第三航厦,那种体验让人感到不真实/” 他也用手机记录下眼前的景象,拍下这历史性的一刻。毕丹星在文末也补充,希望能够很快回到这里,看见截然不同的场景。