On Tuesday (21 January), the Marsiling-Yew Tee Town Council elucidated that it did not make a police report to arrest a single mother for unpaid service and conservancy charges (S&CC) amounting to S$2,150.

It explained that the woman was actually apprehended after she failed to turn up for a mandated court hearing. This resulted in a warrant of arrest issued to her after being instructed by the Court, the town council said in a Facebook post.

The town council posted this clarification in connection with a recent Facebook post by activist Gilbert Goh on Sunday. Mr Goh stated he was “shocked” to know that the single mother with a 16-year-old son was arrested and held in police lock-up for close to 10 hours before being released.

Mr Goh pointed out that the single mother works as a promoter with a monthly salary of about S$1,000. She told him she couldn’t pay the S$159 monthly instalment and every time she lapsed, the town council sent in a legal reminder which costs S$200, further aggravating her S&CC default.

Mr Goh described it as “akin to paying a loan shark but this time it’s a legalised one”.

In the town council’s latest post, it stated that the woman living in a 5-room flat, has arrears in S&CC for many years before 2016. “Despite attempts at engaging the resident, the Town Council unfortunately had to undertake legal recourse”.

The town council explained that prior to taking legal action against the woman, it had sent out 6 notifications to the residents, and even visited her house twice.

“In this case, the Town Council sent out a total of 6 notifications by post between December 2016 and October 2017 and conducted house visits in August 2016 and November 2017 in our attempt to reach out to the resident,” it said.

After constant engagement with the resident, she made partial payment from the outstanding bills, and agreed on an instalment plan on 19 December 2017. “The Town Council immediately withdrew the court proceedings and updated the Warrant Enforcement Unit on the same day,” it noted.

It added that the woman’s latest instalment plan was made in November last year, and it allowed her to “gradually pay off the arrears while keeping up with the current monthly payment”.

It went on to say that it will work with grassroots partners to help her.

Town Councils must negotiate with residents over prolonged unpaid S&CC

As of April 2018, the State Courts placed in measures to direct town councils to negotiate and engage with the residents who owe S&CC before starting criminal proceedings against them as a last resort.

It is required to issue at least two notices to a resident who does not pay S&CC, before issuing a statutory demand.

It has been said that these protocols will give town councils a “consistent system” of managing these issues, and they will help identify residents who have genuine difficulties in paying S&CC or composition amounts. The town councils can then step in to help or adapt the penalty measures to the residents’ circumstances.

All the town councils engaged by the State Courts had indicated that they are agreeable to the imposed initiatives.

An article by TODAY reported that other than going down the legal route, town councils let needy residents pay off the outstanding amount in instalments, or rope them in to do simple part-time work, including looking out for areas that need to be cleaned or checking for defective items in common areas such as lightbulbs that need to be changed.

However, Marine Parade Town Council chairman Lim Biow Chuan was quoted in the same TODAY report, stating that it takes much “time and manpower resources” to serve three reminder letters and to get property managers to visit residents’ homes to better understand the issue.

Adding that while taking residents to court is only done when there is “no choice”, ultimately, the town council still has “an obligation” to collect the charges for a common pooled fund that is used for estate maintenance.

Mr Lim said: “We can’t have people who don’t pay and (we) do nothing… Just like a management corporation, we owe it as a duty to other people who are paying”.

Separately, the Workers’ Party town council said in 2015 that it has taken steps to collect some of the outstanding S&CC charges, but it will only use court action as the last resort.

In an article by The Straits Times in 2015, then-vice-chairman of Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) Png Eng Huat said that the they will only start legal proceedings “as a last resort after some time has elapsed”.

“From the first reminder right up to the legal letter sent to the resident, there are ample time and opportunities for the resident to make payment or negotiate a payment plan with the Town Council,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

破坏地下水管致38户断水逾九小时 承包商遭罚款5.65万元!

根据公用事业局文告,本地一家建筑承包商丰明建筑公司(Feng Ming Construction),因进行未经批准的打桩工程,结果破坏地下水管,导致饮用水源流失,为此该公司被罚款5万6500元。 这也是该公司第二次受罚。 2019年9月,配合武吉知马一带杜尼安路的道路拓宽工程,这家公司进行铁板桩打桩,但却导致地下大水管破裂,结果38户家庭断水约9个半小时。 损失的水源,达到46万8000公升,足足等于奥林匹克游泳池的20巴仙! 经过调查,丰明建筑确实知道该地带有地下水管,却未进行足够勘测,确定水管位置。再者,也没有按要求在进行打桩工程前取得公用事业局批准。 2013年,该公司曾因为破坏芽笼一巷的大水管,而被罚款4万元。

林鼎录视频教战 如何避抵触诽谤法畅所欲言

有鉴于诽谤诉讼产生寒蝉效应,制造恐惧打压民众自由表达意见,“人民之声”党创办人暨律师林鼎,录制教育视频,从法律角度教战民众,如何在避免抵触诽谤法的情况下,为自己、社会和不公平现况发声。 “我捍卫国家的言论自由,然而在这个第一世界国家,却有着最严苛的诽谤法。”他描述,有关诽谤法实则是英殖民时期当权者和富人用来打压异议的工具,却在国家独立后沿用至今。 林鼎在视频中与一个虚拟漫画人物Winston互动,Winston打算在网络宣泄对水费涨价30巴仙的不满,马上遭到林鼎制止,指出随意发表言论可能会让他惹上官非。 他告诉Winston:“这么做不会面对监禁,但你可能收到严厉声明将采取法律行动的律师信。” 不过林鼎安慰Winston,不必为此感到沮丧,仍有很多方法,在不抵触法律的情况下发声。 避免人身攻击、含沙射影 林鼎指出在表达意见前应避免: (一)在没有根据的情况下指控他人,例如指控X先生偷了人民的钱,除非你有办法证明。 同时,不能暗示、影射某人人格和一些声名狼藉人士相似。例如把某人的照片和抢匪放在一起,都可能构成诽谤。 (二)避免指名道姓作人身攻击。“你可以说增税是愚蠢、不公平做法,但避免指控推行政策的人是蠢狒狒.” 相反地,对于某些政策或对方的行动,你仍可以自由表达你的想法、感受,可以改用“我认为、我觉得\对我来说似乎…”等等用语。 “政府无法阻止你思考,可以善用这些词语,来说明这是你的个人观点。”…

Activists Commemorate the 9th World Day Against the Death Penalty

Media Release 10 October 2011 For Immediate Release Singapore:  On Sunday, 9…