Current Affairs
【武汉冠状病毒】3月9日增10起病例 裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴跃升最大感染群
根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月9日中午12时,本地新增10起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中六起与裕廊SAFRA歌唱班团拜晚宴有关联,有三起为入境病例。
这意味着上月15日在裕廊SAFRA美满楼举办的歌唱班团拜晚宴感染群,已累计36起病患,成为迄今为止最大的感染群。
今日新增的第155、156、157、158、159和第160例,都与上述感染群有关,其中还有五岁男童。
第151例是51岁男公民,与基督生命堂感染群有关,曾接触第66例和91例。他是在上月4日就出现症状,并分别在5日和15日到诊所求诊,8日和13日到义顺综合诊所。
经卫生部确认,他与1月25日的美苑通道(Mei Hwan Drive)新年聚会有关联,一度在上月22日被转介到国家传染病中心。尽管之前已康复,在昨日中午的血清测试结果,仍证实他确诊。不过该名男子已在今日出院。他住在义顺环路一带。
第152至154例相信是入境病例。第152例是65岁印尼籍人士,早在上月28日就已出现症状,本月2日到雅加达的医院求诊。本月7日他抵达新加坡,随即被转介到中央医院并在隔日确诊。
第153例相信也是入境病例,她是65岁的新加坡女公民,曾在上月25日至28日期间到过印尼。她反映期间她曾拜访过患肺炎的姐妹。本月3日她出现症状,该日和7日到蔡厝港综合诊所求医;7日前往中央医院急诊部并在隔日确诊。入院前她住在德惠路一带。
第154例是52岁英籍男士,本月6日抵达新加坡,并在今日早上确诊。
第155例则与裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴感染群有关,曾与第128例接触。是47岁马来西亚籍女性,是工作准证持有者。她此前未到过境外感染重灾区。
第156例是50岁女性永久居民,同样与裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴感染群有关。
第160例五岁男童
第157例是女性永久居民,曾与第137例接触;第158例是53岁女公民、第159例(59岁男公民)和第160例,同样都未到过境外感染重灾区。
第160例是五岁男童,是第145例的家属,在今早确诊。
第145例是67岁女公民,曾接触134例,是在本月8日确诊;入院前住在位于德惠巷的住处,也曾到过该区商店。
至于昨日公布的第148例,67岁新加坡女公民,曾在上月11日至14日到过印尼,曾接触第107例,在入院前曾到过滨海湾金沙赌场,以及住在林太师路一带。
至于第149例在上月23日就出现症状,本月7日到诊所求医,并在8日确诊。入院前曾出席多个民众俱乐部和居委会的歌唱班,也曾拜访过通准庙乐龄俱乐部。他住在裕廊西32街一带。
同样第150例(53岁女性永久居民),也曾在入院前到南洋民众俱乐部出席歌唱班和其他活动,她住在裕廊西64街。
经确认她曾接触第115和134例,在上月29日出现症状,7日转介到国家传染病,昨日早上确诊。
今日三名病患出院
与此同时,今日再有三名病患出院,包括第112例、138例和今日确诊的151例。
第138例是是26岁男公民,除了与第66例有近接触、也是第83例的家属,与新加坡基督生命堂(The Life Church and Missions)感染群有关联。曾于确诊前到榜鹅战备军协俱乐部。
迄今已有93人出院,目前仍有67人待在医院,大多情况稳定或有起色。不过,多达10名病患待在加护病房。
Current Affairs
Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.
SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.
This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.
Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.
He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.
These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.
Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.
The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.
CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.
Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.
He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.
Current Affairs
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.
On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.
Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.
According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.
Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.
He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.
In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:
- Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
- Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
- Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
- How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
- How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?
The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.
Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.
He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.
Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”
He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.
The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.
At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.
Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.
As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.
-
Comments1 week ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments5 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore1 week ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore6 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore7 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Major breakdown on East-West Line: SMRT faces third service disruption in a month