A lorry driver, who was part of a traffic incident in 2018, was sentenced to jail for seven weeks and slapped with a two-year driving ban.

On Tuesday (14 January), 59-year-old Teo Seng Tiong was found guilty for causing hurt to a cyclist by rash driving. He was also fined S$500 for failing to make a police report within 24 hours following the Pasir Ris road rage incident.

On 22 December 2018, Teo along with a cyclist, British national Eric Cheung Hoyu, were involved in an altercation. This resulted in Teo intruding into the path of a taxi on his right, hence causing him to swerve left and collided into Cheung.

Last April, the cyclist was fined S$2,800 after he pleaded guilty to two charges of committing mischief by knocking off the side mirror of Teo’s lorry with his hand, and for not cycling in an orderly and careful manner based on the traffic regulations.

A video of the incident were uploaded online and it went viral, with many discussions arised on which party was at fault.

Teo said that he had “swerved instinctively” into the cyclist’s lane because he thought he had hit a taxi.

The lorry driver’s lawyer Chia Boon Teck told the court that his client intends to appeal against both his conviction and sentence.

Pending the appeal, Teo is still out on bail, which was increased by S$1,000 to S$6,000.

Mr Chia emphasised during mitigation that the cyclist played a “leading role” in the road rage incident by inconsiderately hogging the road, intentionally ignoring motorists who were attempting to overtake him.

Apart from that, the lawyer also said that Eric took the law on his own hands by hitting the side mirror of Teo’s lorry.

“Given that the cyclist who caused the entire incident was sentenced only to a fine of S$2,800 for his leading role in the traffic incident, the above sentencing position is fair and just,” argued Mr Chia, in an attempt to ask for a lighter custodial sentence of less than two weeks and a driving ban of below six months for his client.

Prosecution asks for higher sentence

Separately, the prosecution has requested that the jail time to be increased to 10 weeks, three-year driving ban and a fine, pointing out that Teo was the first to show aggression towards the cyclist for blocking his lane.

“He tried to overtake the cyclist despite it being unsafe to do so, and then intimidating the cyclist by driving very close to him. It was in this context that the cyclist struck the accused’s side view mirror,” said Deputy Public Prosecutors Gabriel Choong and Zhou Yang.

They added, “The cyclist’s actions should not be condoned and he has been dealt with in accordance with the law. However, the accused’s retaliation was entirely disproportionate. The damage to the mirror amounted to S$15, but the accused reacted by endangering the cyclist’s life.”

“In balancing the cyclist’s conduct against the accused’s response, no mitigation weight should be accorded on account of provocation, especially given that it was the accused who first drove aggressively.”

Despite asking for stiffer penalties, District Judge Chay Yuen Fatt gave a lower sentence, stating that the prosecution “had not given sufficient consideration to the deliberate and provocative acts of the cyclist in first blocking the accused then breaking the side mirror, notwithstanding that the accused’s reaction was disproportionate”.

Other offences

The prosecution also laid out other offences that Teo had previously committed during the hearing. In the 1990s, Teo was declared guilty for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, committing an obscene act and causing affray.

Additionally, he was also convicted for insulting the modesty of a woman and voluntarily causing hurt, in 2007 and 2012 respectively.

From 1999 to 2015, the court heard that he was guilty of a series of traffic offences which include, speeding, failing to give way to another vehicle, careless driving and failing to conform to a red-light signal.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police should stop saying that permits are required for public assemblies when they have no intention of approving them

“Both of them did not apply for the necessary police permit before…

金管局报警指控网络文章不实

新加坡金融管理局表示,已针对本地时事部落格Statestimes Review在本月5日发布的一篇文章报警,指有关文章不实和含有恶意,诋毁金管局作为金融监管机构的诚信。 有关文章标题为“李显龙成为一马公司弊案关键调查对象”,指马来西亚和新加坡签署了数项不平等协议,作为换取新加坡银行替一马公司资金洗黑钱的代价。 金管局在今早发布的文告指责,上述文章是毫无根据并带有诽谤性质,指文章否定了金管局在外国司法机构还未执法前,过去两年已针对涉及一马公司交易的相关本地银行和银行家,采取前所未有的强力行动。 从未停止一马案调查 “文章提出不实指控,指新加坡在大马政权交替后,才被迫展开一马案调查。”金管局强调,对一马案的调查从未停止。 在2016和2017年度报告发布会上,金管局已阐明,若发现任何与一马弊案有关的新证据,将毫不犹豫展开调查。金管局、总检察署和警察部队在今年6月8日电联合声明,也重申这点。 “自马国上届政府任期,我国执法机构就已和马国、瑞士、卢森堡和美国通力合作。” 金管局也表示,严正看待任何不实指控,维护其作为金融监管机构的诚信。 昨日,新加坡驻马最高专员公署率先向马国媒体澄清,有关总理成为一马弊案关键调查对象的报导不实。    

搀扶跌倒老翁嘘寒问暖 女车长真心服务获赞扬

老翁在巴士上跌倒,女车长立刻趋前搀扶他到座位上,细心询问和检查,并帮忙揉淤青,暖心举止让现场见证的民众感动不已,网民更对这“真心”服务比大拇指。 身在现场的网友Vevin Mok于本月16日在脸书上分享有关事件,指一名老翁在新桥中心(New Bridge Centre)登上33号巴士时,不慎跌倒。 “巴士女车长立刻离席将老人家带到座位坐下,检查老翁是否有受伤,还帮忙揉淤青。她和老翁说话的语气温柔且开朗,就好像是和自己的父亲说话一样。” 网友对女车长的举止所感动,并呼吁网民给她一个赞,毕竟好事都要获得认可。 Vevin也在文中指出,33号巴士的路线不简单,因为会穿过有许多年长者乘车往返的旧住宅区和牛车水。 她表示,有些网友也分享了该女车长曾离席以协助年长者上巴士、帮忙拿包包和微笑问候乘客。“所以我见证的事情并不只发生一次,她的服务是发自真心的。” “女车长爱护年长者的暖心举止,真的是太棒了。如果我的父母登上由这些爱心司机驾驶的巴士,我也会更放心。” 网民呼吁传播正能量 新捷运随后也在脸书帖文指出,暖心女车长是该公司车长Lai…

GE2020 Results: PAP wins Jalan Besar GRC with 65.37% of the vote

Jalan Besar GRC has been officially called for People’s Action Party (PAP)…