Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo

During the Parliamentary debate yesterday (3 Mar), Manpower Minister Josephine Teo told Parliament that about 1,000 firms have been put on the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) Watchlist presently.

Since the list was introduced in 2016 four years ago, firms that were placed on the list have hired more than 4,400 Singaporean PMETs, she noted.

“Our objective is not just to penalise errant employers. We want them to improve,” she said.

There is, however, no mention as to how long were the Singaporeans PMETs hired and whether they are still being hired.

Under the FCF, employers that do not consider hiring Singaporeans fairly will be barred from hiring new foreign professionals or renewing existing ones for a minimum of 12 months, up to a maximum of 24 months. Employers and key personnel who make false declarations on fair consideration will also be prosecuted.

To date since the list was introduced, a total of 3,000 Employment Pass (EP) applications have been rejected or withheld by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM), or withdrawn by employers, she added.

The salary criteria for hiring foreigners on an EP will also be raised. From 1 May, the minimum monthly salary for foreign professionals to qualify for an EP will go up from $3,600 to $3,900. “This increase is in line with improving wages of fresh graduates of local autonomous universities,” she pointed out.

According to the latest joint graduate employment survey published last Friday (28 Feb), the median gross monthly salary among fresh graduates in full-time permanent employment was $3,600 last year. So, the new minimum EP salary requirement of $3,900 is only about 8% higher than the median fresh graduate salary.

Ms Teo further announced that MOM will be stepping up measures to ensure fair hiring consideration in the workplace. Under the FCF, companies are required to advertise openings on the national Jobs Bank to give locals a chance to be considered first before they can submit their EP applications for foreign applicants.

This is to ensure fair hiring and guard against job openings being restricted to “closed circles of friends”, she said.

From 1 May, MOM will expand the advertising requirement to include positions paying up to $20,000 from the current $15,000. Job positions with salaries of $15,000 and above are currently exempted from the FCF job advertising requirement for hiring foreigners.

Jobs Bank a “wayang”?

Still, many netizens have commented that the Jobs Bank, supposedly set up by the government to encourage the hiring of more locals, is useless.

For example, a quick check on a forum frequented by foreign expats shows some companies are just putting up job advertisements on Jobs Bank for “procedural” purpose. They have no intention of hiring any locals since they already have a foreign candidate in mind:

From the forum thread, it appears that the company was ready to hire Amanda, a Malaysian Chinese, on EP even before it posted any job advertisements on Jobs Bank.

Amanda’s EP was said to have been approved just last Thursday (27 Feb). Perhaps Ms Teo might want to personally go check out if the job offered to Amanda by the company is being restricted to just “closed circles of friends”?

Companies caught for pre-selecting foreign job applicants and didn’t conduct any local job interviews

Together with the announcement of harsher penalties for discriminatory hiring practices in January this year, MOM named a few companies caught for flouting FCF.

One company, Ti2 Logistics Pte Ltd, was caught for making a false declaration to MOM. It submitted an EP application for a foreign job applicant for the position of business development manager. It had also advertised for the position of accounts manager on the Jobs Bank.

For the former role, it made a false declaration that it had interviewed two Singaporeans and considered candidates fairly when it had not done so. For second role, the firm also treated the job advertising requirement under the FCF as a paper exercise, posting a job description unrelated to the actual job.

In reality, it had already pre-selected an EP applicant for the business development position and had no intention to interview any Singaporean candidates. MOM charged the company with one count of making a false declaration to the Controller of Work Passes in its EP application. It has also been debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Like Ti2 Logistics, two other companies also did not interview any locals even though they had put up advertisements on Jobs Bank. Before putting up the job advertisement, Meyer Burger (Singapore) Pte Ltd had already interviewed a foreigner overseas and deemed him suitable for a process engineer post in Singapore. It then advertised the position on Jobs Bank for the purpose of applying an EP for him.

Meyer Burger did not carry out any interviews since it had already made up its mind to hire the foreign worker. The job advertisement was posted solely to make an EP application. MOM debarred the company from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Tarantula Global Holdings Pte Ltd similarly submitted an EP application for the position of senior IT support engineer. Like Meyer Burger and Ti2 Logistics, the company had pre-selected the EP applicant, who was a former employee of an affiliated overseas company. It put up a job advertisement, but likewise did not interview any candidates other than the chosen one. The company was debarred by MOM from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

Another company, Nihon Premium Clinic Pte Ltd, submitted an EP application for the position of regional customer development manager. It omitted listing critical key criteria in its job advertisement like the ability to speak fluent Japanese and Mandarin, when they were actually required for the job.

As a result, none of the job applications submitted was suitable for consideration as the local job applicants did not know that fluency in Japanese and Mandarin was required. Instead, an EP applicant recommended by one of the company’s shareholders was deemed suitable after an interview.

For not giving fair consideration to Singaporean candidates, Nihon Premium Clinic was debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

All these companies could have avoided legal troubles with MOM if they had taken the trouble to at least “wayang” a bit to interview some local candidates.

In such cases, the companies can still give the excuse that they have interviewed the locals and did not find any of them suitable. It would then be difficult for MOM to find fault with these companies.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jose Raymond calls for civil action taken on instructor and Sport Singapore for causing the death of a six-year-old due to negligence

In December 2017, six-year-old Sherlyn Ler, who did not know how to…

改建私宅成客工宿舍,还企图行贿! 中国籍男子判四周监禁罚逾五万元

一名外籍人士擅自将私人住宅改成客工宿舍,被发现后还企图行贿执法人员,因此被判处四个星期监禁,罚款5万6000元。 市区重建局、人力部和贪污调查局(CPIB)联合发表文告表示,市建局去年2月24日在接获通报后,到麦波申的惹兰克马朱安的私宅进行突击检查,却发现里面住了15个人,已超过规定的六个人。 经调查后,该私宅是由28岁中国籍男子李应(译音,Li Ying)2017年4月租下,但他却将房子分割成更多的床位,并将床位转租给外国客工。 分租床位给客工 据悉,他签下为期两年的租期,自2017年至2018年共向21名客工收取共1万5620元作为房租。 在搜查期间,李应还企图贿赂执法人员100元,要求他不要将真实数据上报市建局,但最终执法人员拒绝,并将此时上报市建局。 最终被告因涉嫌贿赂与违规,被判处四周监禁与5万多元的高额罚款。 市建局提醒业主与租户必须遵守私人住宅条规,例如入住上限为6位、以及最短期限为至少3个月以上。屋主有监督责任,检查房屋是否被用于非法业务。 根据《规划法》(Planning Act)规定,在未经许可下扩建私宅为宿舍,将可能被处以最高20万罚金,或监禁一年,或者两者兼施。 此外,根据《新加坡外籍劳工雇佣法》(EFMA),外国人务必持有工作准证,方能在我国工作,一旦发现无有效工作准证,将可能被处以两万元,或最高两年监禁或两者兼施。而违规者将可能会被禁止在新加坡工作。

Abuse of elderly woman – MSF looking into incident

The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) says it is looking…

Ng Eng Hen urges servicemen to speak out on violations, but there no reassurance that those who do will be protected

Following the recent National Service (NS) training death and subsequent discussions about…