People are queuing up at Buangkok Station. (Image source: Wai Mun Hoo/Twitter)

There was a crowd of commuters queuing at MRT stations along the North-East Line (NEL) after the regular train service stopped due to a power fault on Thursday morning (27 February).

SBS Transit wrote on its Facebook earlier today at 5.49 am that the regular NEL train service is only available between Harbourfront and Buangkok MRT stations due to a power fault, adding that a shuttle train service will be provided between Buangkok and Punggol stations.

In an update at 6.23 am, SBS Transit said that it will provide free regular and bridging bus services at designated stops at affected MRT stations.

Later on at 8.20 am, SBS added: “Due to a power fault, there is only [service] on 1 platform [between] NE15 Buangkok & NE17 Punggol & shuttle trains are running [between] these [stations]. [Please] add extra travel time. Free regular & bridging bus [services] are also available. There is regular [service] [between] NE1 HarbourFront& NE15 Buangkok.”

In it’s most recent update at the time of writing, SBS noted that the train service between Hougang and Punggol will not be available in order to facilitate repair works starting from 10.40 am. It added that free regular and bridging buses will continue to be available at these four stations.

SBS added that the shuttle train service will run between Serangoon and Hougang stations while regular service between HarbourFront and Serangoon stations will run at intervals of 9 minutes.

Netizens irritated at the inefficiency of SBS Transit

Following the announcements of train service not working, many netizens lamented SBS Transit for its inefficiency in handling the problems while some netizens shared photos showing massive crowds forming at affected MRT stations on social media.

Some netizens condemned SBS Transit for giving contradictory and confusing announcements to the public that do not reflect the actual situation on the ground.

A few netizens also pointed out that problems with the train service tend to occur during the peak hours of working and school times.

One of the netizens, Donny Koh, even questioned why a power fault could result in not functioning of train services, wondering why there was no redundancy in place.

Other Twitter users also shared the photos and criticised SBS for the poor maintenance of its services.

https://twitter.com/dteo76/status/1232808562138550272

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Anwar says Dr Mahathir had nothing to do with the plot to form a new ruling coalition in Malaysia

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who has resigned as the prime minister of…

林文兴回应韩咏梅《疫情下的选举》

“13、12、14、17、23、47、32。可惜这些不是TOTO真字,而是自选区划分报告公布以来(本月13日),每日新增的确诊病例。” 新加坡民主党财政林文兴遗憾,尽管全球疫情仍严峻,但行动党仍散发应尽快召开选举的论调。 他在昨晚也发现,《海峡时报》翻译华文媒体集团新闻中心总编辑韩咏梅的评论《疫情下的选举》,直呼“世上哪有一家有声誉的媒体,除了吹嘘政治主子的自大方向外,还会去歌颂“疫情下的选举”?” 林文兴认为,任何的功绩都不可能掩盖无可克服的弊端:那就是让公众曝露在交叉感染的风险。 早前,已有多名在野政治人物和公民团体作出呼吁,认为当前全民应专注抗疫,绝不是选举的时机。 总理李显龙在上周六(14日)才在脸书贴文释放信息,指如需要在疫情过去签前选举,需采取必要防疫措施;隔日(15日)韩咏梅就发表评论附和领导人,更指“在大风大浪的时候, 全船人看着同一个大方向,这时,掌舵的人,对手只有风浪和自己。” 在韩咏梅这篇誌期本月15日的评论,她提到: “政府遏制疫情扩大的工作进行中, 加上面向民间的新加坡保洁运动以及保持社交距离, 不让病毒进一步传播,预计一个月后,冠病疫情虽不可能完全消退, 但很可能减弱。如果全球疫情一年内不可能完全消除,…

NSL experienced delay for second time this week

Commuters took to social media, complaining that North-South Line is experiencing delay…

“探讨如何衡量公民社会成熟度” 尚穆根疑曲解韩俐颖原意

日前,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,声称新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预。他更点名历史学者覃炳鑫和自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人,去年8月30日前往马来西亚吉隆坡拜会马国首相敦马,吁请后者带头把民主带到新加坡等东南亚国家。 此外,尚穆根不忘挑起,覃炳鑫与韩俐颖也曾联名申请成立公司,但使用外国资金在新加坡推动民主和人权等课题。 他更指出,韩俐颖曾在一段视频中指出,新加坡不如香港,没有50万人上街游行,她希望透过《新叙事》(New Naratif)主办课程,改变这点。 对于尚穆根的指控,韩俐颖也在个人博客指出,尚穆根所说的视频,应是指自己在2016年,于新民巷主办“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛上发表的言论。然而, 后来竟被谣传是,她希望新加坡可以像2019年的香港一样。(莫非韩俐颖有预知能力,当时就知道三年后香港的局面?) 她说,自己在2016年的言论,被一些亲行动党的网络“喷子”(troll)粉丝网页拿来断章取义和恶搞,难道部长的实际消息来源,是来自这些喷子网页? 韩俐颖还原当时说了什么 她解释,自己实际上在致词中说,如果要以香港50万上街的人数,来衡量所谓公民社会运动成功的标准,新加坡不如香港。但是,“50万人上街”(就是走上街头的人数)绝不是有效的KPI标准,来衡量一个国家公民社会的力量和成熟度,社群网络间的团结也很重要。 如果有行之有效的民主程序,那最好,就不需要有50万人上街诉求;但是一个能运作的民主,仍需要一个成熟和有韧性的公民社会。 这意味着,她从头到尾,都没讲过要靠《新叙事》课程主办的课程,来改变新加坡不如香港没50万人上街游行这点;更何况,《新叙事》迟至2017年9月才成立,在她发表相关言论时《新叙事》根本不存在。 她在博文中感叹,当自己参与本地公民社会活动的同时,也没少成为霸凌或恶搞的对象;而有关“外国势力干预”的说法,也由那些亲行动党脸书专页等宣传放大,故此如政府将来推出新法来应对“外国势力”,也不感到意外。…