Connect with us

Current Affairs

雇员控诉公司歧视聘雇 人力部澄清:“并非事实真相”

Published

on

日前一名员工在网路上控诉公司以外国人才取代她,随后向人力部寻求协助无果的故事引起网民的关注,人力部于14日发表声明澄清并非“事件的真相”,同时她称劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)未跟进案件并未属实。

此事由维权人士吴家和于3月6日在脸书所转载,随后由本社英语站报导。该名化名“劳拉”的女士,声称其公司欲聘请来自香港的外国人才,以此取代她的职位。随后她找上人力部,但被转介到劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟。

她表示,自己也听从人力部的指示,立即联系TAFEP。然而等到她寻求国务资政张志贤和人力部长杨莉明帮助、且威胁公开此事,TAFEP才给予她回应。

TAFEP联系劳拉并给予建议,即等到她收到遣散费后再来进行投诉,因为他们无法保证公司在调查期间是否会提供遣散费。当时劳拉已离开公司两个月。

劳拉声称,如果她不签署“公司免责”信函,人力部与TAFEP无法保证他的遣散费,而他的公司也表示若她不签,公司就不会支付遣散费。

她阐述,这就等同于“企业霸凌”(corporate bullying)。

与此同时,她认为人力部也在默许这种情况发生,她表示,“人力部对于裁员都了如指掌,因为公司裁员是需要向人力部报告,而且他们也批准了香港人才的EP,让她取代我的职位。”

“人力部有怀疑过这个外国人才正是取代本地劳动力的可能吗? 仅仅因为它是“公司内部调动”,所以他们就不再质疑了吗?”

本社随后也联系了劳拉的雇主与TAFEP取得回应,当时没有任何一方的答复。

曾公开劳拉真名随后又撤回

3月13日,人力部发表声明回应,其中他们公开劳拉的真实姓名与职称,然而当局随后却迅速撤回,并在翌日再以另一份声明取代,而新的声明下,并没有提及劳拉的真名。

人力部表示,经过他们听回通话记录后解释,劳拉曾提及希望雇主能够在3月7日发给她遣散费。该部指劳拉担忧当局的更进,可能影响公司发出遣散费的决定,故此劳拉同意TAFEP等到她取得遣散费后才介入。

同意等劳拉拿到遣散费后介入

当局也引用了劳拉当时在电话录音中的部分对话,“我在收到钱后就告诉你,3月7日我会再回来找你,你要做什么都好,我不管了。”

当局也接着说,劳拉在同天电话联系,再寄一封电子邮件给TAFEP,暗指后者不愿意协助她。

3月2日,人力部表示,劳拉已提醒TAFEP他的遣散费将在几天内会到期,她表示,“如果遣散费已经支付,我会在3月7日证实,请等待我确认再与路孚特(Refinitiv)联系。”

劳拉怪责TAFEP

人力部接着说,劳拉在3月6日通知TAFEP,她已收到了遣散费,但又指责TAFEP违背她的意愿,退缩没调查。

声明也表示,劳拉也威胁道,如果一周后仍得不到回音,她将与吴家和会面控诉。

人力部指出,当局也在同天给予回复,表示TAFEP已确认按照之前的协议进行调查,然而却得到劳拉的回复说,自己已经向吴家和爆料并同意公开纠纷。

人力部表示理解劳拉的痛苦

最后,人力部在声明中总结,能够理解劳拉在这段期间经历的痛苦,并表示已尽力支持并跟进案件,若发现其公司真的出现任何歧视性聘雇,违反了公平就业做法的三方准则,将会采取行动。

人力部也透露,他们也在1月30日和2月24日建议劳拉如果想要提出不当解雇索赔,应该在最后聘雇日期的一个月内,即指在3月19日。

去年公积金局曾公开诉求者真名

如上所述,人力部在发出最新声明前,曾发过初步声明,公开劳拉的真实姓名与职称,然而最新的声明没有这么做,仅以目前的假名陈述。此一举动也让人联想到去年12月时,公积金局董事会揭露一位身患免疫性疾病的单亲母亲的真实姓名,导致他无法工作。

当时该名母亲却在为支付公积金储蓄而奋力挣扎,而本社在报道时,也为了母亲的权益隐去了真实姓名,却被公积金局公开。

此举后来也被公众斥责,表示未考虑到妇女与家人的情况,许多网友直指公开妇女的资料是非常可耻的行为。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending