Perspective view of national flags of Southeast asia countries, AEC, ASEAN Economic Community (Photo by OPgrapher from Shutterstock).

Regional lawmakers have today called on authorities in Southeast Asia to stop using broadly worded anti-fake news laws to prosecute those accused of spreading disinformation about the coronavirus health emergency, and instead invest in public messaging campaigns to ensure their citizens are reliably informed about the issue.

In recent weeks, misleading information – so-called “fake news” – has been heavily shared across the region online regarding novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December. There have been more than 1,000 confirmed deaths from the virus – the majority in China – and infections have been reported in dozens of countries, including many in Southeast Asia.

“While it is important for authorities to prevent the spread of disinformation, and ensure accurate information about the coronavirus, across the region we are seeing a worrying trend of ambiguously-worded laws being used to prosecute citizens,” said Teddy Baguilat, a former Philippines parliamentarian, and Board Member of ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR).

“Laws that rely on vague prohibitions, such as punishing so-called ‘fake news’, excessively restrict the right to freedom of expression and should be abolished.” 

In Thailand, authorities have used an “Anti-Fake News Centre” to identify and charge two people under the Computer Crime Act for sharing false information about the virus, and the pair each face a potential five-year jail term. A Malaysian journalist could also be given a similar sentence, after she was accused of causing “public mischief” under the country’s Penal Code for a series of social media posts on the issue. Despite calls for the reporter’s release from civil society groups, Malaysian officials have hardened their stance, and said they will speed up cases if more people are found guilty of breaking the law.

Meanwhile, in Indonesia two people have been arrested and face a potential five-year jail term for allegedly spreading disinformation, and Vietnam has issued a decree that allows for heavy fines for those found guilty of sharing fake news.

“It’s absurd, and wholly disproportionate, that people are facing a potential five-year jail term just for sharing false information online,” said Teddy Baguilat.

 “And think about the chilling impact such measures have on freedom of expression. Keep this up, and people will be too scared to share their opinion about anything.” 

Chinese officials have been accused of censoring criticism of the government’s handling of the coronavirus, including by shutting down social media accounts used by citizens to share information, which experts say could have contributed to the illness spreading as quickly as it has, and contributed to the spread of disinformation.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Activist and opposition party member files police report for harassment

Osman Sulaiman, activist and member of opposition party, National Solidarity Party has…

ST says medical chief rebutted doctors’ mask advice when he merely said “not the most important thing”

The Straits Times (ST) published a news article on its print edition…

《海时》记者驳李美花“阿公论”:家长作风是危险自满心态

《海峡时报》一名记者撰文,反驳义顺集选区议员李美花的“阿公论”,也强调当权者的家长式作风,是一种危险的自满态度。 通常国会里很难听到方言福建话,但是当李美花提到“死鬼仔”,形容忘恩负义的儿孙,立刻引起新加坡人民的注意,更令人质疑,难道不赞成政府或彼此意见相左,就是忘恩了? 《阿公与阿成》的故事,似乎就在影射新加坡居民,指新加坡居民经常询问政府为什么没有在最近公布的财政预算案中,为人民提供更多经济支持,尤其是在保健医疗等领域。 《海时》记者Tee Zhou于本月24日撰文评论,李美花透过故事,赞叹和感谢政府精打细算管理国家财政,取得61亿新元的盈利并提供独立一代配套。她也质问”别人的阿公有这么好吗“? Tee Zhou在文中写到, “我很高兴独立一代,即出生在50年代的人们,在今年的财政预算案中获得关注。但我不赞同李美花,把政府的描述成被误会的阿公” 。 虽然李美花以这个在议会中的故事而闻名,但并非所有民众都接受有关言论。 “阿公论”引来瞩目 上月初,李美花“谈蛇又说鼠”的片段广为流传。她表示,这是养猫志愿者留下食物太久,且无人看管,导致她所在地区的蛇和老鼠问题加剧。然而,这是她的选民所面临的问题,是她作为国会议员的工作之一。…

Great Eastern pledges S$1 million support package to help customers who are affected by COVID-19

Last Friday (14 Feb), leading insurer Great Eastern announced that it is…