On Thursday (5 March), Associate Professor Walter Theseira, a Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), urged the government to address the problem of food security in a Supply Debate Speech.

Assoc. Prof Theseira argued in his speech that though Singapore is a rich country, there are still many who struggle to afford sufficient healthy food.

The Assoc. Prof remarked, “Singapore was ranked by the Economist Intelligence Unit as the fourth most secure Food Nation in the world, yet nearly half of a sample of 236 families in Singapore have reported moderate to severe food insecurities. These were the findings of a 2018 report by the Hunger and Food Lover’s Paradise by the Lien Centre of Social Innovation Centre at Singapore Management University (SMU)”.

He added that there were some 125 food support groups operating in Singapore, in addition to food support from ethnic self-help groups and community organisations.

During the Budget Supply Speech, Assoc. Prof Theseira posed a pointed question. He asked, “A basic question is how much food is enough. But the question is, enough for what?”

According to the Assoc. Prof, the 2019 Minimum Income Standards study led by Dr Ng Kok Hoe of the Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, a single elderly household requires an estimate of S$400 for food, which is about 29 per cent of their budget.

He explained, “More importantly, that study reveals that Singaporeans consider food to be more than calories for the body; it is nourishment for the soul. It includes having meaningful choice and variety, the opportunity to eat healthily but also enjoy the occasional indulgence, and the chance to meet friends at the hawker centre or invite others to a home-cooked meal.”

He added, “It is not three restaurant meals a day. It is three meals with dignity.”

To illustrate his point, the Assoc. Prof Theseira quotes a study by Diana Ong from the Chinese Assistance Development Council and Dr Ong Qiyan from the Social Service Research Centre, National University of Singapore (NUS). The study revealed that lower income families who opt for healthier meals spend S$204 per month, per person.

This sum is much more than what a less healthy diet costs, which is S$168. The big difference in spending is not in eating out, but is in trying to eat a healthier home cooked diet, said the associate professor.

“These results are consistent with the food insecurity–obesity paradox that in a rich country, food insecurity manifests not as starvation, but as an inadequate and unhealthy diet that exposes the poor to risks of obesity and malnutrition,” he said.

Assoc. Prof Theseira also highlighted that though food insecurity here may not indicate starvation, it does contribute to the problem of people making difficult choices to choose between the nutrition of a family and having enough money for other necessities.

Because of this, many food charities have stepped up to bridge the gap that these families desperately require.

“Despite good intentions, charities are struggling to meet this varied needs,” the NMP explained.

Assoc. Prof Theseira then cautioned that though Budget 2020 aims to distribute S$100 per year in grocery vouchers to help needy households over the next two years, there is a need for a full Government food security programme.

In addition to that, the Assoc. Prof also broached the issue on his Facebook post yesterday. In his post, he explained that food security programmes should be designed to incorporate the need to improve health for families and children, not just for today but for years to come.

To him, there is ample evidence suggesting that nutrition in childhood and economic growth goes hand-in-hand. Therefore, he emphasised that there is a need to address and solve this problem.

“Food security programmes can improve health for families and children not just today, but many years later. There is increasing evidence of the link between nutrition in childhood, and economic and health outcomes years down the road. Let’s commit to officially measuring food insecurity and addressing it as a Government priority.” he wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Six arrested in Central Narcotics Bureau operation, drugs seized estimated to be worth S$423,000

In an operation conducted by the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) on Tuesday…

面包夹香烟最新暗黑早餐? 面包内藏私烟闯关被抓包

“有人要试试香烟三文治吗?” 移民与关卡局在脸书分享一则趣事,本月8日,该局官员在兀兰关卡发现,在巴士站入境厅有旅客行迹可疑,于是趋前要求检查。 这位马来西亚籍52岁男子,带着四包面包,但官员打开后,却发现内有乾坤,面包片中共藏着32包走私烟! 有关男子在接受调查后,已转交给新加坡关税局(Singapore Custom)处置。 有网民表示没见过这么奇葩的走私香烟手段,令网民打开眼界。 不久前,当局也曾从货柜罗厘,在放置包装纸巾的箱子内藏有私烟。

“Please stop hum-tumming Singlish! Just leebit alone!”

Andrew Loh – The Speak Good English Movement was officially launched on…

许通美:最低薪资制降低竞争力是假论述

巡回大使许通美教授,不认同那些声称最低薪金制将降低竞争力、影响经济乃至吓跑外资的说法,直言这都是”假论述“,企图制造民间对最低薪资制的恐惧。 许通美直言,不论是渐进式薪资制还是就业入息补贴,仍不足以让低收入劳工走出贫穷,关键在于,必须让劳工赚取足以维持生活的生活工资(living wage )。 许通美指出,过去政府也不赞同公共领域五天上班制,指出会侵蚀工作操守、减少竞争力或吓跑外资。但是在2004年,李显龙总理在2004年接任后,宣布把原有5天半制改为五天制,当时全民欢腾,人们几乎都忘了过去反对五天制的论述。 他强调,最低薪资制也不会减少竞争能力,不会为我国经济带来负面影响。 香港落实最低薪资  14万人脱贫 他举例,在香港,制定了约为1400新元的最低薪资,至少让14万脱贫,这是不小的数目。 “在香港、台湾、南韩和日本都有(最低薪资),但是都没出现失业或非法就业的问题。所以,为何要制造最低薪资制会影响经济的假论述?尝试营造恐惧?我是不会被这种假论述吓倒的!” 《海峡时报》在昨日举办一项圆桌对话会,邀请淡马锡控股主席林文兴、许通美、新加坡中小企业协会会长王崇健以及清洁公司Nimbus创办人之一汤信豪,探讨在破坏式经济时代下,国内劳动阶级的薪资模式。 从脸书隔空论战 …