Unidentified business people cross road in downtown Singapore. (Image by TK Kurikawa / Shutterstock.com)

The majority (81%) of Singaporeans are afraid of coronavirus infection, but one third (35%) said they would still attend an important event regardless if they had developed mild symptoms earlier that day, according to a recent survey from The Straits Times.

Following the Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) level was raised from yellow to orange on 7 February, The Straits Times partnered with market research company Nexus Link to conduct the survey, in hopes to better understand the public’s perception of and response to the virus outbreak.

The door-to-door survey was conducted with 401 households that represented Singapore’s various residence types, age groups, ethnicity, and gender. It was carried out for three days, started from 8 February.

When it comes to the authorities’ advice for the sick individuals to stay at home, 34.9 per cent of respondents said they would attend an important event regardless if they had developed symptoms like a sore throat or a slight cough in the morning, the survey revealed.

Of those 34.9 per cent respondents, most (62.5%) of them are aged between 15 to 29 years old, while other respondents are aged 30 to 49 (35.2%) and aged 50 and above (27.1%).

Nexus Link’s chief methodologist Dr Jack Loo said the focus should be on the younger group which seems to be oblivious to the perils of the virus infection.

According to the survey findings, the two groups – 30 to 49 years old (58%); and 50 years old and above (50.8%) groups – were more likely to stay indoors amid the outbreak, compared to those aged 15 to 29 years old which only 31.3 per cent said they were doing so.

The survey also found that women (85.9%) were more worried about getting infected with the virus compared to men (75.5%).

In fact, women were more likely to have stockpiled medical supplies and groceries, and wear masks outdoors despite not being sick, while men were more likely to feel they were prepared for the outbreak.

Meanwhile, more than half (68.6%) of the respondents said they would avoid areas that a confirmed case had visited, while less than half (31.2%) would advise others on public transport to wear a mask or seek medical help if they appeared to look sick.

“Those married with children under the age of 13 were the most likely to do this, with 41.6 per cent saying they would encourage such social responsibility,” the survey revealed. “Only 32.9 per cent of singles, and 22.6 per cent of those married with no pre-teen children, said they would do the same.”

In terms of sources of information, most of the respondents found out about the outbreak from television (69.8%), social media (66.1%) and messaging application (59.9%). Some gained information about the outbreak from the newspapers (49.1%) and the Health Ministry’s website (43.1%).

When asked if they were confident with the Government’s ability to tackle the virus outbreak situation, most (80.8%) of the respondents said they were confident.

“The high level of transparency exemplified by the Government over the past few weeks has also translated to higher levels of trust in the Government,” said Dr Loo.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP conducts first walkabout for 2015

The Singapore Democratic Party had a head-start to the next general elections…

林鼎抨击唯才是举制 避谈群众功劳夸耀自身才干

新加坡人民之声党领袖林鼎,录制视频浅谈新加坡的“唯才是举”现象,批评一些政治和商界领袖出现沾沾自喜的傲慢态度,避谈携手创造成就的群众,反而谎称正是他们的才能和“精明决策”,自己才值得拥有优渥收入。 林鼎先是分享“唯才是举”一说的起源。1958年,英国社会和工党政治家麦可杨(Michael Young),在他的一本讽刺小说《唯才是举的崛起》,发明了“Meritocracy”这个词汇。 他在这本小说描绘一个想象中的未来英国,这个社会把智力和才干价值奉为中心原则,把社会阶层分为精英阶层和缺乏才干的阶层,出现严重不平等。 麦可杨深知唯才是举制度的危害,在2001年,他在英国《卫报》一篇抨击英国首相布莱尔的文章,毫不留情地抨击唯才是举制度: “这些精英相信、当然他们也一再被鼓吹,他们凭藉自己的实力才干取得成就。他们会认为自己值得拥有这一切,不免感到沾沾自喜,相比下,他人可能知道他们的成就,只不过是受益于裙带关系、他们是某某人的子女,而不是因为他们的才干。 精英新贵甚至迷信自身权位的道德正当性(全凭自己的努力和成绩),因而更加肆无忌惮地捞取好处,忘却并背叛了原有的出身,导致下层阶级失去民意代言人,逐渐在民主进程中失声,最终产生政治疏离感。” 林鼎揶揄行动党对于如何引领国家继续发展,已“黔驴技穷”。他分析,唯才是举的弊端之一,在于只有一部分的才干价值、精英才会被提拔,而且需符合建制阶层的心意。 “而个人才能乃是基于打分制评估,反而对那些掌握优势的孩子更有利。” 此外,麦可杨也批评社会上流阶层无可避免地会表现得沾沾自喜和傲慢,认为他们享有的荣华富贵是应得的;至于对于那些较不幸群体,他们只是耸耸肩,认为每个人都得到他们应得的。 “麦可杨也批评,就因为维护特定阶层的体制、让底下阶层生而贫穷,这是不公平的。” 林鼎转而指责,现如今许多政治和商界领袖也展现这种沾沾自喜的态度,他们避谈今日他们的成就,乃是因为共同打造这个国家的群众携手创造的,反之谎称他们的收入,是基于自己的才干和“精明决策”争取而来。…

抗议柔大臣登船事件 我国展延新马JMCIM部长级会议

为抗议柔佛大臣奥斯曼沙比安登上停泊与大士争议水域的马国浮标船,我国展延了原本在今天举行的新马依斯干达特区部长级联合委员会(JMCIM)会议。 奥斯曼于上周三(9日)登上马国浮标船MV PEDOMAN慰问船员。对此我国外交部在11日向马国发出照会,不满奥斯曼巡视我国领海,且未经批准,就登上“非法停留”我国水域的浮标船。 外交部指出上述行为乃挑衅举动,有违两国早前达成的协议精神,也形成了不宜举行JMCIM的气氛,因此展演会议。 不过,有关抗议并未影响马国经济部长阿兹敏于昨日到访,拜会我国外长维文和国家发展部长暨财政部第二部长黄循财,针对双边关系继续会谈。 阿兹敏在脸书也对会谈努力表示积极,分享道:与维文的会谈具建设性,继续为双边课题作出努力。维护稳健的关系纽带更符合新马双边利益。 柔大臣:了解海事人员执勤情况 另一方面,柔大臣奥斯曼则坚称自己并非入侵我国水域,只是出海亲身了解海事局人员执勤情况,不认为本身出海巡视应成为一项课题。 他也认为挑起他登船的课题只是借口,因为新加坡政府需要“新的方案来解决近期的新马海域争议和领空议题。” 他是在前往在马国士姑来出席一项活动,在记者会上这么表示。 他也强调,他其实每两週都会为在船上执勤的工作人员送上日常用品及粮食。他认为,这样的做法无需向新加坡交代。 他也指出,随行警官清楚知道两国水域界限,他并未入侵新加坡水域,没有刻意挑衅。…