Economist Yeoh Lam Keong said that the portrayal of countries with unemployment insurance (UI) inaccurate having persistently high unemployment is inaccurate at best and misleading at worst”.

This was one of the three points that Mr Yeoh had outlined in response to the parliament exchange between Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo and Worker’s Party (WP) MP Sylvia Lim who had proposed that UI be implemented for older workers who have been retrenched.

In his Facebook post on 27 February —  the former GIC Chief Economist, explained that 25 out of 27 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development  (OECD) developed countries operated an unemployment insurance system including countries with low unemployment. The examples he listed include Germany, Japan, Switzerland, Korea and Taiwan—some of which are more competitive expert economies and have lower unemployment when compared to Singapore.

Next, Mr Yeoh pointed out that there is “little evidence of an inefficient reduction in incentive to work in properly designed UI systems” as claimed by Ms Teo.

“In fact, the labour market evidence shows that UI for about 3 months enables optimum job search that prevents workers from jumping at the first job that may not be such a good match for their skills or experience,” said the veteran economist.

Finally, he said, “Minister Teo seems oblivious to the trend that artificial intelligence is already increasingly replacing both unskilled and skilled workers and consigning them to a gig economy of much more frequent job shifts, often with lesser paying work.”

Mr Yeoh elaborated that there are en estimated 25,000 to 30,000 households that fall into poverty at any one time due to involuntary unemployment, adding that the lack of an automatic unemployment protection system will cause many to “fall through the cracks” of the country’s Commcare and skills retraining systems.

He concluded, “Not putting in place an intelligent unemployment protection system is thus short sighted, inhumane and just poor manpower policy, [in my honest opinion].”

However, Mr Yeoh also credited Ms Teo for her promise to “keep an open mind” on the issue.

“Let’s hope it is open enough to see the above arguments and the big picture that Singapore still lags the developed world in many areas of much needed social protection,” he said.

Apology for “mis-reporting” Ms Teo

Mr Yeoh apologised yesterday (1 March) on Facebook for “mis-reporting” Ms Teo and “confusing The Independent and perhaps the public”.

Mr Yeoh was referring to his post on 27 February which was then reported on by online local news site The Independent the next day, which the economist said used a “sensationalistic and inaccurate headline quote” from him which was “lifted entirely out of context”. The economist said that he strongly objects to and disagrees with that headline.

He explained further down,

“The full quote should be :

“ Unfortunately Manpower Minister Josephine Teo does not seem to have sufficient understanding of labour market economics to understand the important need for unemployment insurance in Singapore for at least three reasons” which has quite a different, specific and qualified meaning.

Mr Yeoh added, “For the record, I did not mean to say that Minister Teo’s overall understanding of labour market economics was insufficient per se.”

Regarding his own mistake in the earlier post, Mr Yeoh quoted the erroneous sentence which was: “Minister Teo’s portrayal that companies with UI “usually have persistently high unemployment “ is inaccurate at best and misleading at worst.”

He explained that he meant to say ‘countries’, not ‘companies’.

He went on to clarify, “Hopefully the very next paragraph conveyed that my intended meaning was clearly “countries” and not “companies”.

Mr Yeoh said he has corrected his original post accordingly and hopes that The Independent would make note of the correction and made the necessary amendments to their article.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

首以副总理身份发表劳动节集会演说 王瑞杰称行动党不抛弃工友

全国职工总会劳动节集会在昨日(5月1日)举行,财政部长王瑞杰,也首次以副总理身份,首度在该集会上发表主旨演说。 他再次重申职工运动一直都是人民行动党最重要的伙伴,全国职工总会和行动党的亲密共生关系,是新加坡独特而宝贵的劳资政三方合作关系的基础。 “今天是我首次以行动党下一代领导班子领军人物身份,对大家发言。”他如是告诉现场群众。 称不会抛弃工友 他也和历任总理一样,重申了建国总理李光耀50年前在职总现代化研讨会上做出的承诺,保证行动党和职总的亲密共生关系,将会在第四代领导层以及往后继续下去。” 王瑞杰称行动党珍视和职总关系,并向工运承诺,行动党永远都不会抛弃工友。 同时,第四代领导班子会全心全意帮助年长工人继续就业。 话虽如此,摆在国内劳动者眼前的则是艰巨的挑战和竞争。过去,王瑞杰曾在南洋理工大学的一项活动, 呼吁国人应抱持信心和全球各地不同族群、言语和文化的人交流,并指出“大家不会想活在一个人人筑墙自保的世界。” 国内PMET的困境 他认为,我们必须加深对他人的理解,无论对方是新移民、我们的邻居、大学同侪、还是其他大学的学生,也鼓励学生参与大学间的交换学生计划。 其中一位与会学生,也对王瑞杰抛出问题,询问他对于放眼我国到2030年引进690万人口的立场。但他指出,我国的人口还不算过于稠密,还有其他都市比我国更拥挤,他也引述“城市规划之父”刘太格在2014年的提议,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。 然而,政府大开闸招揽外来人才定居我国,本土PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师)却面对越来越难找到工作的困境。…

【选举】李显龙:国会解散公共服务仍会运作

李显龙总理指出,和每届大选一样,在选举期间,公共服务仍会继续运作,为人民提供服务。 他指出,虽然每届大选都是如此,但是他还是要强调这一点,因为我国正处于冠状病毒19防疫期间,所以政府和相关部门的运作尤其重要,既保持国家经济运作也让大家保住饭碗。 因此,跨部门防疫工作小组会在陆续几周,持续跟进有关的防疫工作,而全国就业理事会也会在这段期间创造就业和培训坊,让企业、员工和家庭都获得援助和支持。 他强调,本届大选和以往有所不同,除了受到疫情影响之外,也是因为此次大选后所成立的政府,将会对未来作出重大决定,包括塑造国家未来的发展,以及国民的生计和生活水平。 就此,李显龙促请民众在做出决定之前,要慎重考虑,明智投票,以保障国家和人们的未来。

前进党批“泼马”不符透明问责原则 律政、通讯新闻部联合声明反驳

日前,新加坡前进党(Progress Singapore Party)发声明,,指目前《防假消息法》赋予部长权力,来宣布哪些消息内容是假的,但欠缺明确的阐释和标准,该党认为这并不符合透明和问责的原则。 不过,昨日(11日)律政部联合通讯及新闻部,发表声明反驳该党。 前进党的文告抨击,在未有明确阐释和标准的情况下,《防假消息法》赋权部长宣布哪些消息是假的。对此该部坚称,该法下要求部长明确说明为何相关内容存伪。如何定夺虚假讯息也有法律先例可循。 “近期动用《防假消息法》,对于消息为何存假,也有清楚解释。对此前进党和该党党员毕博渊先生也不否认,他自己的贴文存有不实信息。” 事缘前进党党员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),在上月底被政府援引《防假消息法》,要求更正网络贴文。 该部声明也重申,《防假消息法》需符合一定条件才能使用,再者也允许被指控者上诉。 律政和通讯及新闻部也指责,前进党声称部长可随意施加任何惩处。该部反驳部长可给予更正指示;如相关人士拒绝遵循,只有法庭可以施加惩处。 不过吊诡的是,本社记者重新阅读新加坡前进党在本月10日发表的声明,从头到尾都未指控部长可随意施加任何惩处。 反驳毕博渊的嘴可曾被堵住?…

Is one year National Service possible?

~by: Eric Tan Heng Chong~ All eyes are on the new slate…