Expressing her disgust over a report by the Sunday Times, Dr Lee Weiling posted on her Facebook page, saying: “I am appalled and disgusted by the The Sunday Times reports that seek to character assassinate my brother and his wife.”

The Strait Times’ Sunday newspaper report, “Disciplinary Tribunal finds Lee Suet Fern guilty of misconduct in handling founding PM Lee Kuan Yew’s last will“, wrote that Mrs Lee Suet Fern was found guilty of grossly improper professional conduct in her handling of the last will of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew by a Disciplinary Tribunal that was appointed by the Chief Justice, Sundaresh Menon.

The report highlighted how Mrs Lee is being described by the two-judge tribunal, as a “deceitful witness, who tailored her evidence to portray herself as an innocent victim who had been maligned” and how Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s conduct was “equally deceitful”.

Dr Lee referred to the report by the Disciplinary Tribunal report on Mrs Lee as “a travesty”.

The Sunday Times report also state how the Disciplinary Tribunal commented that the facts exposed an “unsavoury tale” of how the couple persuaded Mr Lee Kuan Yew, who was in poor health, to sign a new will without his usual lawyer to advise him — which in turn raises questions over Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s plans for 38 Oxley Road property in his final will.

She went on to say, “This all is yet another attempt to rewrite history following on from the secret ministerial committee looking into Lee Kuan Yew’s Will and wishes for 38 Oxley Road. My father knew full well what he was doing. He was clear in his decision for the Will. Lee Kuan Yew on his own drafted an amendment to the Will (a codicil) and executed it 2 weeks later.”

She added, “I continue to be ashamed at Hsien Loong’s disrespect for his father’s dying wish.”

The Disciplinary Tribunal was brought about last year after the Attorney-General’s Chamber referred a case of “possible professional misconduct” case on the part of Mrs Lee, who is formerly a managing partner at law firm Morgan Lewis Stamford, to the Law Society.

AGC stated: “Ms Lee appears to have prepared the Last Will of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and arranged for Mr Lee Kuan Yew to execute it, despite the fact that her husband, Mr Lee Hsien Yang, is one of the beneficiaries under the Last Will”, and that his “share increased under the Last Will”.

Citing the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules, AGC alleged that “(Mrs) Lee’s conduct appears prima facie to be in breach of Rules 25 and 46 of the Professional Conduct Rules”, and that the rules necessitate lawyers to avoid or remove themselves from “a position of conflict”.

Attorney General, Mr Lucien Wong is said to have recused himself from this case as he was Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer who assisted him on matters surrounding the 38 Oxley Road property.

Contention of the demolition clause

 

According to the seventh and last will of late Lee Kuan Yew, founding Prime Minister of Singapore, the property at 38 Oxley Road where he lived all his life, should be demolished, after his death or at the point where his daughter, Dr Lee no longer lives there.

However, this demolition clause is not present in the sixth will — which has been the matter of contention in the public debates back in 2017 where Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong brought the matter to the Singapore Parliament after being accused of abusing his power by Dr Lee and her brother, Mr Lee Hsien Yang in a scathing public letter.

In the joint statement published on 14 June 2017, Dr Lee and Mr Lee Hsien Yang alleged that PM Lee Hsien Loong had abused his power and how the two are being threatened by the current government as a result of refusing to abide PM Lee’s desire to retain the Oxley road estate despite LKY’s wish to demolish the house after his passing.

In that statement, the two wrote, “The values of Lee Kuan Yew are being eroded by his own son. Our father placed our country and his people first, not his personal popularity or private agendas. We are very sad that we have been pushed to this. We feel hugely uncomfortable and closely monitored in our own country. We do not trust Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader. We have lost confidence in him.”

Most recently, Dr Lee appealed to Singaporeans in a Facebook post last September, to grant her father his unwavering wish.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】5月14日新增752确诊

根据卫生部文告,本地5月14日新增752例冠状病毒19确诊。大多为住宿舍工作准证持有者,其中有两人是本地公民和永久居民。 本地累计确诊病例达到2万6098例。当局仍在搜集病例详情,并将在迟些公布细节。

马国变天启示录 学者:新国执政党正步国阵后尘

邻国马来西亚在509第14届全国大选一夜变天,85巴仙的高投票率,葬送国阵逾半世纪政权。希望联盟政府上台,逐一履行选举承诺,其一废除最不受欢迎的消费税、调查一马公司案件和宣布内阁减薪,短期内,让外界都看到不一样的“新马来西亚”形象。 默迪卡民调中心对723名巫统党员进行民调,其中40巴仙认为,人民拒绝纳吉是国阵败选主因,消费税和一马发展公司紧随其后。 前首相纳吉在接受《当今大马》采访时,询及国阵败选因素,认为是综合因素导致系统的崩溃,当中包括内部的破坏、自己人的弱点和态度未改变。 但他认为国阵打了积极一战,对国家未来愿景有明确规划。 “我想我们有好的成绩给人民交代,在国阵政府领导下大马经济宏观数据不错,经济表现强劲成长和发展都在持续、失业率很低,收入不平等也有改善,基尼指数(贫富不均指数)首次掉到4.0以下(超过4.0则有社会贫富不均威胁)、股市也很强劲。“ 纳吉继续提及令吉走强、企业机构现金资产水平提升。他辩称国阵政府照顾人民福利,例如降低所得税2巴仙、收入4千令吉以下不用缴税、每个阶层也获得许多豁免,但是国阵在选举惨败,仍令他无法理解,感到震惊和创痛。 老百姓兼多职过活,纳吉知吗? 纳吉也承认,烈火莫熄运动,也斗争了长达20年,才赢得政权。他预见国阵重新站起来举步维艰,但必须从困难中振作、要有耐心。 然而,或许纳吉并不明白,人民要看到不是账面上数据有多漂亮,而是因为受够了精英阶层朋党勾结势力做大,拉远了与基层的收入距离,当国阵自以为消费税为国家带来收入,普通老百姓切身的生活经济负担必须身兼多职过活,坐在布城里的纳吉并不察觉。 大马政治海啸:反映新加坡未来? 大马变天,仿佛是新加坡的一面镜子,约翰佳博大学政治经济助理教授碧洁薇丝就直言,致使国阵倒台的因素,同样也存在于新加坡。 她在《日经亚洲评论》撰写评论,阐述首先就是领袖层的问题,在眼前的就是哪位第四代领导人,有能力从李显龙手中继承总理宝座。…

NUS former educator Tan Ee Lyn shared students’ sexual harassment study on Straits Times

Straits Times (ST) senior correspondent Tan Ee Lyn left National University of…