Connect with us

Current Affairs

“疫情发哨人”专访遭下架 中国网民挑战审查底线广传文章

Published

on

本周二(10日),中国国家主席习近平到湖北省武汉首次视察,引起当地轰动,但在同一天,一篇关于武汉医生的采访却引发了网友的关注。

据报道指出,3月10日早上,国家级权威出版机构人民出版社《人物》杂志原本在网上发布一篇文章《发哨子的人》,其接受采访的对象即是武汉中心医院急诊科主任艾芬,诉说她从疫情初到现在的经历与感受。

该篇文章指出,当天正是艾芬向同学转发一份病毒检测报告,才让整个武汉的医生圈得悉事件,包括被警方训诫的李文亮医生。 随后她被指是“造谣的源头”,受到了医院纪委的严厉批评,让她大受打击。

随后这篇文章在发布三小时后却便被删除,尽管中国一直以来以高强度的管制舆论而闻名,但此次删贴却发生始料未及的反作用,网民却如同接龙赛一般,利用各种方式,例如截图文章、表情图代号、甲骨文、拼音等,无所不用其极,只为了让文章继续在网络流传。

为何《发哨子的人》格外引起注意?

此次《发哨子的人》为何会格外引起注意,其中缘由为该篇报道首次公开,艾芬是“吹哨人”李文亮医生所发出的“SARS冠状病毒”检测报告照片的拍摄者。 此外,艾芬也透露有关部门在疫情初期时,刻意压制信息的细节。

文中提到,艾芬与李文亮、江学庆、梅仲明均为武汉市中心医院任职的医生,于12月医治一名高烧不退的病人,以及一名肺部感染近10天的病人。 12月30日,她接到一份不明肺炎病人的病毒检测报告,上面写着“SARS 冠状病毒”。她深知后面的影响,随即将其上报,并将报告发给医生同学。

之后该份报告在武汉医生之间流传,其中转发的人也包括李文亮医生。当时李文亮医生所公开的报告截图,即是艾芬所拍摄。

然而在她发出消息不久后,却收到市卫健委的通知,勿随意散播消息,翌日便被领导召见。 她表示,“遭受了前所未有的、非常严厉的斥责”,也被训斥为没有组织纪律造谣生事。

最终领导还告诫她不许讲关于肺炎的任何事情,哪怕是丈夫也不能透露。

“我做错了什么? 我做了一个医生,一个人正常应该做的事情,”采访中艾芬称。

“早知道有今天,我管他批评不批评,老子到处说,是不是?”

文章也指出,尽管情况危险,但上级却坚称没有人传人的迹象,因此他只能眼睁睁看着病人越来越多,甚至扩大。

据了解,武汉市中心医院已有4名医生因感染新冠肺炎过世,院内有超过200医护感染,目前还有多个科室主任在用叶克膜维持生命。

艾芬指事件后心情激动,自己受到很大打击,她又在访问中数次指自己后悔,“早知道有今天,我管他批评不批评,“老子”到处说,是不是? ”

她认为,其中缘由就是因为没有给医务人员信息透明化有关。她一直希望院方给她道歉,但不敢问,也没有人在任何场合向她表达过道歉。

对此,她认为此次事件更加证明了每个人都必须要坚持自己的独立思想,必须要有人站出来说真话,这个世界必须要有不同的声音。

尽管文章已被删除,但这篇文章却以不同形式在中国网络疯传,有些自媒体试图转载原文继续传播,但却被删除,网友则开始动员各种创意方法,先后出现先后出现了倒排、侧排、繁体字、英文等多种形式,甚至通过甲骨文、颜文字、摩斯密码、火星文、盲文等不同方式,不断挑战审查底线。

《BBC中文网报道》报道,原本这篇文章应在该杂志的3月号出刊,因此许多民众也试图通过网上订购的方式获取本期实体书,但商家表示,出版社已经通知供应商,可能会修改封面或其他内容,原本定好的封面与内容也均需待定。

熟悉中国事务的资深传媒人、香港浸会大学新闻系高级讲师吕秉权对《新唐人电视台》表示,这篇《人物》杂志文章触碰到中共总书记习近平的敏感神经,原因是习近平正要在同一时间“收割”对抗疫情的“功劳”。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending