On Thursday (13 Feb), the Straits Times had published an article, ““Fighting coronavirus: An appeal to Singaporeans” written by professor and international diplomat, Tommy Koh Thong, who is also Singapore’s former Permanent Representative to the United Nations.

Prof Koh’s article which was a premium story, was a reminder to everyone how Singapore stood through the test of time and emerged victorious in the face of all other major crises before, and reminder to the country that by being united and focused, it can overcome the COVID-19 pandemic.

“These were World War II, the expulsion from Malaysia and SARS. We survived those crises. We showed the world that Singaporeans are a tough and resilient people. When faced with adversity, we remained united, courageous and caring. We can do so again.” wrote Prof Koh in his Facebook post about his article.

The professor recounts a difficult period during World War II, where food was scarce and times were hard. He explains that despite the tyrannical Japanese occupation in Singapore, citizens from diverse ethnicities and cultures lived together in harmony. He had also highlighted the level of trust that existed within the community, as they never had to worry of keeping their doors locked.

The article then proceeds to address Singapore’s expulsion from Malaysia in August, 1965. Following the separation between both countries, Singapore faced a shortage of housing in which the British deemed as an “insoluble” problem.

As Singapore’s economy suffered, the rate of unemployment soared. To make matters worse, tuberculosis, a contagious infection, was also becoming an epidemic in the country.

The Professor highlights that despite these temporary setbacks, Singaporeans did not seek financial assistance from others. Instead, Singaporeans stood together in solidarity as they overcame the obstacles thrown at them.

Prof Koh writes that, “The progress of Singapore, during the past 54 years, has been nothing short of a miracle.”

“The miracle is, however, human-made and not heaven-made.”

What Singapore had were honest political leaders, excellent public service, and hardworking people, who Prof Koh credited for having “devotion to education and adaptability”.

Prof Koh also pointed out about the turbulent period back in 2003, whereby Singaporeans were at war with the deadly respiratory disease, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).

The SARS outbreak began with three Singaporean women, who after being infected in Hong Kong, were admitted to Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH). Despite one of them having recovered from the fatal disease, her family members did not.

Prof Koh identifies two key factors that led to Singapore’s victory over SARS. They were due to the roles of concerned civilians as well as heroic efforts exercised by medical professionals.

In 2003, Dr. David Heymann, Executive Director for Communicable Diseases at WHO, commended the Ministry of Health (MOH) for Singapore’s excellent collaboration efforts in handling the SARS outbreak which was regarded as “exemplary”.

Prof Koh reiterates that Singapore has been historically proven to be able to withstand the major crises that have taken place over the course of time. He urges Singaporeans to remain strong and united whilst caring for one another.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工党党魁罕见受邀国大毕业礼 毕业生:展示新加坡民主成熟度

工人党秘书长毕丹星,于昨日(19日)首要出席新加坡国立大学第22长毕业典礼,并致词分享学习历程。这也是本地反对党领袖少有的机会,受邀出席国立大学毕业礼活动。 国大是毕丹星的母校,他是在2000年从这里毕业。他坦言,自己不是全A状元,也是在教育体系下力争上游,努力克服各种障碍。 “我小学毕业考考得不太好,进入普通源流中学,上初级学院和大学也是一路跌跌撞撞。“他在1999年获得海峡汽船奖学金,能被国大文学暨社会科学院录取,就读政治与历史系,感觉像中了彩票一样。 也是阿裕尼集选区国会议员的毕丹星,勉励现场470名文学暨社科院毕业生,即便曾经学习有不理想的时候,但是也不要轻言放弃。 他说,他在国大和服役的经验,改变了自己对学习的态度,“当中也许你们在经历了国大的求学生涯后,会感觉过去你们应该更加努力。” 毕丹星补充,踏出校门,就不能只依靠一纸文凭,还有个人态度,职业道德和勤勉在职场也很重要。他劝勉表现好点莫要因文凭尔兹曼,反之要精益求精,追求卓越。 “当你往上爬时,记得善待他人,因为有天你往下走,可能也会遇到他们。“毕丹星的待人哲理,赢得台下掌声。 32岁的政治科学毕业生代表瓦利德,在致词时不忘赞许今年的毕业礼较不同,因为反对党领袖获得邀请,显示民主政治发展趋向成熟。 同时出席毕业礼的嘉宾,尚包括卫生、环境与水源高级政务部长许连碹博士和人民行动党丹绒巴葛集选区国会议员谢世儒。

余振忠:一根手指指责别人 三指指向自己

“新加坡政治分析员暨香港教育大学助理教授胡君杰认为,上周二的国会动议表明,大部分议员和他们所代表的公民,都表达对阿裕尼-后港市镇会当前安排的不满。” 英语媒体《今日报》在本月7日发表一篇专题报导,采访学者分析上周二副总理王瑞杰,在国会对工人党议员提出“诚信动议”的影响。 不过前非选区议员余振忠不认同胡君杰的观点,后者的说法似乎意指,赞同动议的行动党议员,就反映了大部分国人的观点。 对此余振忠反问,议员受委托管理选区,难道就一定能代表居民的意见?他直言,本地的选举仍首先考量政党(品牌、宣言、过往政绩乃至他们他们如何运用恐惧和媒体),之后才是候选人对选区的承诺。 “无论如何,阿裕尼和后港的居民在来届大选才有最终的话事权。” 余振忠在上周五在脸书发表长文,点评对国会诚信动议的看法。他直言当副总理和其他行动党部长、议员在国会上演的“大龙凤”,不要忘了:当你一只食指指责别人,有三根手指头正好指向自己。 他列举了行动党政府的一些财务事务: 总审计署对人协财务提”否定意见“ 其一,向总理公署报告的人民协会,每年处理约10亿元的预算,当他们被总审计署提出”否定意见“(adverse opinion)时,理应能立即改善。 但在2015年,在91个民众俱乐部管理委员会(CCMC)中,有35个被发现未经相关单位的批准下,签下了53份总值1778万元的租赁合同。 林瑞生:出于好意…

MOH should keep eye on immigration-related health issues

The following is a letter to the Today newspaper which was rejected…

研究指政府应考量国人对移民比率的接受度

李光耀公共政策学院新加坡政策研究所和种族和谐资源中心(OnePeople.sg),從去年8月至今年1月进行一项民调,探讨可能影响本地社会凝聚力的隐忧。 根据李光耀公共政策学院官网,发布有关研究报告的简介,指出近期发生的一些社会事件,都与五大关键议题有关:族群、宗教、移民、阶级和性少数权益(LGBT)。 “仅在今年,“美丽求求你”讽刺视频风波、立法禁止外国传教士发表煽动性言论、再到上周末出现摩根大通高管辱骂本地保安,引起社会反弹,”以及有要求废除刑事法典377A的呼声,都一再占据着本地媒体的版位。 故此,该研究旨在探讨本地居民如何受到上述五大隐忧影响,以及国家干预与公共论述的缓解机制。 研究认为国人都意识到管理社会隐忧的重要,尽管过去族群和宗教议题都由政府管理,惟相当大部分人口亦认为移民课题、LGBT和阶级需要政府的参与与公共讨论。 研究建议政府在制定移民政策时应考量国人对移民比率的接受度,特别是有六成受访者坦言,不喜欢和新移民做邻居,住家附近的新移民人口在1-20巴仙之间,对他们来说才是比较理想的。 近七成认为移民仍不够融入本土社会 此外,有将近67.5巴仙受访者,某种程度上赞同或非常赞同,新移民对于融入本土社会仍做得不够好;不过93巴仙受访者赞同孩子与不同背景的人一起玩耍。 而来自不同学历、不同年龄背景的受访者中,有近半认为在移民课题上认为政府应干预和管制移民涌入,这可能显示本地人的排外心理和对就业的不安全感在提升。 报告也提到近期发生的摩根大通高管辱骂保安事件,而坊间一些声音不外乎要求对这位外籍高官采取行动、调查他的学历背景、开除他/驱逐出境。 报告也分析居民在看待此事上把身份和阶级关联在一起,甚至将之关联到此前新加坡和印度政府签署的《综合性经济合作协议(CECA)》,使之成为当局必须处理的不利因素。此外,包括保安协会、工会和一些议员也站出来呼吁立法保障低薪劳工的权益。