Earlier this week, World Politics Review (WPR) released a 36-minute interview podcast with Cherian George, a Professor in the Department of Journalism at Hong Kong Baptist University. In it, the learned professor addressed Singapore’s new fake news law also known as Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).

A Singaporean himself, Prof George explained in detail his many concerns about POFMA. According to him, POFMA arms the government with excessive power that it can wield in any way it likes. The law, he says, has very little to do with “cleaning the information environment” like dealing with genuine problems such as the spread of hate propaganda.

In effect, Prof George says the Act erodes the trust the public have in the institutions of the government.

“You have to build trust in the institutions. Both in the government as well as in the press. And so on”, he quips.

This law, he explains, works counter intuitively as it kills the freedom of speech which includes good faith in journalism. As a result, it creates more cynicism in the eyes of the public.

“It tells people, we can’t even trust the academics. We can’t even trust good faith” he said.

Prof George also noted that the closest targets of POFMA in recent months have been alternative online news sites.

This is in reference to States Times Review (STR) being served correction orders on three separate occasions for publishing falsehoods on various issues, including the coronavirus situation in Singapore. Earlier this month, the STR Facebook page was designated a Declared Online Location (DOL) and an order for Facebook to ban access to the page in Singapore. This led to the page being effectively shut down and converted into a Facebook page for a different alternative news site called The Real Singapore.

Apart from this, the professor says that POFMA has been used to go after political opposition members who are just engaging in a public debate. Therefore, openly it can be seen as an abuse of the Act rather than its original intention to protect Singapore’s national security, he pointed out.

However, with the upcoming General Election, the Professor opines that POFMA will not hinder or limit the speech of opposition politicians. Over the years, the opposition members have become more experienced in navigating the Singapore political terrain.

At the same time, the Professor forecasts that the Act may be used against foreign media who operate with more freedom to cover the local elections.

Given that scenario, Prof George believes there could be a calibrated censorship where the government does not really impose open restrictions but instead creates a haze in the minds of journalists to self-censor themselves.

In response to a question by the interviewer on how people, as consumers of news, could be protected from falsehoods that is prevalent in the media, the professor proffered that the long term solution would involve pre-bunking instead of fact checking the posts. In other words, this means the minds of the public have to be cultivated not only to be more media literate but also to be more politically literate.

“You need to understand that there are more powerful interests in the information eco-sphere that is trying to manipulate some debates. You need to understand what their interests are. You need to understand, for example, who is behind the certain things you might hear. So it is to warn the audience, ahead of time to the kinds of manipulation that they are likely to face”, added Prof George.

The professor elaborated that this type of manipulation is “scapegoating”, especially when the blame is squarely placed on minority groups by politicians. It is understandable that there would be a manipulation of emotions, and therefore, when approaching issues such as these, the Professor recommends that people should be trained to practice scepticism and being objective.

On whether other Southeast Asian countries would follow Singapore’s footsteps to introduce similar laws, the Professor believes that this would not occur.

“I would predict a far greater push back against any such bill. These are countries that have bigger oppositions, more vocalized society, and fairly active legal communities. You probably would have lawyers on the streets, in Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries in Asia if something as extreme as Singapore’s law was ever mooted” he said.

The professor concluded, “Singapore is an unusual case of an illiberal regime that believes in doing things by the book to an almost obsessional degree. It’s been called ruled by law as opposed to rule of law, which is why you end up with this which is uniquely a Singaporean creature of a very detailed sophisticated written statute to achieve what most non democracies would simply do by fear.”

Last year, the professor had written an exhaustive document entailing his observations and concerns that he had on the law.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国际特赦组织剥夺昂山素枝“良心大使奖”

国际特赦组织今天宣布,收回颁发给缅甸实质领导人、国务资政昂山素枝的“良心大师奖”(Ambassador of Conscience Award)。 缅甸军队对罗兴亚穆斯林犯下暴行,但昂山素枝却没有为遭受暴力的难民发声。 国际特赦组织秘书长奈度对此感到十分失望,称昂山素枝不再是“希望、勇气与永远捍卫人权的象征。” 该组织是在2009年颁发良心大使奖予昂山素枝,当时他还在软禁中。 “国际特赦组织无法为您仍具受颁良心大使奖的资格辩护,因此我们很难过地要就此收回这个奖。” Aung San Suu Kyi…

经济师预测 第二季经济年比将萎缩11.8巴仙

新加坡金融管理局发布最新经济师调查报告,指经济师预测今年第二季将年比萎缩11.巴仙。与此同时,今年经济增长预测,也下调到萎缩5.8巴仙。 这比起上一次调查的0.6巴仙预测还要低。 25名受访经济师,预测今年经济增长,可能萎缩介于4.1至6巴仙,但预计明年回弹4.8巴仙。 贸工部早前已下调对今年的经济预测,预计今年经济萎缩4至7巴仙。 冠状病毒19疫情在全球仍未消退,全球经济前景仍不明朗,相信这也致使当局决定下调今年的经济增长预测。  

Indian Fake COVID-19 certificates appearing in India

The Indian authorities have recently uncovered instances of fake COVID-19 medical certificates…