On Thursday (5 March), Associate Professor Walter Theseira, a Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), urged the government to address the problem of food security in a Supply Debate Speech.

Assoc. Prof Theseira argued in his speech that though Singapore is a rich country, there are still many who struggle to afford sufficient healthy food.

The Assoc. Prof remarked, “Singapore was ranked by the Economist Intelligence Unit as the fourth most secure Food Nation in the world, yet nearly half of a sample of 236 families in Singapore have reported moderate to severe food insecurities. These were the findings of a 2018 report by the Hunger and Food Lover’s Paradise by the Lien Centre of Social Innovation Centre at Singapore Management University (SMU)”.

He added that there were some 125 food support groups operating in Singapore, in addition to food support from ethnic self-help groups and community organisations.

During the Budget Supply Speech, Assoc. Prof Theseira posed a pointed question. He asked, “A basic question is how much food is enough. But the question is, enough for what?”

According to the Assoc. Prof, the 2019 Minimum Income Standards study led by Dr Ng Kok Hoe of the Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, a single elderly household requires an estimate of S$400 for food, which is about 29 per cent of their budget.

He explained, “More importantly, that study reveals that Singaporeans consider food to be more than calories for the body; it is nourishment for the soul. It includes having meaningful choice and variety, the opportunity to eat healthily but also enjoy the occasional indulgence, and the chance to meet friends at the hawker centre or invite others to a home-cooked meal.”

He added, “It is not three restaurant meals a day. It is three meals with dignity.”

To illustrate his point, the Assoc. Prof Theseira quotes a study by Diana Ong from the Chinese Assistance Development Council and Dr Ong Qiyan from the Social Service Research Centre, National University of Singapore (NUS). The study revealed that lower income families who opt for healthier meals spend S$204 per month, per person.

This sum is much more than what a less healthy diet costs, which is S$168. The big difference in spending is not in eating out, but is in trying to eat a healthier home cooked diet, said the associate professor.

“These results are consistent with the food insecurity–obesity paradox that in a rich country, food insecurity manifests not as starvation, but as an inadequate and unhealthy diet that exposes the poor to risks of obesity and malnutrition,” he said.

Assoc. Prof Theseira also highlighted that though food insecurity here may not indicate starvation, it does contribute to the problem of people making difficult choices to choose between the nutrition of a family and having enough money for other necessities.

Because of this, many food charities have stepped up to bridge the gap that these families desperately require.

“Despite good intentions, charities are struggling to meet this varied needs,” the NMP explained.

Assoc. Prof Theseira then cautioned that though Budget 2020 aims to distribute S$100 per year in grocery vouchers to help needy households over the next two years, there is a need for a full Government food security programme.

In addition to that, the Assoc. Prof also broached the issue on his Facebook post yesterday. In his post, he explained that food security programmes should be designed to incorporate the need to improve health for families and children, not just for today but for years to come.

To him, there is ample evidence suggesting that nutrition in childhood and economic growth goes hand-in-hand. Therefore, he emphasised that there is a need to address and solve this problem.

“Food security programmes can improve health for families and children not just today, but many years later. There is increasing evidence of the link between nutrition in childhood, and economic and health outcomes years down the road. Let’s commit to officially measuring food insecurity and addressing it as a Government priority.” he wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lim Guan Eng wants to get Malaysian talents working in S’pore to return home

Malaysia’s Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng wants to make the country attractive…

公民质问:部长是否获全面医疗保险额外待遇?

Simon Lim撰文,林殊译 前几日我在公立医院接受治疗。住院期间,我曾目睹护士们如何24小时无休地工作,也让我重新省思有关医疗人员国籍问题、医疗费用、医疗保险与其他医疗津贴。 有关医疗费用和医疗保险,其中一个想法涌上心头。我确信大家仍记得交通部长许文远过去宣称自己做心脏绕道手术,只需缴付8元的故事。 我也相信大家对他这番言论感到非常不舒服,然而,我是其中一个相信他所说的,也是相信这代表着他或许拥有非常充足的医疗账户(Medisave),抑或是非常全面的医疗保险。 如果许文远是透过自己购买的医疗保险来支付的话,我会恭喜他,也会为他送上祝福。 不过,我有个疑问。 我不知道如果人民行动党的部长们,是否拥有全面医疗保险作为他们的额外待遇?两周前,我向民情联系组(REACH)提出我的问题,也得到他们回复,已将问题向相关单位寄出,但截至今日,我仍未收到任何回复。 如果人民行动党的部长们真得有享有全面的医疗保险保障,那就必须停止!我必须强烈谴责。为什么?容我解释。为符合裸薪(clean wage)需求,就连开车到学校上班的老师,都要缴停车费用。我们的部长领着让其他经合组织(OECD)国家都羡慕的高薪,而这些薪水是由我们人民支付给他的。 新加坡人理应有基本的认知、骨气和纪律,不应允许任何政党的政部长,私有这些福利,成本却由由群众共担(privatise the…

Three new cases of Zika reported, two from new cluster at Glasgow Road

National Environment Agency (NEA) reported two new cases of locally transmitted Zika…