Current Affairs
冀望减少家庭负担 单亲妈妈五年申请租赁组屋仍无下文
一名单亲妈妈日前在社媒上发文申诉,指自己一直申请租住政府组屋数年都被拒,甚至先后致函了数位部长,包括向李显龙总理求助,但是都没有下文,导致孩子可能必须随着自己过上四处为家的生活,对政府承诺会照顾人民的“口不对心”做法,感到失望。
署名Chanel Koh的单亲妈妈于2月12日在脸书上帖出长篇文中,她细述了年轻时期所面对的困境,一直到婚后生子,面对家暴和破败婚姻后,重新想要拥有“自己的家”的心愿,以及所面对到租赁政府组屋的困境。
她也披露在申请租赁组屋过程中,曾经向多名“高官”求助,但之后音讯全无,或表示他们也无能为力。
她称,儿时亲睹父亲遭杀害、母亲入狱的困境,随后被送到阿姨家中,却遭到对方虐待,最后她离家出走,一直到三年后母亲获释为止。
在她20岁那年开始,即2015年至2016年期间曾经申请组屋租赁,也曾经数次致函基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远,但申请最后都不了了之,
她曾于2015年接获租赁单位回函,指她不符合申请资格,因为薪金已经达到了1800(包含公积金),且仍然有母亲和兄弟,虽然当时他们皆为阶下囚。
但是Chanel指出,1800元的薪金在除去缴纳公积金后,只剩下1440元,应付包括租金在内的一个月开支已经非常困难,“若有家人支持,母亲和兄长都没有入狱,我会申请租赁组屋吗?”
她之后于2015年11月6日致函新加坡总理李显龙,或许引起一些关注了,建屋局当时曾向她索取大量文件,但是到了2016年的农历新年后,就音讯全无了。
家暴离开丈夫
她于2016年3月28日再次致函政府组屋租赁部门,申请租赁一房式单位,同时也通过电子邮件向武吉班让单选区国会议员张俰宾博士求助。然而事情发生了一年多,她仍然没有接获任何帮助,并且还是在外组屋。
Chanel于2016年结婚,和丈夫一起居住,但是在生了两个孩子,却迎来了丈夫的暴力相向及不忠,因此她再次希望能够搬出去住,而且决定将孩子带在身旁。
当时在飞跃社区服务中心(Fei Yue Community Services)就职的她曾向社工咨询,对方却表示能介绍一些房屋或庇护所,而这些都不是她想要的。
这名单亲妈妈于2019年11月1日搬出了丈夫的住家,就打算申请政府组屋租赁,安置孩子。她致函向武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理求助,但是对方指联络了飞跃服务中心的员工表示“建屋局的规则就是规则”,他对此无能为力,必须依据建屋局的规则办事。
获飞跃安排住所但交通不便
只是,这回答让Chanel,以及孩子必须和她不断搬迁、居无定所的未来,感到非常崩溃。“我只是一个普通公民、一个母亲、某个人的女儿,只想申请一间两房式租赁单位,一直到我的离婚手续完毕,而判决后我会和孩子一起申请房屋。”
她指出,她于本月11日被赶出租屋后已无处可去,在飞跃安排下入住实龙岗的住家,也是唯一能够收留他们的地方,只是距离她的工作地点以及孩子学校,就相对的非常远。她指出,孩子在Tradehub 21的学校就读,而她自身则在亨德森工作,来回都非常耗时间,因此向有关社工反映了有关问题。
社工对她指出,若她入住实龙岗的住家,那将是她的临时住所,直到建屋局给予回复,或她在市场寻获租屋。社工认为在市场上找租赁屋子会比较有机会,毕竟Chanel的收入有2000元,已经超过了政府组屋的租赁户收入限额,而且她还未正式离婚。
Chanel感叹,难道2000元的收入正在减去公积金后,所剩下的1600元,对三个人的一个月开销和市场组屋租金就足够吗? “我只是想要租赁政府组屋,那么我的收入就足以支撑我和孩子们。”
她质问到,是否因为她还没有离婚、还能够负担公开市场的租金,所以才不愿意让她租赁政府租屋。“你还想我和孩子怎样?每天搬家吗?”
