Connect with us

Current Affairs

不堪长期遭骚扰,动粗夺命 退休男怪责曾报警59次

Published

on

一名退休男子和继子被指控,对他们口中的骚扰者造成严重伤害,两人在法庭上却轩然大怒怪责,之前曾多次报警要求警方干预,甚至报警多达59次,但却没有任何显著举动,以致一条生命就这样没有了。

首名被告58岁的林碧文(Lim Peck Beng Lawrence译音),被控在第二名被告(24岁继子郑士忠,Tay Seet Choong Ryan Xavier译音)的协助下,殴打26岁的肖恩·伊格纳修斯·罗德里格斯(Shawn Ignatius Rodrigues),直到后者当场死亡。

据悉,死者肖恩和第二被告郑士忠自2006年起,在义顺的海星圣母堂(Church of Our Lady Star of the Sea)担任祭坛男孩时就相识,但是在两人的友情恶化后,死者就不断骚扰第二被告和其家人。

死者是一名全职军人,他于2016年7月9日,在义顺22号街第279栋组屋电梯等候处附近,因头部受伤导致的创伤性窒息而身亡。

第二被告在和死者打斗后,第一被告林碧文参与打斗事件中,坐在死者的臀部上,并束缚死者的双脚。

死者涉嫌伤害妻子及邻居

第一被告于上周四(3月12日)首次出庭时指出,面对死者的骚扰,他曾尝试数种和平方式尝试保护家人,但是都失败收场。

在被律师提问时,第一被告表示,“自从我住在那儿,我们的住宅区和家庭都很和平”。“但是当肖恩在一天内多次骚扰我们后,我们的生活就不再平静。破坏住宅安宁,半夜敲打我们的门户,不是一次,而是很多次。”

他指出,死者曾多次骚扰他们,导致他们无法休息,导致住宅区不安,尤其是其家人。“他(死者)也和我的妻子有肢体接触,而我却无能为力。”

当说到这里时,第一被告的情绪开始激动,擦着眼睛并且声音断断续续。

法庭获悉,死者涉嫌骚扰第一被告的妻子,并涉嫌勒死第一被告的一名老邻居和殴打另一名邻居。

尝试理性沟通失败

第一被告指出,死者每次出现,都会询问第二被告的下落,就算第二被告不在家也是这样。“他的声音总是很单调地重复同样的问题,‘我想见Ryan(第二被告)’。我想见Ryan。”

他指出,当死者首次骚扰其家人时,他和家人曾试图无视死者的作为。“但是随着时间流逝,罗德里格斯逐渐从短讯骚扰,转到我们的公寓来,甚至在附近街区偷窥我们的公寓。”

“我记得有一次罗德里格斯来拜访Ryan时,我友好的问他,‘肖恩,为很么要这样做?’我认为理性沟通能够阻止他继续骚扰并远离我的家庭。但是我恐怕失败了。”

报警多达59次

最终,第一被告一家已经就死者骚扰一事,向警方做出多达59次投报。“我们以为警方可以协助我们,这就是我们不断报警的原因。”

而在律师询问报案后的结果时,第一被告表示什么都没有,“警方告知我们每当他(死者)出现,只要我们报案,警方就会出现。但是他从未被逮捕或查问过,而警察赶来时,他已经躲藏起来了”。

警察来到已躲起来

在询及一名老邻居被殴打的事件时,第一被告表示,他曾询问警方为何不对死者采取行动,但是警方却表示他们不在现场,没有看到打斗,无法将他逮捕。

他也表示,在参与调解会议时,双方都没有直接接触,所以也无济于事。

曾出席内长尚穆根会见人民活动求助

他在法庭上指出,他和未出庭的妻子当时先和调解员会面,之后才轮到死者和死者母亲。他忆述到,死者曾被告知不可以再去打扰第一被告和其家人,惟,死者只说了“现在”,而调解员却表示“不,要永远”。“很显然的,死者并没有听从调解员建议。”

他甚至指出,曾有一次,在他们参与调解会面后回家的路上,发现死者还特地等待他们。

第一被告也指出,他和妻子曾参与内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根与民会面活动,虽然没有见到这位义顺集选区议员,但是对方委派了一名律师和我们会面,将我们的陈述记录下来。“据我所知,他们也没有采取任何行动……他(死者)还是一直出现。”

坦言曾扔东西驱赶死者

他表示,他曾和妻子外出,在没有第二被告陪同下到义顺另一个地区享用家庭日参会时,被死者找到。他不知道死者是如何找到他们的,但是对方一直询问有关继子的下落。

他承认当时很生气,甚至朝死者的方向扔去一把椅子,希望把他赶走。

被告在继续盘问之前,曾询问第一被告是否情绪激动,而后者也承认面对死者带来的错则感到沮丧和恼火。

他坦言,曾经使用拿着杀虫剂朝死者脸上喷去,但是死者就站着根本不动。他也曾使用家中的小型灭火器、棒球棒来驱赶死者。

没想过要夺命

控方要求被告忆述2016年7月9日,当第二被告和死者打斗时所看到的一切,并重复询问当死者被第二被告袭击而俯卧在地上时,第二被告呈现的体态。

第一被告每次都会重申他的视力不佳,无法回忆所有细节,而且他的腿疼。“我只专注在压制住死者。为了帮助继子,我试图压制死者。就我而言,我并没有注意他在做什么。”

法庭于上周三在第二被告的证词中得知,第二被告涉嫌踩着死者的肩膀,多次殴打死者的脸部和头部,将死者的脸部用力压向地面,并用膝盖压在死者的背部约20分钟。

第一被告上周四在法庭上,曾宣读他交给警方的一份声明。“对我而言,似乎没有正义可言,如果有采取任何行动,这个意外不会发生。”

“当继子和我压制着死者时,我们无意要伸张正义或只是教训他一顿,不幸的,他离世了。”

“尽管我感到很难过……一条生命没有了,我和家人的生活却获得大大改善,我们不用担心再被骚扰。周围和平了。”

有关的聆审还在继续。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending