Connect with us

Current Affairs

为减轻学费、生活负担 两年来大专“甜心宝贝”剧增

Published

on

大学学费频频上涨,部分大学生曾反映生活负担沉重;然而,争议性网络约会网站Sugarbook的统计,选择其他经济支援管道的大学生越来越多,有者选择兼职,有者选择成为“甜心宝贝”。

网上约会网站Sugarbook显示,从2018年至2019年期间,我国大学生注册人数跃升了32巴仙,意味着有更多大学生目前正在寻找能够提供经济支持的甜心爸爸或甜心妈咪。

所谓的甜心宝贝,就是指透过陪伴和约会来换取金钱或物质上的利益;而甜心爸爸或妈妈则是提供金钱或物质利益者。

据Sugarbook中标题为《调涨大学学费的另一解决方法:甜心约会》的报告中指出,全国有超过2000名就读大学的甜心宝贝是该网站会员。报告还列出了最多学生成为“甜心宝贝”的前十所大专。

新加坡南洋理工大学共有643名学生担任甜心宝贝,位居冠军,接着是拥有487名学生的新加坡管理学院,而身为“国际巨星”的新加坡国立大学屈居第三,具有413名学生。

令人咋舌的是,虽然只是较小的教会学校,但是新加坡神学院也榜上有名,共有12名学生选择成为甜心宝贝。

可成为甜心宝贝人生导师

该网站创始人达伦·陈(译音,31岁)指出,“由于学费不断飙升,负担不起昂贵的高等教育费用家庭,都被迫贷款缴费”。

“更糟糕的是,学生在求学时期,还必须处理多种工作和压力,最终因无法负担而选择辍学。平均来说,一名甜心宝贝每个月能够获得最多2000元的津贴,这对陷入困境的大学生而言,是很大的帮助。”

“甜心爸爸或妈妈不仅提供经济援助,还能充当生活导师,提供大量财务、人脉交流和职业发展等方面的指导,以提高有抱负专业人士在大学时期的职业和生活方式。”

甜心宝贝是一份工作

一名曾于1月份接受网络媒体AsiaOne访问的23岁女子,菲利斯·安(Felice Ang,译音)坦诚自己就是甜心宝贝,并分享了她的“甜心”生活。

她披露自己如何及为什么甜心约会、如何寻到甜心爸爸,并澄清提供性服务是否是工作的一部分。

她坦诚是透过大学同学了解到有关活动,而非如电视上所定义般透过可疑关系接触到。

据她的访谈中,其在餐饮业工作的双亲都难以承担得起她那昂贵的学生贷学金,而她身兼两个兼职所得也不足以缴付学费时,她就尝试了甜心约会。

菲利斯表示,她没有抱怨过工作上的物理性质要求,并事先设定了明确界限,这有助于让她和甜心爸爸保持互敬的亲密关系。

她透露,甜心爸爸主要付费让她陪伴在侧,她也从前者手中收到了如HP手提电脑、特别定制的潘多拉项链以及IPhone11苹果手机等奢侈品。

除了为她的陪伴付费,菲利斯还是透露了,她与两名甜心爸爸的关系自然发展成了性伴侣。两种关系是互斥的,她会把甜心爸爸当男朋友。

菲利斯表示,无论工作性质如何,都是有一些好处的。她分享了和一名35岁的离婚男子建立关系后,后者已经从失婚中振作起来,再次学习如何约会。

提及对已婚男子的概念时,菲利斯表示不能够接受和已婚男子发生关系,她坚信成为类似第三者的身份是有违道德的。

她在最终指出,甜心宝贝是一项真正的工作,也是发掘人际关系的好方法。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media

Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.

Published

on

On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.

Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.

According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.

Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.

He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.

In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:

  1. Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
  2. Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
  3. Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
  4. How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
  5. How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?

The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.

Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.

He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.

Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”

He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.

The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.

At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.

The Ridout Road saga last year centred on concerns about Mr Shanmugam’s rental of a sprawling black-and-white colonial bungalow, occupying a massive plot of land, managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), which he oversees in his capacity as Minister for Law. Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, also rented a similarly expansive property nearby.

Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.

As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.

Continue Reading

Trending