她重申,从年轻至今,租屋课题一直都没有解决过,也令她对政府给予的承诺表示怀疑,甚至否定了自己的决定决定离开被虐的家庭一事。
Chanel的帖文获得552个反应,以及1600人转发,网友们纷纷对她的遭遇表示同情,并呼吁相关当局能够采取行动给予帮助。
建屋局视情况提供协助
根据建屋局官网显示,在租赁政府组屋方面设有薪金限额,即收入不超过1500元者可优先申请;而薪金已经超过者,则会视情况斟酌,会先考量申请者是否有其他的选项。
当局表示,已采取措施依据单身父母的状况提供协助,包括让他们可向当局提交租赁组屋申请,将申请顺畅化等措施。“我们意识到每户家庭都有不同的需求和情况,因此我们会根据具体情况灵活应对,以便协助相关家庭,满足其特定的住房需求。”
国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲在去年的国会中也表示,政府已在放宽公共住房政策,并且不会因为年轻未婚家长的身份,而拒绝他们的购买或租屋申请。
孙雪玲表示,每个申请者或许都有各自的特殊情况,因此当局会深入了解能够提供的援助,并且将整合和改善沟通手法,避免造成未婚家长额外的焦虑。
建屋局也表示会对35岁以下未婚家长的二房式灵活组屋购房申请计划进行研究,探讨可以提供协助的部分,包括设立专门栏目,帮助回应未婚家长申请组屋时碰倒的常见问题。
Current Affairs
Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.
SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.
This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.
Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.
He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.
These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.
Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.
The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.
CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.
Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.
He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.
Current Affairs
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
Dr Chee Soon Juan of the SDP raised concerns about the S$88 million sale of Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow at Astrid Hill, questioning transparency and the lack of mainstream media coverage. He called for clarity on the buyer, valuation, and potential conflicts of interest.
On Sunday (22 Sep), Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), issued a public statement on Facebook, expressing concerns regarding the sale of Minister for Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam’s Good Class Bungalow (GCB) at Astrid Hill.
Dr Chee questioned the transparency of the S$88 million transaction and the absence of mainstream media coverage despite widespread discussion online.
According to multiple reports cited by Dr Chee, Mr Shanmugam’s property was transferred in August 2023 to UBS Trustees (Singapore) Pte Ltd, which holds the property in trust under the Jasmine Villa Settlement.
Dr Chee’s statement focused on two primary concerns: the lack of response from Mr Shanmugam regarding the transaction and the silence of major media outlets, including Singapore Press Holdings and Mediacorp.
He argued that, given the ongoing public discourse and the relevance of property prices in Singapore, the sale of a high-value asset by a public official warranted further scrutiny.
In his Facebook post, Dr Chee posed several questions directed at Mr Shanmugam and the government:
- Who purchased the property, and is the buyer a Singaporean citizen?
- Who owns Jasmine Villa Settlement?
- Were former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong informed of the transaction, and what were their responses?
- How was it ensured that the funds were not linked to money laundering?
- How was the property’s valuation determined, and by whom?
The Astrid Hill property, originally purchased by Mr Shanmugam in 2003 for S$7.95 million, saw a significant increase in value, aligning with the high-end status of District 10, where it is located. The 3,170.7 square-meter property was sold for S$88 million in August 2023.
Dr Chee highlighted that, despite Mr Shanmugam’s detailed responses regarding the Ridout Road property, no such transparency had been offered in relation to the Astrid Hill sale.
He argued that the lack of mainstream media coverage was particularly concerning, as public interest in the sale is high. Dr Chee emphasized that property prices and housing affordability are critical issues in Singapore, and transparency from public officials is essential to maintain trust.
Dr Chee emphasized that the Ministerial Code of Conduct unambiguously states: “A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest between his office and his private financial interests.”
He concluded his statement by reiterating the need for Mr Shanmugam to address the questions raised, as the matter involves not only the Minister himself but also the integrity of the government and its responsibility to the public.
The supposed sale of Mr Shamugam’s Astrid Hill property took place just a month after Mr Shanmugam spoke in Parliament over his rental of a state-owned bungalow at Ridout Road via a ministerial statement addressing potential conflicts of interest.
At that time, Mr Shanmugam explained that his decision to sell his home was due to concerns about over-investment in a single asset, noting that his financial planning prompted him to sell the property and move into rental accommodation.
Mr Shanmugam is said to have recused himself from the decision-making process, and a subsequent investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) found no wrongdoing while Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean confirmed in Parliament that Mr Shanmugam had removed himself from any decisions involving the property.
As of now, Mr Shanmugam has not commented publicly on the sale of his Astrid Hill property.
-
Comments1 week ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments3 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Leaders of Japanese syndicate accused of laundering S$628.7M lived in Singapore
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore1 week ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore5 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore5 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home