Wuhan Medical Treatment Centre, where some patients are reportedly in quarantine (Source: Weibo).

The death toll from China’s new coronavirus epidemic jumped to 2,112 on Thursday after 108 more people died in Hubei province, the hard-hit epicentre of the outbreak.

Most of the deaths were in the provincial capital Wuhan, where the virus first emerged in December, according to the daily update from the Hubei health commission.

More than 74,500 people have now been infected with the new coronavirus nationwide.

Hubei health officials said there had been 615 new cases in Wuhan and 13 more elsewhere in the province.

However, the Hubei health commission said it was reducing the number of previously reported cases in a number of cities in the province by 279.

The adjustment meant a net increase on Thursday of 349 new cases across the province.

Even without the adjustment, the number of new cases was sharply lower than the daily updates of recent weeks. On Wednesday, there were 1,693 new cases reported in the province.

It was not immediately clear how the over-reporting had occurred.

– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Thai video that will move dog-lovers to tears

The Thais have again outdone themselves with the mastery of the production…

SG50 BBQ controversy: Tickets issued to manage crowd, says PA

The People’s Association (PA) says it had issued “a total of 4,800…

本社要求内政部撤回更正指示 遭高庭驳回

新加坡内政部于22日援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),对于马国捍卫自由律师团(LHL)、《网络公民》、雅虎新闻以及新闻工作者韩俐颖,发出更正指示。 本社已向内政部长尚穆根要求撤回指示,不过被部长驳回,为此本社在上月28日转向高庭上诉。即便准备法庭文件,都需要989元六角的费用,约占了本社运营成本的10巴仙。 昨日(19日)高庭作出判决,驳回本社的申请,高庭法官洪素燕(Belinda Ang)称本社的辩驳出现“两个严重错误”,首先误以为在《防假消息法》下对于“陈述”(Statement)还有其他诠释,实则在该法第17项下只有两种:“事实(fact)”和“意见(opinion)” 至于其他理智人士阅读本社有关报导,都会以为那是“事实陈述”。故此法官裁定本社在这一论点的辩述失败。 上月16日,本社报导捍卫自由律师团发表一篇新闻稿,指责樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。包括本社、雅虎新闻以及马国主流媒体,都有报导上述律师组织的声明。 本社在申诉中强调,报导中已对资讯作出均衡报导,也强调那是来自上述组织的的第三方指控,且本社亦有向内政部求证,惟未获得后者核实。 根据判决书,法官也认为本社应证实有关陈述的真实性,而不是由被告(指内政部)证实。 在《防假消息法》第17(5)项下,如有关人士未在新加坡传播有关陈述、有关陈述不是事实陈述/确实是真相,又或者技术上无法发出更正指示,高庭才可裁决撤回指示。 总检察署的论点是,内政部长对本社发出的更正指示,是针对有关樟宜监狱行刑手法的指控。且本社未能提出任何证据,来抵消举证的责任。 对此法官认为,本社的“举报辩护”(reporting defence)是基于对有关陈述的误解。…