Connect with us

Current Affairs

WP raises concern over preparation works in electrifying public transport & voice the need for ASEAN’s cooperation

Published

on

In the Workers’ Party’s (WP) budget speech on climate change delivered by Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party (WP) Non-Constituency Member of Parliament on 27 February, the issue of recalibrating the country’s transport sector was raised.

Specifically, Mr Tan noted that WP welcomes the government’s plan to phase out all internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles by 2040, as announced by Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat in his budget presentation last month.

Government measures to encourage the transition to electric vehicles

Mr Heng had said that the government will be introducing new measures to encourage the switch to electric vehicles (EV), starting with a new rebate scheme called ‘EV Early Adoption Incentive’. Under this scheme, those who purchase fully electric cars and taxis will receive a rebate of up to 45% on their Additional Registration Fee.

Next, Mr Heng said that the government will also be working with the private sector to expand the public charging infrastructure for EVs at public car parks, with a goal of deploying up to 28,000 chargers islandwide by 2030. This would be a substantial improvement from the 1,600 chargers present as of today.

Mr Heng also announced that a revision will be made on the existing vehicular tax structure – kicking in on January 2021 – as the transition from ICE to EVs would have a “major impact on tax revenues”. Explaining this, Mr Heng said that fuel excise duties today yield S$1 billion a year, a significant contribution to government revenues.

Mr Heng went on to highlight that EVs do not pay fuel excise duty; hence, the government is looking to implement a “usage-based tax” on EVs as an alternative. However, he noted that the technology to do that is still several years away.

In the meantime, the government will be imposing a lump-sum tax that will be built into the road tax structure for EVs to relatively make amends for the loss in fuel excise duties.

What about reducing the carbon footprint of power generation?

In his speech on WP’s climate change agenda, Mr Tan explained that while his party welcomes these initiatives, there are still issues that need to be addressed.

“The biggest elephant in the room is on rebuilding an infrastructure currently tailored for ICE engines,” said Mr Tan, adding that the power grid, in particular, will be taxed due to this transition to EVs.

While the country is in a power glut at the moment, electricity demands will increase as Singapore moves on it’s Smart Nation goals.

Pointing to the example of Sweden, Mr Tan explained that their ban on ICE vehicles states for 2030 had caused the demand for electricity to outgrow the capacity of local power grids, thus forcing EV charging networks to compete with each other in infrastructure projects for electricity.

On top of that is the concern that Singapore currently generates upwards of 95% of its energy in natural gas.

“While it is the least-polluting fossil fuel and has higher efficiency compared to ICE vehicles, there will continue to be a carbon footprint generated,” said Mr Tan.

He then asked, “While our current power generation mix will improve by 2030 due to more solar capacity, how are we moving to lowering the carbon footprint of our power generation in 2030 – 2040?”

Next, WP highlighted that the government’s goal of setting up 28,000 charging points by 2030 – with an assumption of 30% conversion to EVs – still means that there’s only 1 charging point to 10 EVs.

Mr Tan asked, “Should we even be contented with this ratio?”

He added, “Besides intelligent charging solutions, should the government also consider the alternative of battery swap stations which have the advantage of speed, ensuring load on our power grid can be managed well, as well as providing a ready infrastructure for battery recycling?”

What about the electrification of public transport?

Moving on, WP also raised the question on how soon the country’s public bus and private hire infrastructure would make the transition to EVs given that many Singaporeans rely on such services.

Mr Tan asked, “Would the Ministry of Transport give a timeline on this happening separately from the 2040 overall target?”

On that note, Mr Tan highlighted the need for ASEAN cooperation if Singapore wants to successfully electrify its transport system, with a key consideration being Malaysia.

As many people and trade now travel via the Causeway and the Tuas Second Link on ICE vehicles, WP wondered if the phasing out of ICE vehicles in Singapore would include implementing a ban on foreign ICE vehicles entering the country.

“If there is no infrastructure in place in Malaysia to support commercial EVs, would that also impact our businesses with a top partner in trade?”

Mr Tan stressed, “This is important to get right as, on one hand, foreign ICE vehicles and how we handle the issue, may have a significant impact on our EV plans, and on the other hand, we should not be seen to export our green problems away with unilateral bans.”

He goes on to say that the government can work with Malaysia’s state and federal authorities to build a sustainable and inclusive ecosystem for EVs.

Going a step further, Mr Tan also says that the government should propose an ASEAN Autonomous Vehicle and Electric Vehicle project that “holistically looks at all the challenges of EVs” which has already been raised by WP MP Leon Perera previously.

“The effective solving of these issues I have highlighted in the adoption of EVs can turn us into the bellwether state in ASEAN for EV adoption, just as Norway is for both the Nordic region and the world,” said Mr Tan.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending