Changi Airport Immigration (Image source: Kalxinli/Flickr)

A 45 year-old Chinese man lost his Singapore permanent resident (PR) status for breaching the requirements of a Stay-Home Notice (SHN) after attempting to leave the country.

As the man had travelled to China in the past 14 days, he was asked to serve the notice last Thursday (20 Feb) and was briefed on the SHN requirements, said the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) earlier today (26 Feb).

However, the man did not respond to phone calls and was not at home when ICA officers conducted enforcement checks in the days after his return to Singapore.

According to ICA, the man was spotted trying to leave Singapore 23 February.

He insisted on leaving despite being warned that he had breached the notice requirements, said a spokesperson from ICA.

Due to the breaching of notice requirements, the man’s application for renewal re-entry permit has been rejected by ICA, which allows his PR status to be retained while outside of Singapore, though he will be barred from re-entering Singapore.

“The Government will continue to conduct regular random checks through house visits and phone calls to ensure compliance with the Stay-Home Notice, so that the well-being of the community is not put at risk,” noted ICA.

ICA stated that Singapore PR who fails to comply with the SHNs, he or she may be prosecuted under Section 21A of the Infectious Diseases Act and re-entry permit or passes may be revoked.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Performance-related pay doesn’t encourage performance

London School of Economics research shows opposite effect of performance-based pay.

Lee Hsien Yang shares photo of late Lee Kuan Yew’s favourite carpet on his father’s fifth death anniversary

On Monday (23 March) morning, Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), younger son…

10囚犯特赦申请遭总统驳回 律师团体震惊

马来西亚捍卫自由律师团今日发文告,对于大批特赦申请被新加坡总统拒绝,认为是“令人震惊且史无前例的”,该律师团顾问苏仁德兰认为,“这似乎意味着新加坡完全无视国际司法规范和舆论,准备狂热行刑(execution binge)。” 捍卫自由律师团呼吁新加坡政府在全面审核所有特赦申请前,暂缓所有处决。 苏仁德兰批评,如此多死囚的特赦申请同时被拒绝,令人质疑这些死囚的陈情,是否有获得总统和新加坡内阁充分斟酌审核。 “在宪法权利保障下,囚犯的特赦申请理应获得充分、合乎法理的考量。” 过去一周有近10位囚犯的特赦申请被新加坡总统驳回,这已创了新纪录。“我们相信实际被驳回的特赦申请,可能比我们目前所得知的消息更多。” 在这10位囚犯中,有四位涉及毒品相关指控的马国人: i) Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah ii)…

因路线意见不同 司机乘客争执不断

透过第三方进行召车服务,有时会遇到司机说要“要跟我的路”,而乘客说“我还钱要听我的”的情况,但是网民认为其实大家要多体谅和互相尊重,更不应该故意刁难司机,“他们的收入在这困难时期已经变的更少了”。 网民Kenneth Chan昨早(9月28日)在脸书上帖文,分享发生在德士上的司机和乘客之“公说公有理,婆说婆有理”事件。 Kenneth指出,乘客当时通过德士公司或第三方的召车程序召车,虽然车费便宜,但是必须根据GPS导航系统所制定的路线,非常复杂。 帖文中,网民分析道,类似情况对乘客来说较为有利,因为车票便宜,可以最大限度地“驱使”司机,路途长。但是对司机而言,却是花时间和汽车燃料的。“看看这乘客如何欺负德士司机……就因为是他付款……他其实可以不用这样要求的,可以很好的询问是否能够解决问题。” Kenneth Chan表示,他了解司机的状况,他若通过第三方应用程序或召车应用程序接受载客,就必须遵守导航上的中央高速公路(CTE)路线。但是,德士司机在接到这名乘客之前,似乎刚刚经过中央高速公路时看见该处塞车或交通拥挤,因此决定在接到乘客后,因意见不合而发生争执。 乘客要求使用中央高速公路,完全不考虑司机的意见,就算司机已经尝试解释说该处塞车。“很显然的,乘客并没有将司机的困难放在眼里,对司机而言,时间就是金钱,而塞车将导致司机付出沉重的代价。” “如果是现场召车或用德士计程表计费,或许乘客就会同意司机所建议的,没有堵车的路线了。这能造就双赢局面,乘客提早抵达目的地,而司机也能够有时间赚取更多收入。” 网民同时批评道,似乎很多本地人都有这种态度,都是‘我’、‘我’、‘我的’的心理。而且对于短片中乘客的“我付钱,我有权拒绝”一席话,他认为司机在面对如此无礼对待时,也有权利取消订单,拒绝任何付款方式并请乘客下车。 他希望司机能够获得和一般人同样的对待和尊敬,更何况若他一天下来都面对类似的刁难客,心情怎么不会差?“最重要的是,他们需要注意路况,还要面对其他的无礼驾驶者和乘客、长时间待在车龙中,尤其是人有三急的时候,这些种种都是为了应付房租和车油费,收入也因这困难时期而变得更少。” 他坦承难以责怪这些脾气暴躁的司机,因为他们都受困于这些烦躁的框架中。“他们之中,有些也是很友善的人士,甚至是很好的谈话对象。”…