Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) member, Bryan Lim Boon Heng took to Facebook yesterday (19 March) to respond to a Straits Times (ST) article titled “The merits of holding a GE during an outbreak” which was published online earlier today (20 March).

In that opinion piece, the editor of Chinese Media Group’s NewsHub Han Yong May said, “The present moment, seemingly fraught with danger, might also present the best opportunity for an election.”

Referring to this, Mr Lim wrote on his Facebook, “13,12,14,17,23,47 and 32. No, these are not the winning Toto numbers. These are the daily number of positive Covid-19 cases reported since electoral boundaries were announced.

“But look at what I saw online before we kickstarted our house visits tonight. This is the headline which you will see in one of the mainstream print media tomorrow (see attached screenshot).”

Mr Lim then questioned ST’s decision to publish such an article, describing it as “shocking”. 

He said “Shocking, isn’t it? Which honorable media in the world will trumpet about the merits of holding an election in an outbreak, other than one which only advocates & answers to the egotistical course of its political masters?”.

Concerns that the government might decide to call for elections during this outbreak was raised after the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) released its report of the revised boundaries last week. Historically, elections are called within months of the report’s release.

Mr Lim said in his post, “No amount of merits can outweigh the one insurmountable demerit- & that is exposing the public to the risk of cross infection.”

Despite the sharp spike in cases, it seems that the PAP is still hanging on to the rhetoric that polls should be called soon,” he added. 

Mr Lim is echoing the sentiments of many other opposition politicians who have come forward to voice their concerns over the government hinting that the elections would be held soon despite the outbreak and describing it as ‘irresponsible’ to not rule out elections for now.

The SDP member went on to urge to Singaporeans to “sit up & take notice this time round”.

He said, “You may have chosen to turn a blind eye or stay ignorant on the issues of the GST hike, 10 million population & non-return of your CPF savings in full during the current pandemic.”

“But you cannot possibly stay oblivious when the PAP seems bent on steamrolling ahead with a snap election to gratify its political thirst- at the very expense of your personal health.”

Mr Lim concluded, “Election or no election, you need to send a clear & dignified message to the PAP that your health is in your hands. Not theirs to play a fool with- like what they have done to your cost of living, jobs & retirement savings.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

British expat released from jail, a recruiter hired by international HR firm PageGroup

It was reported that British national Benjamin Glynn was released from jail…

Workers’ Party candidate Dr Daniel Goh files police report against poison letter

Workers’ Party candidate Dr Daniel Goh has made a police report on…

助男友放贷落网 女菲佣认罪囚14周

女菲佣协助放高利贷的爱人贷款给在本地当女佣的同乡,并收取20巴仙的利息,结果两人被逮捕,并在昨日面控时认罪,被判入狱八周并罚款6万元,但因无力付款,所以以六周代替。 45岁的女菲佣雪莉(译音)面对八项抵触放贷人法令和协助非法房贷的控状,她认罪后表示无力支付罚款,所以法官就以六周监刑来代替。 已在我国工作了11年的她,结识了60岁男子陈文德(译音),两人成为了男女朋友。 据法庭案情指出,陈文德是在2017年7月自其菲律宾友人处接手放贷生意。当时因为还有六七名在本地工作的女佣债款还没收到,陈文德就支付了2000元以“买断”生意。 他随后扩展放贷业务,并专门在乌节路的幸运商业中心“营业”,借贷对象多是菲律宾女佣,且必须收到对方的工作准证和护照复印本后才借钱。 雪莉和陈文德自2012年开始交往,她在2017年知道陈文德经营放贷生意后,就会在休假时陪男友到幸运商业中心放贷。她有时会帮助男友放贷和收债,有时会帮忙把风。 陈文德每次放贷款额不超过500元,利息为20巴仙,以致每名借了500元的借贷人,其实只拿到400元,剩余的100元被当做第一期期款。如果借贷人无法归还全数金额,那么他必须每月偿还100元。 大部分女佣都无法做到全数偿还,因此每月都必须偿还100元。有的甚至从2017年7月开始每月偿还100元至今,仍未还清债务。 不知已触犯法律 从2017年7月开始至今年4月,雪莉帮助陈文德借出了500元给一名同乡,也向七名同乡收取100元期款。 警方于今年5月12日在幸运商业中心将两人逮捕,陈文德也被控上法庭,案件还在处理。 古达律师指出,雪莉是基于和陈文德的关系,所以才帮助他,而且雪莉从来没有自陈文德处获得酬劳。…

Three-quarter tank rule expanded to cover Singapore-registered diesel-powered vehicles leaving Singapore to Malaysia via land checkpoints

Singapore Customs stated in a press release on Wednesday (2 January) that…