Connect with us

Current Affairs

网友社媒揭妹妹遭同学霸凌 王乙康促校方采取适当行动

Published

on

一名姐姐在社媒上揭发妹妹遭到学校霸凌,在生日当天收到同学们丢来语带讽刺的纸条,并表示这并非其妹妹首次受到霸凌,引起教育部长的关注,要求校方采取行动。

署名batakab的网友于本月6日,在推特帖文指出其妹妹在生日当天,收到来自同学们写着讥讽话语的字条,更声称那是给妹妹的生日礼物。

她在贴文中展示了纸条,只见纸上话语指网友妹妹笨和迟钝,“就像呆宝小飞象一样”,另一张则进行人身攻击,指她丑。

她指出,这并非妹妹首次遭到欺负,之前也曾在她的校服上发现到马克笔乱画的痕迹,并指妹妹也受到了网络霸凌。

针对此事,教育部长王乙康昨晚(10日)就在脸书上帖文,指出有关霸凌事件发生在弥陀学校,参与者是一群小学五年级的学生,遭霸凌者为一名巫裔学生。

I was dismayed and troubled when I read about the bullying case at Mee Toh School.

A group of students had picked on…

Posted by Ong Ye Kung on Tuesday, March 10, 2020

王乙康指出,在得知此事后倍感失望和担忧,强调霸凌行为是错误的,且在任何地方都不能被接受,尤其是在校园内。“这行为违背了我们所在社会的一些非常基本的价值观。学生是否只是恶作剧,或只限于五年级生,这都不重要;重要的是,受害者已经认为这是种族主义行为,更令人难以接受。”

他促请校方介入,确保学生了解到他们恶劣行为所带来的的严重性,并给予适当的纪律处分。

网民谴责霸凌

部长的贴文发出后,立刻引起网民热烈回应和分享,部分家长更分享了他们孩子遭到同学霸凌的经历。

大部分网民都赞同要求校方采取行动,然而他们认为家长的教育更为重要。“我曾看到5岁的孩子在托儿所内,当着印裔教师的面称呼‘阿本’(abnn),我相信他们不是在托儿所学到的。”

“部长,难道你不觉得家长、教师和校长必须一起在面对一些情况时,有一些共识吗?孩子都是学习大人的行为。”

也有部分网友认为,校方和教育部其实也有责任来帮助减少类似问题。“我觉得校方能够在周会或道德教育课程,或通过组织学校活动来灌输学生的价值观,提高他们的意识。”

网友指校方无视孩子遭霸凌

同时,在贴文下也不难看到有网友分享了孩子在学校遭到霸凌的事件,有者甚至指出,就算向校方反映了,情况也没有好转。

署名Lisa Forza的网友指出,她的孩子在学校遭到语言霸凌后进行报复,却遭校方更严厉对付,并指语言攻击并没有造成任何身体伤害,所以网友的儿子需要道歉并接到校方的警告信函。

她指出,有时不太愿意向教育部投报,因为感觉教育部会偏帮校方。而她就读二年级的二儿子在学校,遭其他孩子欺负地伤痕累累,老师根本不在乎也不想管理层反映。

评论中,她也一一反映了其他问题,包括想要转校,但是因为经济不允许而作罢。

她的评论随后也获得很多网民做出回应,且大部分都面对同样问题,并希望教育部能够采取行动。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending