Connect with us

Current Affairs

工人党“枕戈待旦” 人民党放话角逐四选区

Published

on

随着选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)出炉,根据以往从公布新选区划分报告、再到宣布大选的进程,坊间都在揣测选举蛩音已不远,有者甚至猜最早下个月,斋戒月前就会大选。

尽管当前我国仍面对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情笼罩,不过总理李显龙早前曾释放信息,似乎暗示当前有两种可能性,其一是期望疫情能在本届政府任期结束前稳定下来;其二,若在疫情当前召开选举,意味着将要在“风口浪尖”下,选出获得全新委任的新政府接手抗疫工作。

不过他表示:“如需要在疫情过去前召开选举,必须采取必要防疫措施,确保各政党能有效率地竞选、民众可安全投票。”

这意味着具备疫情当前举行选举的可能性。但若此时选举,各路在野党已表达不认同的立场,例如前进党秘书长陈清木医生就指出,在我国投票是强制性的,且到时会有大型选举活动,形同让260万选民蒙受感染的风险。

至于工人党则表态“政府理应慎重”,应顾虑国人的公共健康和利益。

何时选举,工人党“枕戈待旦”

不过,工人党也放话任何时候召开选举,该党都枕戈待旦,“我们为此准备了四年”。再者该党强调将采取必要防疫措施,确保竞选活动公平且安全。

来届选举除了要坚守阿裕尼集选区和后港,相信工人党或会强攻东海岸;至于上届选举工人党也有不错战绩的凤山、盛港西和榜鹅东单选区,却突兀地被取消,相信该党将只得转攻盛港集选区(纳入原有的盛港西)、榜鹅西和从义顺集选区重新划出的哥本峇鲁(Kebun Baru)。

至于民主党在去年就已表态有意竞逐于上届选举同样的选区,包括武吉巴督、裕华和武吉班让单选区,以及荷兰-武吉知马和马西岭-油池集选区。

前进党如何排兵布阵?陈清木“卖关子”

至于刚在去年成立的前进党,年初曾大阵仗拜访西海岸选区。根据选区范围委会划分,该区扩大为五人集选区后,也纳入丰加北单选区,和蔡厝港集选区的一部分。不过该党秘书长陈清木医生早前受访时曾表示,仍在规划部署该党将出战的选区,惟后者“卖关子”未透露更多。

有者猜测该党或许会派出猛将,强攻总理镇守的宏茂桥集选区,以及丹戎巴葛。

人民党:出战波东巴西等四选区

至于才在去年11月换心血、由谢镜丰和乔立盟接棒的人民党,则在两天前表态,将竞逐波东巴西、新增的单选区玛丽蒙(Marymount,从碧山-大巴窑划出,选民2万3439人)、蒙巴登单选区和碧山-大巴窑集选区。

波东巴西将由该党主席乔立盟出阵,该党前党魁詹时中已引领人民党近25年,更早在1984年,即成功赢得波东巴西议席,在该选区默默服务长达27载。

至于碧山大巴窑集选区由秘书长谢镜丰领军。该党指出,自上届选举以来就已在上述四个选区的社区耕耘。

人民之声积极走动惹兰勿刹、蔡厝港

由林鼎领导的人民之声党,也似乎正积极经营蔡厝港、丹绒巴葛、巴西立榜莪、惹兰勿刹等选区,林鼎本身也积极发表政论,逐步增加在选民间的印象。

而根据《联合早报》报导,革新党主席朱来成放话要挑战宏茂桥集选区、西海岸集选区和拉丁马士(Radin Mas)选区,以及刚从宏茂桥划分出来的杨厝港单选区。

至于国民团结党秘书长黄俊宏,则表示有意挑战淡滨尼集选区、三巴旺集选区、麦波申和先驱区。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending