Connect with us

Current Affairs

比拉哈里评中国体制与抗疫 遭中驻新使馆斥“傲慢与偏见”

Published

on

本月24日,我国外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里,在《海峡时报》发表长文,以《中国的拐点和中国共产党的根本困境》(China’s inflection point and the CCP’s fundamental dilemma)为题,评述当前疫情反映中国强弱之处,疫情也削弱了中国人民对中共政府的信任。

比拉哈里也是新加坡国大中东研究所主席。不过,他的评论遭来中国驻新加坡大使馆发言人措辞严厉的反驳,指责其文章“疑抹黑中国政治制度和中国共产党的领导体制,与西方反华势力的陈词滥调别无二致。”

该使馆称,比拉哈里的言论是在中国人民抗疫的时刻,却在意识形态上对中国进行诋毁,兜售他一直以来对中国的偏见甚至敌意,“不得不说是有失道义。”

文告称拒绝“戴着有色眼镜的傲慢与偏见”,“逢中必反”,也指比拉哈里把疫情归咎于中国政治体制,但“习近平总书记亲自指挥、亲自部署”抗疫,“为其他国家和地区的防控工作赢得宝贵时间。”

比拉哈里:疫情削弱人民对中共政府信任

比拉哈里的文章说了什么?称当前武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情反映中国强弱之处,先是提到全球有哪个国家可以一口气隔离有六千万人口的省市、10日内建好医院?

不过他话锋一转,又质问是什么导致必须采取如此严苛的措施?显而易见, 是地方官员未及时上报坏消息,才导致病毒传播;至于武汉市长还称,“需得到北京的许可才能发布此类敏感消息”。

他提到中国是“列宁主义国家”,党对国家和社会各层面都要又绝对掌控;但邓小平当初看见其中缺陷并大刀阔斧改革。然而,当前的冠状病毒疫情危机,亦可能是中国面临最根本挑战的征兆。

“中共政治哲学与经济哲学相冲突”

文中也提及,中国面临的“根本困境”,是中共政府的执政正当性来自于经济表现,而列宁主义国家的本质是控制,然而市场效率则意味着较少控制;比拉哈里形容中国面对的困境核心可以简化为:列宁主义国家的政治哲学与经济哲学相冲突,形成难以打破的循环。

“中共的谨慎和对失去控制的恐惧是可以理解的。一个在短时间内经历如此空前规模的社经转变的泱泱大国,自然在内部动荡不安,因而可能不稳定。”

他续指当前疫情也削弱了中国人民对中共政府的信任。尽管他因为过去改善了亿万群众的生活,惟公众对此次处理疫情危机的愤怒是显而易见的,甚至于疫情爆发前,中国精英群体对习近平的内部批评也有所增加。

称中共政府具适应能力

不过,比拉哈里相信在疫情过去后,中方将严正看待医疗体系内曝露的危机。但是否会延伸到对掌控和经济效率的新平衡检讨,犹未可知。他也指中国不会倒下,而中共乃是由适应能力的组织,“它继承了一个多世纪的政经、社会实验经验。但与改革初期相比,中国目前面临的困境和取舍更加复杂,艰巨。”

使馆:鞋子合不合脚,自己穿了才知道

尽管比拉哈里对中国“有赞有弹”,似乎仍引来中国驻新加坡使馆的严厉挞伐,也比喻“鞋子合不合脚,自己穿了才知道”,指国家发展道路是否正确, 需看是否符合该国的实际情况。

使馆文告补充,过去70年中国实现富强的跳跃、八亿人口脱贫等,“人类发展史上绝无仅有,是中国共产党的坚强领导和中国特色社会主义制度下取得的。”

文告称中国的政治制度和发展道路,是历史和中国人民的选择;“比拉哈里先生无法否认中国的巨大成就,却对创造这一成就的政治制度和领导体制进行责难,不得不说这在逻辑上自相矛盾。”

文告称尽管中国前进道路仍有许多挑战,惟他们的信心和方向不会动摇,“中国正在努力推进治理体系和治理能力现代化,我们欢迎建设性的意见和建议,但坚决反对戴着有色眼镜的傲慢与偏见。”

文告续称“ 这种傲慢与偏见表现为逢中必反,手法为攻击中国的政治制度和道路模式”,动机就是“见不得中国好”。

以下为使馆官方网页,针对比拉哈里文章的反驳文告:

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending