It appears that the first confirmed cased of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been traced back to a 55-year-old from Hubei province on 17 November 2019, according to data from the Chinese government that the South China Morning Post (SCMP) has seen. However, it was also noted that this patient might not be the first to contract the virus.

In a report today (13 March), SCMP noted that at least 266 people were identified so far as being infected last year, all of whom were placed under medical surveillance by Chinese authorities. Some of these cases might have been backdated after specimens taken from these suspected cases were later tested by health authorities, said SCMP.

The article explained that interviews with whistle-blowers from the medical community suggest that doctors in China only realised they were facing a new virus later in December.

Before the outbreak become an international health crisis, scientists had already started trying to map the pattern of transmission from early on when the epidemic was reported in the city of Wuhan in January.

A better understanding of how the virus is transmitted and how undetected and undocumented cases might contribute to the spread will help scientists get a better idea of how big a threat this really is.

From the day of the first case on 17 November, between one to five new cases were reported daily. After a month, the total number of infections were 27. But by 20 December, the total number of confirmed cases soared to 60.

Following this, a doctor from Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhan Jixian, informed local health authorities that the disease was in fact a new coronavirus. By then, over 180 people had been infected, though not all were identified by healthcare professionals at the time.

By the end of 2019, there were 266 cases. The next day, on 1 January 2020, the number of cases reached 381.

SCMP noted that while government records haven’t been made public, they do provide clues about the spread of the virus in the early stages and how many confirmed cases were recorded.

Who is patient zero?

Right now, scientists are looking into who might be the first patient, patient zero, so that they can trace the source of the virus. Scientists believe that the virus might have jumped from a wild animal, possibly a bat, to patient zero.

So far, none of the first nine patients reported to have the virus in November 2019 have been confirmed as being patient zero. The four men and five women were aged between 39 and 79. Unfortunately, it is unknown if they were residents of Wuhan, which has been identified as the epicentre of the outbreak.

SCMP noted that there might have been cases dating back even further.

According to the World Health Organistion (WHO), the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in China on 8 December. However, the organisation doesn’t track the spread of the disease on its own, relying instead on the information provided by each country.

On the other hand, an article in the medical journal The Lancet identifies the first known infection date as 1 December. This was a report by Chinese doctors from Jinyintan Hospital in Wuhan.

Alternatively, the first known whistle-blower in this crisis, Dr Ai Fen told People magazine that tests revealed a patient at Wuhan Central Hospital had contracted an unknown coronavirus on 16 December. This interview was later censored.

SCMP points out that reports from other doctors in Wuhan suggest that they were aware of the disease in late December.

Doctors asked to hold back on revealing information

Previous reports noted that while doctors in Wuhan collected samples from suspected cases in later December, they were unable to confirm their findings. This was because they were bogged down by bureaucracy including having to secure approval from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, which would take days.

They were also instructed not to reveal anything to the public about the new disease.

Even as late as 11 January, Wuhan’s health authorities still claimed that there were only 41 confirmed cases.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Coronavirus-stricken stock markets tanked following global oil price crash

On Monday (9 March), a vicious selloff was triggered due to world…

“李函轩是模范士兵” 国防部冀改善军训安全措施

昨日(27日),验尸庭针对服役军人李函轩(19岁)军训中暑身亡案件进行研讯,验尸官坦言当时的急救做得不够理想,送医过程延误。 独立医疗专家、医院急诊部主管邢伟坚医生曾供证表示,“竟然需要40分钟(将李函轩)送医,真的是太久了”。李函轩送院后,经12天抢救后回魂乏术,于2018年4月30日在樟宜综合医院过世。 去年9月,国防部宣称,完成对李函轩中暑案的审讯。六名武装部队军人,各面对怠忽职守、行为疏忽危及生命等罪行,遭军事法庭判罚款,各人罚款金额介于1千800元至4千500元。 针对验尸庭近期的研讯,新加坡国防部也在今日(28日)发表声明,强调李函轩一等中士(CFC),是恪尽职守的模范士兵。“他的离逝对家属和武装部队都是悲恸损失。我们对李函轩家属致以深沉哀悼。” 对于事故中的指挥官失职未能照顾士兵身心健康,国防部表示遗憾。国防部也重申,士兵的安全仍是核心价值且在培训中不能被妥协。在事故中违反军训和纪律规定的指挥官,已获得相应惩处。 当时的快步行军指挥官陈保树,在2018年10月31日,在刑事法典304A(a)下,因行为鲁莽导致他人死亡的罪名下被控。2020年1月8日,由于陈保树患末期癌症,在国家法院获无事省释。他在去年2月13日病逝。至于其余六名涉及事故军人,则遭军事法庭判罚款。 国防部声称,自李函轩事故以来, 武装部队在咨询委员会的建议下,已加强对热损伤的管理和预防措施。改善的安全机制包括简化的立即送医方案、在军训时让服役人员降体温的附加措施,同时教育指挥官和士兵,认识热损伤的症状等,并强调知情上报。 “武装部队将继续提升我们的安全体制,在培训士兵捍卫新加坡应对威胁的同时,达到军训零死亡事故。”  

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam "worried" for Hong Kong over ongoing protests, criticises international media for "muddied" narrative of events

The ongoing protests against Hong Kong’s extradition Bill are worrying, and that…

马国国会再通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》

马来西亚国会下议院再次通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。 根据《东方日报》报导,马国会下议院以记名投票的方式,最终以92票支持51票反对,三读通过《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2018年反假新闻法令》是在2018年4月2日,由国阵政府提呈并获得通过。希盟政府上任后提呈废除法案,虽然在去年8月16日下议院三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》是由首相署部长拿督刘伟强提呈。 反对党国会议员在辩论环节时,仍全力支持必须保留《2018年反假新闻法令》。 希望联盟执政后,兑现希盟宣言里的承诺,废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。而国会下议院在去年8月16日,三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 惟该法案再被带往上议院时,却在去年的9月12日,被上议院以28对21票驳回,以致《2018年反假新闻法令》废除不成。 至于马来西亚为何要废除《反假新闻法令》,要回到去年希盟政府开始执政后,声称现有法律已足够应对假消息传播的问题,例如1998年通讯与多媒体法等。 马国首相马哈迪表示,如果制定法律限制人们表达意见,恐怕亦可能遭政府滥用。 该法曾在去年提出废除,但遭马国上议院否决。