Expressing her disgust over a report by the Sunday Times, Dr Lee Weiling posted on her Facebook page, saying: “I am appalled and disgusted by the The Sunday Times reports that seek to character assassinate my brother and his wife.”

The Strait Times’ Sunday newspaper report, “Disciplinary Tribunal finds Lee Suet Fern guilty of misconduct in handling founding PM Lee Kuan Yew’s last will“, wrote that Mrs Lee Suet Fern was found guilty of grossly improper professional conduct in her handling of the last will of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew by a Disciplinary Tribunal that was appointed by the Chief Justice, Sundaresh Menon.

The report highlighted how Mrs Lee is being described by the two-judge tribunal, as a “deceitful witness, who tailored her evidence to portray herself as an innocent victim who had been maligned” and how Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s conduct was “equally deceitful”.

Dr Lee referred to the report by the Disciplinary Tribunal report on Mrs Lee as “a travesty”.

The Sunday Times report also state how the Disciplinary Tribunal commented that the facts exposed an “unsavoury tale” of how the couple persuaded Mr Lee Kuan Yew, who was in poor health, to sign a new will without his usual lawyer to advise him — which in turn raises questions over Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s plans for 38 Oxley Road property in his final will.

She went on to say, “This all is yet another attempt to rewrite history following on from the secret ministerial committee looking into Lee Kuan Yew’s Will and wishes for 38 Oxley Road. My father knew full well what he was doing. He was clear in his decision for the Will. Lee Kuan Yew on his own drafted an amendment to the Will (a codicil) and executed it 2 weeks later.”

She added, “I continue to be ashamed at Hsien Loong’s disrespect for his father’s dying wish.”

The Disciplinary Tribunal was brought about last year after the Attorney-General’s Chamber referred a case of “possible professional misconduct” case on the part of Mrs Lee, who is formerly a managing partner at law firm Morgan Lewis Stamford, to the Law Society.

AGC stated: “Ms Lee appears to have prepared the Last Will of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and arranged for Mr Lee Kuan Yew to execute it, despite the fact that her husband, Mr Lee Hsien Yang, is one of the beneficiaries under the Last Will”, and that his “share increased under the Last Will”.

Citing the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules, AGC alleged that “(Mrs) Lee’s conduct appears prima facie to be in breach of Rules 25 and 46 of the Professional Conduct Rules”, and that the rules necessitate lawyers to avoid or remove themselves from “a position of conflict”.

Attorney General, Mr Lucien Wong is said to have recused himself from this case as he was Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer who assisted him on matters surrounding the 38 Oxley Road property.

Contention of the demolition clause

 

According to the seventh and last will of late Lee Kuan Yew, founding Prime Minister of Singapore, the property at 38 Oxley Road where he lived all his life, should be demolished, after his death or at the point where his daughter, Dr Lee no longer lives there.

However, this demolition clause is not present in the sixth will — which has been the matter of contention in the public debates back in 2017 where Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong brought the matter to the Singapore Parliament after being accused of abusing his power by Dr Lee and her brother, Mr Lee Hsien Yang in a scathing public letter.

In the joint statement published on 14 June 2017, Dr Lee and Mr Lee Hsien Yang alleged that PM Lee Hsien Loong had abused his power and how the two are being threatened by the current government as a result of refusing to abide PM Lee’s desire to retain the Oxley road estate despite LKY’s wish to demolish the house after his passing.

In that statement, the two wrote, “The values of Lee Kuan Yew are being eroded by his own son. Our father placed our country and his people first, not his personal popularity or private agendas. We are very sad that we have been pushed to this. We feel hugely uncomfortable and closely monitored in our own country. We do not trust Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader. We have lost confidence in him.”

Most recently, Dr Lee appealed to Singaporeans in a Facebook post last September, to grant her father his unwavering wish.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民众不必惊慌 民防人员出勤皆穿戴防护服

无论是不是冠状病毒可疑病例,所有民防部队工作人员都必须穿上个人防护配备才能出动。 民防部队指出,自新型冠状病毒疫情以来,当局已处理219起可疑病例,且载送病患后,都会对救护车进行严格的消毒和清理工作。 当局指出,自从我国疫情警报提升到橙色级别后,无论是否处理确诊病例,救护车上的医护人员,都必须穿戴个人保护器具,因此促请民众不用过度惊慌。而目前,此措施也适用于所有的医疗病例。 内政部兼卫生部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏昨日下午到访巴耶利峇消防局,和前线紧急救护人员会面时指出,作出以上言论。“这是他们所必须执行的措施,民众不应该感到恐慌。” 接线员直接进行分类 民防部队指出,在大约一个月的时间内,大部分的电话都来自民众,有些则来自全科家庭医生以及综合诊所。 每次民防部队行动中心在接获医疗求助电话时,接线员都会直接进行分类,包括询问对方是否出现新冠病毒症状、是否自中国回来;一旦怀疑是新冠病毒,就会将此特殊信息转交给紧急救护人员,再由救护人员做进一步确认工作。 当紧急救护人员将病患送到医院后,就会马上脱下个人安全装备,并立刻进行消毒处理。 救护车消毒耗约20分钟 民防部队总医务官莎莉妮(医生)上校指出,将一般病患送到医院后,当局就会为救护车喷洒消毒液或用酒精擦拭;而载送新冠病毒等传染病的可疑患者后,当局则会使用特殊的喷雾消毒机进行约20分钟的消毒工作。 在询及民防部队紧急救护小组如何应对目前的需求时,安宁指出,我们时时为各种情况做好准备,也有安排待命队伍,“目前的安排还算不错”。 惟,民防部队仍然促请民众不要随意呼叫救护车,若出现身体不适的状况,应该到住家附近的全科家庭诊所就医,依据医生的建议行事。…

樟宜机场第五搭客大厦项目暂缓两年

受到冠状病毒19疫情冲击,我国樟宜机场第五搭客大厦(T5)项目也随之暂缓两年,交通部长许文远也表示,将观察冠病疫情的发展,进行调整。 基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远今日(16日)向媒体透露,第五搭客大厦的设计和格局也会进行调整,将相关安全措施考虑在内。 许文远也指出,航空业是目前受到疫情影响最严重的领域之一,尽管他对亚太地区的航空业有信心,相信今后将有能力回弹,但也坦言,航空业的恢复如今确实是个未知数。 针对疫情,他认为,在未找到疫苗前,疫情都有可能反弹,均对航空业和旅游业未来都产生影响。 “基于这些巨大的不确定性,我们正在进行一轮关于航空业的深入研究,以评估后冠病时代航空业的前景。我们认为几个月内应该很难得到答案,这可能需要几年时间,所以我们决定暂缓该项目。”

PSD: “Civil servants may volunteer to serve in grassroots organisations”

With reference to a Straits Times  article on Saturday, 26 February that…

58-year-old man claims threats of arrest and violence by police

[vimeo id=”132998075″ align=”center” mode=”normal”] An elderly Singaporean claims that he was wrongly…