Germany’s foreign minister said Monday the rights to coronavirus vaccine research were not for sale, following reports Donald Trump wanted the US to buy exclusive access to a potential vaccine developed by a German biotech firm.

The comments, made in an interview to media group Funke, come as scientists raced to develop a vaccine against the deadly coronavirus that has killed some 6,000 people, seen millions placed under lockdown and devastated global markets.

“German researchers play a leading role in drug and vaccine development and we cannot allow others to seek exclusive results,” Heiko Maas told Funke.

Citing sources close to the German government, Die Welt newspaper had previously reported that Trump had offered “a billion dollars” to secure research into a vaccine by German biotech firm CureVac “only for the United States”.

“Germany is not for sale,” economy minister Peter Altmaier told broadcaster ARD on Sunday, reacting to the report.

At a news conference, interior minister Horst Seehofer was asked to confirm the attempts to court the German company.

“I can only say that I have heard several times today from government officials today that this is the case, and we will be discussing it in the crisis committee tomorrow,” he said.

CureVac said in a statement Sunday that it “abstains from commenting on speculations and rejects allegations about offers for acquisition of the company or its technology”.

Fury

The report prompted fury in Berlin.

“International cooperation is important now, not national self-interest,” said Erwin Rueddel, a conservative lawmaker on the German parliament’s health committee.

A US official told AFP Sunday that the report was “wildly overplayed”.

“The US government has spoken with many (more than 25) companies that claim they can help with a vaccine. Most of these companies already received seed funding from US investors.”

The official also denied that the US was seeking to keep any potential vaccine for itself.

“We will continue to talk to any company that claims to be able to help. And any solution found would be shared with the world.”

‘Take action’

CureVac, founded in 2000, is based in the German state of Thuringia, and has other sites in Frankfurt and Boston.

The firm markets itself as specialising in “development of treatments against cancer, antibody-based therapies, treatment of rare illnesses and prophylactic vaccines”.

The lab is currently working in tandem with the Paul-Ehrlich Institute, linked to the German health ministry.

Last week, the firm mysteriously announced that CEO Daniel Menichella had been replaced by Ingmar Hoerr, just weeks after Menichella met with Trump, his vice president Mike Pence and representatives of pharma companies in Washington.

“We are very confident that we will be able to develop a potent vaccine candidate within a few months,” CureVac quoted Menichella as saying on its website shortly after the visit.

On Sunday, CureVac investors said that they would not sell the vaccine to a single state.

“If we are successful in developing an effective vaccine, then it should help and protect people across the world,” said Dietmar Hopp, head of principal investor dievini Hopp Biotech Holding, in a statement.

Economy minister Altmaier welcomed the statement, saying it was a “fantastic decision”.

He also pointed out that the government has the power to scrutinise foreign takeovers, saying that “where important infrastructure and national and European interests are concerned, we will take action if we have to.”

– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

政府对非主流媒体处处提防,是天生的恐惧?

两周前,《雅虎新闻》记者Nicholas Yong上载了一篇文章,揭露非主流媒体在采访工作上和政府打交道时,往往会面对各种困难,例如无法第一时间获得重要官方通知、未获通知和邀请出席政府部门的记者会或重要活动。 他诉苦道,主流媒体新闻出街几小时后后,他们才收到官方文告;重要的官方活动亦会以“仅限本地媒体”为由,限制非主流媒体出席。 Nicholas 写道,“还有一次,我们向政府要求预先提供国庆日当天的演说稿–这可是一整年里面最重要的政治演说,但我们却被各个资深官员以“我手头上没有”而拒绝提供。相反地,主流媒体一天前就拿到讲稿了。” 主流与非主流媒体的差别待遇已不是新鲜事,Nicholas也曾提及,前两年的国会新闻采访上,非主流媒体被迫挤在狭窄的国会新闻发布室上,室内禁止携带手机,而且无法第一时间获得演讲稿。反观新加坡报业控股与新传媒记者,却可以获得国会实况。 “今时今日,为什么仍给予主流媒体抢占先机,难道是为了主导论述吗?”他质问。 同样地,本社对于这种厚此薄彼的偏驳,也感同身受。有准证的非主流媒体不会收到政府文告,而且有时这些完整文告也不会上载到政府部门官网,但主流媒体却可以率先报导出街。 举个例子:学术界联署反对《防假消息法》,但是教育部的回应声明,并没有第一时间上载到官方网站上,反而独家给了《海峡时报》。即便到今天,这则教育部声明也没办法在该部官网找到。 然而,有别于《雅虎新闻》获得媒体认证,本社则是注册在新闻与艺术部下的其中一家受监督媒体机构。 本社也曾在去年申请媒体认证,然而却被告知本社不需要取得认证即可报导本地新闻,而要不要发出认证,也取决于政府的斟酌: 如同Nicholas所提,政府真的对主流与非主流媒体有差别待遇,不论对已注册在新闻及艺术部下的媒体如《雅虎新闻》或本社,都有限制?…

S&P: Asia Pacific economies could suffer S$290.9 billion losses due to Covid-19

According to S&P Global Ratings (S&P) report on Friday (6 March), the…

Basic Military Training suspended by SAF from 7 April until 4 May 2020 in tandem with COVID-19 circuit breaker

The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) has announced that it will be suspending…

警可调用“合力追踪数据” 欧斯曼:关键在于部长有误导群众之嫌

本周一(4日),内政部政务部长陈国明证实,刑事程序法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括“合力追踪”便携器的数据,随后引发议论。 内政部兼律政部长尚穆根与外交部长维文均跳出来澄清,警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 人民党党员欧斯曼(Khan Osman Sulaiman),则在脸书上发文,指根本问题并不在于,警方是否能够从“合力追踪”获取资讯,而是教育部长黄循财等人曾向人民保证,所有收集的数据将仅用于防疫追踪,这似乎有误导公众之嫌。 的确,去年在跨部门工作小组的记者会上,黄循财与维文均强调,合力追踪应用程式将仅限于防疫追踪。 黄循财表示,“目前无意将合力追踪程式内的数据供调查所用。该程式旨在及时向我们提供信息,以便我们快速和有效追踪接触者而已。” 维文也同声呼应,指程式内的数据单纯用于追踪接触者。 对此,欧斯曼也将该情况与公积金作比喻,即政府也曾承诺在55岁时将可提取公积金,却在后来一直增至65岁。 他直指,“没完没了的改变目的。” 欧斯曼续指,政府应将警方可用合力追踪的数据一事,早些向公众透露。 “就目前而言,它们造就了一种感觉,即(政府)并未坦白整件事。”