Photo: cnalifestyle.channelnewsasia.com

According to Heng Swee Keat, the Deputy Prime Minister, the country has no plans in the short-term to loosen property measures. This is despite the clamours by developers to ease the measures which will penalize them in the event that they are unable to complete and sell new projects within five years.

Mr Heng stated that in a Bloomberg TV interview on Wednesday (19 Feb) that “It is not on our radar at this point because we need to make sure that we stabilize the economy and we address long term structural issues.”

In July 2018, the government put in place measures with the aim to limit the growth of house prices and stop land hoarding. After the purchase of the land, developers have five years to build and sell all property units. Failing to do so will mean that developers will be slapped with a 25 per cent levy, which is a measure that developers have deemed as punishing.

Prices have been increasing just 0.5 per cent in the fourth quarter, which is a testament to the effectiveness of the measures in arresting market prices. Also, sales have been fluctuating, as shown by the 15 per cent increase in transactions in January following a 54 per cent slump in the previous month.

Earlier in February, some developers gain the benefit when the government eased another restriction, which meant the exemption of listed companies with a strong connection to Singapore from the Qualifying Certificate regime. Under the Qualifying Certificate regime, development must be completed within five years by firms, and all units in the project must be sold within two years of its completion.

The regime has sparked speculation of further deregulations in the property measures, but Mr Heng commented that “They are reading too much into that.”

“In Singapore’s context, property is not just an investment, it is a home for people and we must make sure that we get that right. That everyone must feel that this is my home, this is something which I as an ordinary worker has something to look forward to,” Mr Heng concluded.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Commuters feel that LTA’s new security measures at MRT stations are unnecessary and time consuming

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) began the new security screening trials yesterday…

The Icing Room clarifies cake frosting incident

The Icing Room, which is part of the BreadTalk Group, has explained…

Pasir Ris ONE – HDB “closely monitoring the progress” of discussions

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) is “closely monitoring the progress” of…

AWARE:受害者反映对防性骚扰海报感不舒服

上周,妇女行动及研究协会(AWARE)对最新的防性骚扰犯罪海报表达看法,质疑将性暴力“明码标价”的意义,也认为海报没有考虑到受害人承受的创伤和痛苦。 “为什么我们必须在性暴力上“标价”,并判断它的价值?是否判刑一年,就显得比较“值得“?还是六个月?这对造成伤害的人又值多少?我们迫切需要改变对性暴力的讨论与界定。” 对此,新加坡警方也很快作出回应,表示设计理念是希望通过强烈的视觉效果,强调犯罪后果的严重性,以对潜在犯罪者起到威吓的作用,也指AWARE未事先咨询警方,且不理解设计理念。 针对警方回应,AWARE 于周日(17日)则回应,性暴力是社会中存在的问题,而作为性别平等倡导团体,AWARE 有责任教育公众如何看待性暴力问题。 AWARE 澄清公开评论并非针对警察部队,同时也支持警察试图传达的威吓信息,认可比起过去一些海报,将责任推卸到受害者身上,有着重大的进步。 然而他们忧心的是,新海报为罪行“标价”,以及犯罪者在海报内以手触摸女性部位的视觉效果。 “将价格与受害者比喻为商店货架上物品,仿佛只要犯罪者愿意支付该“价格”,便可实行犯罪行为。海报内并未明确说明犯罪行为是错误的,只是提到“代价不便宜”。使用这样的方法去宣传防犯行为,忽略掉受害者的经历,以及公众对受害者的同理心。” 有受害者反映对海报感不舒服 AWARE…