Singapore’s Minister of Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam is “really helping” the Hong Kong police “do their job” by alleging the [international] media of “one-sided portrayal” of protests in Hong Kong, said Washington Post’s Southeast Asia and Hong Kong bureau chief Shibani Mahtani.

Ms Mahtani, a Singaporean formerly with The Wall Street Journal, slammed Mr Shanmugam on Twitter yesterday (2 March) for his recent remarks in Parliament regarding the Hong Kong protests.

In her thread, Ms Mahtani summarised Mr Shanmugam’s comments as “protests are bad, should continue to be banned, good governance will keep people happy, carrot + stick approach”.

She pointed out that no reference was made to Hong Kong’s district council elections in Mr Shanmugam’s remarks — which overwhelmingly favoured pro-democratic politicians — or the approval ratings gained by the city’s Beijing-backed chief executive Carrie Lam.

During the Committee of Supply debate in Parliament yesterday, Mr Shanmugam used the events in Hong Kong as an example to talk about public security.

“Some of them have engaged in extremely violent, disruptive behaviour, with the whole purpose of crippling the government, and inflicted severe damage to the economy, and to the reputation of the city,” adding that the protests obviously caused very severe challenges for the Hong Kong police force.

He then praised the Hong Kong police force as one of the finest in Asia and as being highly regarded in the region along with the Singapore Police Force.

Mr Shanmugam claimed that the Hong Kong police were caught between the need to uphold public order when the protests broke out and fending off “protestors who resorted to increasingly violent tactics just to attack the police and instigate them”.

“That has, I would say, severely damaged the relationship between the police and the public,” he said.

Mr Shanmugam then went on to attack the media, saying:

This is not helped by the one-sided portrayal of the situation in the media, in particular the international media, which often focused on criticising only the police force. The demonstrators were always titled pro-democracy protestors, while the police always were mentioned with reference to their brutality, and their brutal response. The first time a police officer fired a live round, the media depicted the incident as an example of police brutality, and the picture went around the world. But, all the events leading up to that point were ignored. Protestors, as I said, were often portrayed in a positive light. That the police were being attacked, their lives were frequently in danger, their families were being exposed — all that was ignored.

Hong Kong netizens criticise Singapore as authoritarian

Replies to Ms Mahtani’s tweet — mostly from Hong Kongers — mostly pointed out that they were not surprised by Mr Shanmugam’s take on the issue given that Singapore is also an “authoritarian regime”.

An American netizen named Chelsea pointed out that all protests against governments are wrong in the view of authoritarian regimes.

   

Netizen ElTeee claimed that Singapore is afraid of its citizens questioning the ruling party.

A couple of other Hong Kongers said that Mr Shanmugam’s comments were unsurprising, as Singapore is looking to claim the title of “Asia’s Financial Hub” from Hong Kong.

A few other netizens pointed out that Mr Shanmugam’s remarks ignored why Hong Kongers took to the streets in the first place.

One person noted that Mr Shanmugam’s point on good governance is important, highlighting that the city’s government was already in shambles, which led to the protests.

Ms Mahtani, in a reply to a netizen, also questioned Mr Shanmugam’s narrative as being one-sided as well.

A Singaporean netizen, however, supported Mr Shanmugam’s comments, and stressed that Singapore is a “democracy”, not an authoritarian society as some Singaporeans might believe.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Politicians online – look for them here

Social Media (or New Media) is expected to play a part in…

武汉冠状病毒:今早再有五人确诊 女导游出院

卫生部今晚(15日)发文告指出,本地今早再增加五起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中三人和在神召会恩典堂工作的第66例有关。 这使得本地确诊病例增至72起。 与此同时,此前带广西旅行团到访永泰行的确诊32岁女导游(第24例),治愈出院,本地累计出院人数增至18人。该名女导游的丈夫(第25例)是在本月12日出院。 第66起病例在神召会恩典堂工作,而今早确诊的第68(79岁女公民)和第70例(27岁女公民)则是前者家属。第71起病例(25岁男公民)则和他有接触过。 迄今,和神召会恩典堂有关的病例,已累计16起。 至于实里达航空岭工地再增加一起病例,是26岁的孟加拉籍客工(第69例)。迄今该工地已累计有五起确诊病例。(第42、 47、 52 、56和69例) 第72例,则是40岁中国籍的工作准证持有者,但近期未曾回中国。他和第59例(61岁私人医院麻醉医生)有关联,但不是后者的病人。 第63起病例为公用事业局职员 另一方面,卫生部透露,昨早确诊的第63起病例(54岁女公民,近期未到过中国)在公用事业局工作,她和神召会恩典堂感染群有关。…

Traveler from SG sparks latest COVID-19 outbreaks in China despite 2 weeks of quarantine

The South China Morning Post reported yesterday (13 Sep) that COVID-19 has…

受武汉冠病疫情影响,泰国下令禁出口手术口罩

受武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)影响,泰国政府已下令禁止所有外科手术口罩的出口,确保口罩能够满足国内需求。 综合泰媒报道,卫生部国内贸易厅厅长威猜21日表示,副总理兼商业部长朱林已签下中央委员会公告就商品价格和服务管控出口卫生口罩事宜,禁止出口口罩到国外,以防止国内口罩断货。 当地原本规定,民众可出口/带出境500个或500个以上的口罩,但必须事先向国内贸易厅进行申请。然而,在限制出口口罩数量的同时,却发现有人利用出口低于500个口罩的方式,一天寄送10多次。 因此, 为了杜绝这种钻漏洞行为,泰国商业部祭出更严格的措施以全面禁止口罩出口,但两种条件下可携带口罩出境,即仅能携带30个以下的口罩;在持有医生证明的情况下,可以携带不超过50个的口罩出境。 至于普通类型的出口,已设立小组委员会核实情况,由商业部、卫生部人员共同审核按情况需求许可进行出口,例如寄送口罩给大使馆、援助邻国、特殊卫生口罩不适合泰国人使用或者出口不是为了交易或赚取利润。 疫情未见缓和,多国严控口罩出口 日前,贸工部长陈振声曾指如果全民戴口罩,可能国内马上口罩短缺,因此呼吁健康的国人无需戴上口罩,将口罩留给身体不适的国人。 而且他出席新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的一项闭门会议时,向与会者解说政府处理口罩问题面对的难处,期间更揶揄一小撮国人到超市疯抢日用品囤货、抢购口罩的行为“下衰”,认为是“白痴”(idiots)行径。 虽说口罩“一罩难求”,但与此同时,仍有人可以在本地大量买口罩送出国。本社此前报道,身在新加坡的武汉人,日前购买240箱口罩和其他各地的救援物资,以便支援家乡的亲友们。他们表示,并希望不要通过红十字会,直接为武汉医院送口罩。于是,就在年初二下午3时蹲守工厂,购下了200箱口罩。 最终在年初三凌晨运抵上海,而湖北省人民政府也为这批职员准备好了相关文件,以专车调度后运往武汉。 除了我国以外,多国也严格把控口罩出口。日前,台湾和澳门也先后宣布限制公众购买口罩的数量,购买时必须登记身份,让政府纪录购买的数量;而香港则因未加以管制导致口罩供应不足…