According to a statement released by the Ministry of Health (MOH) on Sunday (8 March), a 26 year-old Singaporean male who has no recent travel history to affected countries and regions around the world, has been infected with COVID-19.

He is the country’s 138th case.

The man is a close contact with Case 66 and family member of Case 83 and 91. All these three cases are linked to the cluster of The Life Church and Missions Singapore.

Due to his close contact with the three previous cases, he had been quarantined from 15 February to 6 March.

However, in the afternoon of his last day of quarantine (6 March), the man’s test results confirmed positive for COVID-19 infection.

After his quarantine of almost three weeks ended, the man who lives at Rivervale Drive, had visited SAFRA Punggol (9 Sentul Crescent).

He is currently being placed in isolation at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases.

The MOH stated that when it comes to contact tracing, the Ministry will closely monitor all close contacts. As a precautionary measure, they will be quarantined for 14 days from their last exposure to the patient.

In addition, all other identified contact who have a low risk of being infected will be under active surveillance and will be contacted daily to monitor their health status.

As of Sunday afternoon, MOH has confirmed and verified 12 more new cases of COVID-19 infection, bringing the number of cases in Singapore to 150.

Upon reading about the Singaporean man who visited SAFRA Punggol after his quarantine ended, many netizens slammed him for being irresponsible by leaving his house right after the quarantine period is over. Stating that he should be “fined and punished” for his act, they added in the Facebook page of Mothership that it’s logical for him to stay at home even though the quarantine period is over, given that the results of the test were still unknown.

A large number of online users questioned the effectiveness of 2 or 3 weeks of quarantine period. This is because the man was still tested positive for the coronavirus even after 3 weeks. As such, they urge the Government to increase the quarantine period and ensure that the test results should be out before the quarantine period is over.

Alvin SP Koe explained that there’s a high chance that Case 138 did not exhibit any signs and symptoms at the end of his quarantine period. As such, he suggested that the “Govt might need to extend the quarantine period to 30 days because the signs and symptoms might only show up later”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SIA bid for loss making Air India 19 years ago but pulled out due to hostile response in India

It was earlier reported that SIA is currently in talks with its…

TWC2 goes public with story about migrant workers being locked inside room after MWC failed to show any signs of action

In a Facebook post published on Tuesday (21 April), migrant labour’s rights…

《防假消息法》也管私人聊天群组? 网民感隐私被侵犯“很不舒服”

律政部高级政务部长辉于周二(5月7日)在国会中说明《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》细节时指出,散播假信息的交流平台,如私人聊天群组或社交媒体群组,以及端对端(end-to-end encryption )加密,只允许发送者和接收者交流的网站将被屏蔽。这项举措让很多网民感到不舒服,抨击如同隐私被侵犯。 在《防假消息法》辩论中,唐振辉曾表示,聊天群组和社交媒体群组般的封闭式渠道,与开放式渠道一样,是“公共扩音器”。“由于假消息可以被隐藏起来,这些渠道则是故意散布假新闻的理想平台。研究人员认为,在封闭式的空间里,人们更容易受到假新闻感染情绪,因为群体内人士是熟悉和相互信任的。” “因此,草案意识到封闭式平台不一定是私人的。他们不仅可用于个人和私讯,但是也能在同一个时间和数百或数千人交流。” 根据该法案,部长一旦指出某些新闻内容不属实,将有权发布更正令或停止向外沟通,基本上是强迫散布假消息的个人或公司、网站作出更正或撤出有关消息。 他指出,更正令将以通告形式发出,警告人们有关的假消息,有关通告也将列出事实或与提供事实的网页衔接。 他也指出,除了在新闻媒体和互联网中介等平台上公布或放大有关的更正通告,更正通告也可能成为假新闻的警告标签。“有关指示可以针对任何在网上发出假新闻的平台,无论是什么平台,无论是开放式或封闭式的,包括端到端加密的平台。” 根据《防假消息法》,唐振辉说道,有关的指示具备弹性,能够处理散播在未来开发平台上的假新闻。 如独裁统治言论 在有关的信息公布后,许多网民纷纷表示政府采用的《防假消息法》程序,已经侵犯了他们的隐私,感到非常不满。 他们在《海峡时报》脸书专页上纷纷留言,表示对此举感到不安,并且听起来“很像独裁统治”。Mohd Iskandar…

Kudos to athletes & volunteers, but management can do better

Not the first time that ticket confusion has led to unhappiness at…