A key functional role of the opposition in Parliament is to scrutinise the government’s budget, said Worker’s Party (WP) MP Pritam Singh, adding that this includes making enquiries as well as raising clarifications and objections.

In a Facebook post this morning (6 March), Mr Singh addressed the Budget and Committee of Supply debate process. He noted that his party has proposed suggestions over the last two weeks covering everything from bread-and-butter issues like CPF usage, job concerns of elderly Singaporeans, and better healthcare for seniors to other matters such as accountability of the country’s reserves and climate change.

He also highlighted issues specific to this year’s debates such as the concerns of private hire bus drivers and additional support for them in the midst of the Covid-19 outbreak.

Mr Singh wrote about the role his party plays in scrutinising the budget, “That process is a central ingredient of our parliamentary democracy, regardless who is in Government and which party is in opposition.”

He went on to share a moment during a break in the debates shared by WP MPs and Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat.

“As we transited from the Budget debate to the Committee of Supply debates late last week, Finance Minister Heng came over to join the WP MPs during the break,” he said.

“The upside and downside of different political systems, the ongoing Democratic Presidential primaries and China’s initial response to the COVID-19 especially towards whistleblowers came up, and all of us spoke freely.”

Mr Singh added, “While we keep an eye on the changing world around us, the Singapore that we call home – and are proud to call home – is at the centre of the work my WP colleagues and I undertake, both in and out of Parliament.”

He concluded the post by noting his eagerness, and that of the other WP MPs, to “getting back on the ground”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S'pore pump price dropped by up to 5 cents; only M'sia diesel price dropped 3 cents

Pump prices in Singapore have dropped for as low as S$0.05 per…

卫生部集团总监:不因无力支付被拒 国民均能获妥善医疗照护

“我才意识到,原来病患从私人医生被转介到政府医院看专科医生可能无法享有补贴,只有综合诊所转介的病人才有资格享用。” 网民Tan Keong Boon周二(10日)发表文章《医疗费用:帮助那些无法享用补贴的人们》到海峡时报论坛中,质问为何立国一代不能享有补贴,如果是从私人诊所转介到政府医院。 文章表示,大多数受雇人士都可以到与公司合作的家庭科医生,其中是因为可以享用与雇主共同支付,即使在退休后,他们在没有雇主的共同支付下,仍然需要和同一位医生继续跟进病情。 对此,作者表示是否可将补贴扩大至私人医生转介的病患。 建国立国一代转介专科均有补贴 卫生部集团总监Chan Beng Seng,今日于《海峡时报》论坛上否认此说法,表示当建国一代与立国一代被转介到专科时,均有资格获得补贴。不仅仅是综合诊所转介的,获得社保援助计划(CHAS)的私人医生也可以获得补贴。 换句话说,只有社保援助计划(CHAS)批准的私人家庭科医生在转介给政府医院时,才能获得补贴,那也算是半政府经营的诊所之一。 卫生部表示,“在专科,病人可以享有高达75巴仙的门诊服务补贴,而建国一代与立国一代则可享用额外的服务与药物补贴费用。而早前由私人家庭科医生的病患,无论是建国一代还是立国一代,都可告知专科,再由工作人员申请将他们转入补贴服务中。”…

PAP Alex Yeo gives free legal services to Paya Lebar residents and launches new health programme for them

Alex Yeo, the grassroots adviser and People’s Action Party (PAP) branch chairman…

“探讨如何衡量公民社会成熟度” 尚穆根疑曲解韩俐颖原意

日前,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,声称新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预。他更点名历史学者覃炳鑫和自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人,去年8月30日前往马来西亚吉隆坡拜会马国首相敦马,吁请后者带头把民主带到新加坡等东南亚国家。 此外,尚穆根不忘挑起,覃炳鑫与韩俐颖也曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题。 他更指出,韩俐颖曾在一段视频中指出,新加坡不如香港,没有50万人上街游行,她希望透过《新叙事》(New Naratif)主办课程,改变这点。 对于尚穆根的指控,韩俐颖也在个人博客指出,尚穆根所说的视频,应是指自己在2016年,于新民巷主办“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛上发表的言论。然而, 后来竟被谣传是,她希望新加坡可以像2019年的香港一样。(莫非韩俐颖有预知能力,当时就知道三年后香港的局面?) 她说,自己在2016年的言论,被一些亲行动党的网络“喷子”(troll)粉丝网页拿来断章取义和恶搞,难道部长的实际消息来源,是来自这些喷子网页? 韩俐颖还原当时说了什么 她解释,自己实际上在致词中说,如果要以香港50万上街的人数,来衡量所谓公民社会运动成功的标准,新加坡不如香港。但是,“50万人上街”(就是走上街头的人数)绝不是有效的KPI标准,来衡量一个国家公民社会的力量和成熟度,社群网络间的团结也很重要。 如果有行之有效的民主程序,那最好,就不需要有50万人上街诉求;但是一个能运作的民主,仍需要一个成熟和有韧性的公民社会。 这意味着,她从头到尾,都没讲过要靠《新叙事》课程主办的课程,来改变新加坡不如香港没50万人上街游行这点;更何况,《新叙事》迟至2017年9月才成立,在她发表相关言论时《新叙事》根本不存在。 她在博文中感叹,当自己参与本地公民社会活动的同时,也没少成为霸凌或恶搞的对象;而有关“外国势力干预”的说法,也由那些亲行动党脸书专页等宣传放大,故此如政府将来推出新法来应对“外国势力”,也不感到意外。…