Source: CNA / YouTube

The four surgical masks being distributed for free by the Government are not meant to be used immediately upon collection, but for people who are unwell to use them before getting new masks at the clinic or hospital, said Senior Minister of State Janil Puthucheary.

Dr Janil in an interview with CNA on 30 Jan said that those who are well do not need to use the mask and “worry” about getting a mask.

“The purpose of these masks is that if you are sick and then need to go see a doctor, you have a mask to take with you on your journey there.

“When you go to see the doctor at the polyclinic or the hospital, you’ll be given another mask and as many masks as you need,” said Dr Janil.

“You don’t need to go and join these long queues to stock up on masks just in case. We’re putting a mask in your hand. If you’re sick and you need it, it’s there,” he said.

Part of the 1.3 million households across Singapore began receiving four surgical masks per household from the Government on Sat (1 Feb).

The masks will be distributed via 89 community centres (CC) and 654 residents’ committee (RC) centres until Sun (9 Feb).

Residents of Housing Development Board (HDB) flats may check their nearest designated RC centre on Maskgowhere.sg.

The masks can only be collected once per household and those collecting will have to bring along their identity card (NRIC).

For vulnerable segments of the population and residents with mobility issues who may be unable to collect them at the designated points, the government said that the masks will be delivered to said residents instead.

WATCH: Senior Minister of State Janil Puthucheary speaks to CNA on why each Singapore household is getting 4 surgical masks

Noting that the Government — particularly economic agencies — has been working on clamping down profiteering among unscrupulous parties especially on online marketplaces, Dr Janil said that the real aim of handing our four masks per household is to “reduce the anxiety that drives people to go and stock up on hundreds of boxes just in case”.

“The message that we want to send is: The mask that you need — just in case — we’re putting it in your hands,” he reiterated.

When asked as to how the Government could ensure that the distribution of free masks will be equitable for each household, Dr Janil said: “Right now, the masks that are being provided to retailers … They’re not being distributed equally to all Singaporeans”.

This is due to the act of bulk buying by the same people who are willing to brave long queues over and over again, he said.

The Government’s free mask handout exercise, on the other hand, ensures that the masks are “distributed throughout the country — in every estate, in every division, in every town”, said Dr Janil.

While the Government is taking measures to to restrict Singaporeans’ travel to Wuhan and the surrounding Hubei Province, practicing personal hygiene such as washing hands is a crucial and helpful precautionary measure on a domestic level.

“Within Singapore, washing our hands, practicing personal hygiene and getting on with all the other things we have to do is important,” he said.

Touching on claims circulating online regarding frontline Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) officers being instructed not to wear face masks, Dr Janil said that frontline officers responsible for health checks such as thermal screening were all wearing masks, based on findings from his inspection at the Tuas and Woodlands Checkpoints.

Their situation, he added, is “different from the rest of us who are well” due to the high risk of exposure to the virus when carrying out their work.

“We want them to carry out their duty whether someone is not cooperative or coughing or are at risk … and that mask helps them do that,” said Dr Janil.

Frontline ICA officers could wear masks if they need to: Home Affairs Minister

Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Sat (1 Feb) similarly denied allegations that frontline Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) officers had been instructed not to wear face masks while on duty.

Mr Shanmugam told reporters on a visit to Woodlands Checkpoint on Sat that ICA officers working at Customs and customer service counters the immigration checkpoints have been given the same protocols as other frontline officers from other government departments.

“I think there has been a misunderstanding. If you are not well, then you shouldn’t even be there,” he said, noting that officers on duty could wear face masks if they felt the need to do so.

Mr Shanmugam said that practicing good personal hygiene is more crucial, as there is a high risk of being infected with the virus through touching contaminated surfaces.

“The riskiest part of the body right now is your hands, many of us touch things and bring it to our face, that’s the possibility of the virus going in,” he said.

Frontline immigration officers allegedly “not allowed” to wear face masks while on duty, online users claim

Claims regarding frontline staff at immigration checkpoints not being permitted to wear face masks while on duty circulated online late last month.

Such claims suggested that the frontline immigration officers were not instructed to wear masks while screening visitors over at the counters to portray a positive image to visitors entering the country, particularly in the midst of rising xenophobic sentiments — Sinophobic in particular — against visitors from mainland China following the outbreak.

In neighbouring countries such as Malaysia and Thailand, all frontline immigration officers are instructed to wear face masks.

The Thaiger reported at the end of last month that immigration officers in Thailand at all airports nationwide are required to wear masks and gloves “as they must handle many passports and frequently converse with passengers”.

Earlier on 28 Jan, TOC sent a query to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) regarding why frontline officers — barring those tasked to do health checks — at the immigration checkpoints did not put on face masks, as seen below.

