Photo: risingnepaldaily.com

In this year’s annual ranking of countries based on corruption level, Singapore has been ranked as the fourth country that has the least corruption in the public sector. The country’s score ties with Sweden and Switzerland for the second consecutive year.

The three nations kept their score of 85 on the corruption watchdog Transparency International’s 2019 Corruption Perception Index. The index uses a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).

Singapore has been the only country in Asia to make it to the top 10 cleanest countries.

In the report, released on Thursday (23 Jan), the consistently clean New Zealand and Denmark tied for the top ranking with indices of 87 points.

In 2018, Finland’s score tied with that of Switzerland, Singapore and Sweden but this year, it managed to secure the third ranking at 86 points, one point ahead.

The report also highlighted there was little to no improvements in combating corruption in a “staggering” number of countries. This is despite the rising tide of anti-graft movements worldwide.

In 2019, the average score was 43, and two-thirds of the 180 nations scored below 50, similar to the previous year.

Since 2012, the scores of 21 nations dropped markedly whereas only 22 nations, such as Estonia, Greece and Guyana have increased their scores.

Canada, a consistent high scorer, lost four points from the previous year to now at 77. According to Transparency International, a former executive of construction company SNC-Lavalin was convicted for bribe activities in Libya in December last year, which is also linked to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

As for the US, it scored the lowest in eight years at 69 points. Transparency International reported that government trust in the US is at a record low at 17 per cent, as found by Pew Research Centre. Other reasons also include the increasing influence of special interests in government and threats to the US system of checks and balances which affected the country’s score last year.

Since its inception in 1995, the Corruption Perception Index has ranked 180 territories and countries by the perceived levels of public sector corruption as perceived by business people and experts. Incorporating expert assessments and 13 surveys, a score is derived for each country.

In last year’s index, Norway was ranked seventh at 84, followed by the Netherlands at 82, Germany and Luxembourg at 80.

“While Singapore has done relatively well in the fight against corruption, as attested to by several international surveys, we must not allow this to lull us into a sense of complacency…In fact, we must work even harder to ensure that incorruptibility remains part of the DNA of every Singaporean,” the director of Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), Denis Tang remarked.

Singapore has always had a good track record as a low corruption country, as evidenced by the ranking by Political and Economic Risk Consultancy‘s 2019 Report on Corruption in Asia of the country as the least corrupt country in the region since 1995.

“Even though we have slipped a place from third to fourth, this is not a significant decline,” Lawyer Wilson Ang, the head of Asia regulatory compliance and investigations practice in global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, remarked.

Mr Ang believed that “what is more important is that Singapore should continue to keep pace with global developments and update our laws to address the corruption risks in doing business.”

Regional nations that ranked lower on the index, such as Thailand, Malaysia and India are on the path of reforming their laws on compliance practices and corporate liability to better match mature jurisdictions such as the UK and the US.

With this, corruption can be proven more easily not only at the individual level, but also the company level.

“I think Singapore ought to review our laws and implement a more consistent and workable test for corporate criminal liability and also to give credit and a legal defence to companies which have, in good faith, implemented anti-corruption compliance programmes,” Mr Ang concluded.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

不曾与外籍人士竞争过工作 “纸将军”有资格谈不公雇佣现象?

犹记得今年初,工人党党魁毕丹星在国会询问,从2015至2018年,新加坡公民和永久居民就业率的对比。他也提及通常政府把“本地人”都涵括公民和永久居民。 对此,贸工部长陈振声直言:“我可以给你数据,但这么问背后意义又是什么?” 如今他应该知道其意义所在,有关不公平雇佣现象,和外国人在部分企业中占据优势的争议愈发增加,甚至连全国职工总会的秘书长黄志明也已警觉而现身表态,指政府需要缩紧就业准证(Employment Pass)政策。 讽刺的是,陈振声和黄志明都不曾与任何外国人竞争过任何工作,他们在军旅稳健建功勋,但他们是否能够感同身受,经历新加坡劳工的担忧和恐惧,而且这些焦虑长期笼罩着工友们的生活? 陈振声也在表示,必须为新加坡疫情后的发展规划新的方向。但除了帮助企业适应以外,我们也必须直面体制的问题,包括是否还要继续委派前将领们,打理国家经济?这么做仍凑效,或已不合时宜? 是什么让前将领自居国家领导职务? 为何部队俨然成了未来国家高级领导的重大培育平台?这是需要重新思考并彻底进行改革。 不少人民行动党的成员都有军旅背景,其中包括政务部长陈国明和严晓芳,还有精英阶层的高级政治官员,均未面对过与外籍人士的就业竞争。 除了内阁以外,数十年来,这些将领们一直渗透到人民的生活中,包括人民协会、全国职工总会、行政机构甚至是淡马锡控股等相关组织。 其中一个典型的例子即为前将军伍逸松,在他从部队退役后,加入淡马锡控股,随后还成为东方海皇(Neptune Orient…

泰王:违宪反传统 公主角逐首相职或受阻

泰国国王哇集拉隆功(Maha Vajiralongkorn)指乌汶叻公主(Princess Ubolratana)参选首相之举“不恰当”且违宪、违反皇室传统。 在泰公主於2月8日早上宣布竞选首相职位后,泰王发出皇室声明,指公主的候选资格违反了宪法和皇室传统,所有皇室成员都不适合参政。 根据彭博新闻网指出,泰国国王表示, “泰国君主制是将凝聚民心的中心点。君王和皇室成员地位应该超越政治。” 这显示了高级皇室成员之间存在着前所未有的分歧,或加剧东南亚第二大经济体的政治紧张局势。 泰爱国党暂不做回应 对此,泰国爱国党表示暂时不作回应。 身为影星的乌汶叻公主,在其拥有10万追随者的社媒Instagram帐号感谢泰国人民的支持,“我很高兴有机会为国家带来光荣。”她日前也在该账号指出已放弃了王室头衔,会像平民一样生活。“我接受泰爱国党提名我竞选首相,以显示在宪法下我的权利和自由并没有任何特权是高于其他泰国公民的。” 67岁的乌汶叻公主是泰王哇集拉隆功的大姐。早前她宣布将代表泰爱国党,和泰国现任首相巴育在来临的泰国大选一较高低。 带给巴育助力…

Red Dot United unveils mission statement and logo, announces plans to contest Jurong GRC

In a statement on Friday (19 June), Red Dot United (RDU), Singapore’s…

Anton Casey's employer "investigating" his comments

The employer of Mr Anton Casey, whose Facebook postings have caused outrage…