Current Affairs
人人都一脸迷茫、乏味? 泰旅客叹新加坡人笑容消失了
一位常常踏足我国的泰国旅客,在问答网站Quora上载了一篇文章,谈到他的发现,感叹:新加坡人不笑了。
泰籍游客吴莱喇(Arkaneh Urairat)在文章中写到,“我想每个人都知道新加坡人缺乏了什么-新加坡人的微笑”。“身为一名泰国人,当我离开樟宜机场到酒店的那一刻,感觉浑然不同了。”
他从在酒店外遇见的人身上察觉到,只有数人展示出欢迎的姿态,更不用说展露笑容了。
而在一间小贩中心内,他也发觉很多“一脸乏味”的新加坡人。“我坐在一个座位上,对面是一脸乏味的女士。用完餐后,我发现她似乎很迷茫。虽然很想和她聊天,但是怕她会误会了。”
“我看过去另一桌,看到另一名同样一脸乏味的女士,似乎刚刚用晚餐却呆坐着。”
到底是什么拿走了微笑
他在离开小贩中心后,心中浮现了一个问题,“是什么能够让新加坡人笑起来”。
他表示,虽然说新加坡的生活可能很艰难,但是他的同乡在泰国的生活似乎更煎熬。
他指出,情况在遇见新加坡朋友时才会产生变化,“我的朋友们都很热情,脸上总是带着微笑”。“泰国人很容易微笑,因为他们已准备好和陌生人交流,或是在陌生人询问方向时和他们互动,陌生人也会因你脸上带着微笑,而走向你、向你问路或其他事情。”
多名国人仍面对求职困难
透过文章,我们能猜测或许作者拥有足够的时间和金钱旅游,但是报道指出,越来越多国人正在国内努力地觅职。
在新加坡专业人士、经历、行政人员或专才(简称:PMET)采访中,最近受访者为49岁的杰夫(Jeff,假名)。他于去年10月自一家跨国制造公司退休后,就陷入失业的困境。这期间,他已向多家公司发出超过500封履历表,以申请新工作,然而截止受访时,他只收到一个回复。
这名上有父母,下有妻子和两名孩子要照顾的男子,在开始申请工作时,已将他的薪金要求从原本在的跨国公司5900元月薪,降低到2000元,只因为他急需要一份工作。在等待第二次面试的杰夫表示,“我很需要一份工作,来保障我的生活”。
另一名PMET受访者则是52岁的阿伦(Alan Lim),他在为星和(StarHub)服务了20年后,于两年前遭裁员,而在星和的最后一份工作是一名月薪一万元的高级客户经理。
失业后的阿伦曾参与数次面试,但是都被公司拒绝,有人说是因为他的年纪太大了,有者则指是他的薪金要求太高,然而他只要求4000元,是他在星和月星的四成而已。遭到多次拒绝的阿伦,最终决定成为Grab私召车司机。
另一名和阿伦有着类似命运的罗先生(54岁),曾经是一家跨国物流公司的重型起重机专家,直到去年7月面临被裁员的命运,这是他在三年内二度被裁员了。最后,他选择成为Grab私召车司机,而当他在2016年初,首次从一家外国物流公司的区域经理被革职后,曾加入优步(Uber)私召车队伍。
政府受促正视国民实况
官委议员特斯拉博士(Walter Theseira)于上周四(3月5日)在国会上,曾敦促政府在供应辩论中商议有关粮食安全问题。他指出,虽然我国是一个富裕的国家,但是仍然有许多人为了取得足够的健康食品而努力。
特斯拉指出,虽然我国被《经济学人信息社》(Economist Intelligence Unit)评论为全球第四大安全食品国,但是国内236个家庭内,有将近一半住户处于中度至严重食物不安全状况。“这些可在由新加坡管理大学(SMU)连氏社会创新中心的饥饿和食物爱好者天堂2018年报告中,所获得的数据。”
他指出,除了种族自助团体和社区组织展开食物援助之外,我国还有约125个食物支援组织在运作。
在财政预算案拨款辩论中,特斯拉提出了一个尖锐的问题,即“基本上,多少的食物才算足够。问题是,足够是什么?”。
据特斯拉指出,由李光耀公共政策学院助理教授黄国和领导的2019年最低收入标准研究显示,一个单身年长者估计需要花费400元在食品上,占了他们预算中的29巴仙。
“更重要的是,这项研究指出,对于卡路里,新加坡人更看重身体吃下的食物,那是心灵的粮食,包括做出有意义的选择和种类、有机会享用健康饮食,偶尔也会放纵自己,有机会到小贩中心和朋友见面,或邀请他人享用家中美食。”
“一天不只是三顿饭,而是三顿具有尊严的餐点。”
Current Affairs
TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods
The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.
The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.
The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.
These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).
In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.
According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.
MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.
However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.
In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”
It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.
As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.
TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.
In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.
TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.
This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.
The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.
In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.
MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.
Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.
POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.
Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.
As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.
Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.
Current Affairs
Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.
SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.
This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.
Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.
He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.
These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.
Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.
The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.
CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.
Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.
He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments1 week ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Comments1 week ago
Netizens push back on Ho Ching’s 8-10 million population vision and call for more foreigners
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Full-time NSF found unconscious in camp dies; MINDEF says death not training related