However, we did not receive any reply from MHA regarding the claims.

MHA on 31 Jan, however, told Mothership that frontline ICA officers are not required to wear surgical masks because “the risk of infection from such transient contact is assessed to be low”.

“The health authorities generally define the level of close contact that is necessary for virus transmission as an exposure of at least 30 minutes within two metres of an infected person,” MHA added.

However, the Ministry added that officers who are unwell and have a fever, cough or runny nose should put on a surgical mask, and seek medical attention promptly.

“ICA officers who are assigned to perform clearance duties on travellers with respiratory symptoms (e.g. fever, cough, shortness of breath) will don surgical masks and disposable gloves,” the Ministry added.

Health experts in Singapore earlier told The Straits Times that there is no need for healthy people to wear the masks, as currently there is no community spread of the Wuhan virus in Singapore.

In the same vein, Gov.sg also reminded the public on Sat that the masks “are for those who are sick”, and that people who are in healthy condition do not need to wear a mask.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

亲睹日环食奇观 多人午时外出“看太阳”

阔别了21年再现的日环食天文奇观,吸引人们关注,多名业者趁着用餐时间离开办公室,到屋外“看”太阳。 日环食于今天(26日)中午11时许,将近12时开始,在中午1时就看到有不少民众走上大街,开始查看日环食的景象。 有的民众甚至为了能够取得“最佳景观”,在大路中间的路墩抬头观看。 有者则在家中设置好观看奇景的望远镜,以便能够亲眼目睹。 社交媒体和手机交流应用程序也不断有日环食的照片及视频流传开来,让其他被困在办公室内、或受天气影响无法看到此自然奇景的民众,也能一饱眼福。 甚至有网民用日环食搞怪,P图成为包公额头的白月亮、CPF(中央公积金局缩写)等。 日环食是指当太阳、月球和地球排成一直线时,月球会阻挡了太阳的光照射到地球的层面,人们抬头看就好似“太阳被吃掉了”一般,慢慢形成一个好似金戒指般的圆环。 除了我国,在马来西亚的柔佛州和砂拉越州也能够看得到日环食此奇景。

丹绒巴葛安检站查获四把仿真枪 已交由警方侦办

丹绒巴葛安检站发现可疑货柜箱,并查获四把仿真枪。 移民与关卡局昨日(9日)在脸书上发表文告,当局于上周日(6日)对一个货柜箱进行扫描时,发现该货柜箱非常可疑。 据文告指出,该货柜箱申报为玩具和家用品,但因事有蹊跷,执法人员到进口商的场地进行拆柜,结果发现四把仿真枪和配件。 目前案件已转交警方侦办。 移民与关卡局重申,边境防卫我国安全的第一防线,类似的隐藏方式将可能被恐怖分子用于走私武器和爆炸物,并可能对新加坡展开袭击。 当局会继续在关卡进行安检,避免任何人企图偷渡或是走私毒品、武器、爆炸物或其他违禁品。

Local wedding called out for wearing Native American headdress for wedding; netizens say ignorance is no excuse

In this increasingly global society we live in, being socially conscious is…

马国首相:若人民认为有需要,或探讨重新落实消费税

马来西亚自去年国阵政府败选后,新政府上任随即宣布取消消费税,以销售与服务税(SST)取代。但近日,政府却表示,若人民认为有需要,或探讨重启消费税(GST)。 首相敦马今日出席内政部安全与公共秩序推介礼,有记者提出马国经济研究院(MIER) 曾指应该重启消费税,并将税率调整至3巴仙,敦马针对此事作出回应。 “如果这是公众需求,我们会探讨会对此进行研究”,他表示。但敦马也表明,该项目不会列入2020年的财政预算案。 据悉,销售及服务税(SST)是只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者,但消费税的征税对象几乎涵盖所有人,只要有消费就必须缴税。换言之,从生产商、批发商、零售商、进出口商到最终的消费者,每个层面都必须缴税。但销售及服务税只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者。 但SST落实后,许多人仍投诉物价并因此下降,因此民怨四起。日前,《诗华日报》报导,大马经济研究院(MIER)也呼吁政府在2020年财政预算案中,以3%的较低税率,重新落实物品及消费税(GST)。经济智囊机构主席丹斯里卡玛沙烈(Tan Sri Kamal Salih)形容消费税反而更显公平,而且该系统也在2015年原油价格下跌至每桶36美元时,平衡了政府的收入来源。 对此,马国消费人联合会(FOMCA)则表示,消费税已给予众人许多负面形象,例如以往6巴仙税率,特别是在必需品上,已经给人民带来很重的负担,故若要重启恐怕不易实行。