Red junglefowls roaming around Sin Ming two weeks ago. (Image by Terry Xu)

When Sin Ming resident filmmaker Mr Jun Chong couldn’t secure a location in the neighbourhood to screen the short film he made about the fowl culling two years ago, he decided to take a proactive approach and go door-to-door to spread the word of his movie.

The 28-year-old told Straits Times (ST) that he is handing out postcards containing details of how people can watch the movie which he is streaming online. He’s passing them out to the 1,2000 households in Sin Ming Court.

Mr Chong, who grew up and lives in Sin Ming estate, was inspired to make the film following the culling of free-range fowls in the neighbourhood back in 2017. He said he wrote the script immediately after the culling.

“Back in 2017, I was very angry that the authorities decided to cull the chickens after receiving only 20 complaints from an estate with nearly 1,200 households.”

“I had an image of an auntie running around the estate, capturing the chickens to save them. So I immediately wrote the script,” he added.

The film stars veteran stage actress Goh Kuat Kim, who plays the woman who provides refuge to the chickens in her estate after she sees enforcement officers rounding up the fowls to keep their numbers down.

Back in January 2017, the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA) received 20 complaints about noise and concerns of bird flu due to the 24 free-roaming chickens in the Sin Ming estate. Those complains called for the birds to be culled but the authorities, which they did.

The move sparked an outcry across Singapore, with people questioning the need for such drastic measures against relatively harmless animals and whether those birds were in fact the endangered red jungle fowls instead of domestic chickens.

Once his movie was completed last October, Mr Chong requested the Thomson Sin Ming Court residents’ committee and Bishan North Community Centre (CC) for permission to premiere it at the open-air amphitheatre in the estate. Unfortunately, the request was rejected.

“They said the film puts the enforcement agencies in a bad light and that they needed to maintain a good working relationship with the authorities. They even asked me to adjust the film to be more neutral,” he said.

In a Facebook post where he shares the entire film, Mr Chong said he was confused by the reply he received.

“I called the CC and explained my point of view – that the film was simply to show how these free-roaming chickens add a ‘kampung’ flavour in a typical residential estate and the significance that they play in the hearts of our residents (including myself),” he explained.

But CC did not budge.

Mr Chong then sought assistance from the Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo who is an MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC.

Ms Teo responded two months later to suggest he screen the film at Bishan North CC. However, she added that the amphitheatre would not be conducive for a film screening.

Mr Chong told ST that it also did not make sense to screen the film at Bishan North because no one from Sin Ming would go all the way there to watch it, based on what some residents told him.

“So I decided to release New Resident online, and I’ve printed postcards to distribute door to door to the residents, so they will know they can watch it online,” he explained.

Mr Chong recounted how several residents came up to him and his crew while filming in July to ensure that they do not capture or harm the free-roaming fowls.

“I spent more time convincing them we were not catching the chickens than on writing the script,” he added.

“This film was made in conjunction with Sin Ming residents, so I want them to be able to see it too,” he said.

Mr Chong told ST he hoped that the film would ignite a conversation about the fowls, between people who want them to be relocated and those who would prefer them to be left alone.

You can watch the 16-minute film on here or on Facebook:

Fowl situation

During a parliamentary session on 2 February 2017 after the Sin Ming incident, Nee Soon MP Louis Ng Kok Kwang asked the Minister of State for National Development Dr Koh Poh Koon about the authorities’ methods in dealing with these creatures, specifically questioning Dr Koh’s description of the birds as ‘chickens’.

Dr Koh said, “Some have suggested that the chickens could be relocated to the wild, for example, in places like in Pulau Ubin or other forested areas. But the chickens in Sin Ming and in most of our urban settings are highly unlikely to be of native stock and are therefore different from our indigenous breed of Red Junglefowl, which is an endangered species known to occur only in Pulau Ubin and the Western Catchment area. ”

However, Mr Ng pointed out: “I have seen the photographs of the chickens or some of them at Sin Ming Avenue. They are indeed a Red Junglefowl. There are two birds there: the domestic chickens and the Red Junglefowl. Just to clarify because AVA had mentioned earlier that the free-ranging chickens seen on mainland Singapore are not the Red Junglefowl. That statement is inaccurate.”

In response, Dr Koh suggested that experts could be asked to conduct genetic studies to determine the exact species of the chickens in question.

It appears nothing came out of that suggestion though, as AVA performed another round of culling in April, this time at Sungei Api Api in Pasir Ris. A flock of 10 birds or more were culled down to just two or three.

Residents were furious that AVA did the culling without even informing or consulting the residents. Again, residents noted that those were the endangered native variety.

In June last year, more complaints of noise by the fowls were made. But this time, residents decided to vote on the issue. A poll was conducted by the Thomson Sin Ming Court residents’ committee (RC) following complaints. The options were either to let the authorities relocate the free-roaming fowls or leave them alone, though no information was given on where the wild birds would be relocated to.

Over 90% out of more than 1,000 residents voted to leave them alone. Submitting their responses to the RC in a voluntary poll, residents decided to keep their feathery friends around.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Government not doing enough say Malays at forum

by Joshua Chiang On Nomination Day for the 2006 General Elections, PAP…

数度拉扯狗绳将狗吊起 男子被判罚款1万元

一名男子数度拉扯狗绳,还不断虐待宠物,强行将狗吊起,更勒住狗的脖子,将其压在地面上,种种行为被拍下,被判罚款1万元。 案情显示,该虐待宠物事件发生于去年2月15日晚上10点,以及同年3月9日傍晚6点左右,位于义顺环路第115A座附近,被告为38岁的男子陈鑫,被指对宠物雌狮子狗蓄意造成伤害,目前面临两项动物和飞禽法令指控。 目击者分别在上述地点两度发生虐狗,并使用手机拍摄下来,并通报当时的农粮兽医局(现被已编入国家公园局),同时也上传到网上,引起许多网民的关注,当局也随即进行调查。 据悉,当局执法人员造访被告住家时,又看见被告与其他宠物狗,并确认它们正是视频中的男子与宠物狗。 经进一步调查后确认当天(2月15日)晚上10点左右,被告正与宠物正在散步,突然猛力拉扯狗绳数次,让宠物狗后退一至两米。 被告解释,当时他的狗一直冲向前,而他则称是为了将它拉回来。 不仅如此,去年3月9日傍晚6点左右,被告又再次对宠物狗暴力虐打,先是踢狗的胸膛,再将狗链把它从原本休息的座位上,吊起来距离50公分的地面,最后在将它吊会原本的位置上,更抓着它的颈部按在位置上长达三秒。 对此,被告也称是为了想要让宠物挪动位置,于是很“小力”将狗压着,但时间很短。而检方则认为,事发当时被告都正在使用手机,并没有给予狗狗太多的关注,所以这样的行为并不合理。 检方表示,目前宠物狗已找到新的栖身之地,也没有形成永久性伤势。 针对此事,被告也于昨日下午认罪,被判罚款1万元,并于一年内不得养宠物。 结果宣判后,被告也提及自己是首次养狗,并不知道自己犯错,还询及领养宠物的人是否曾接受事前训练,避免再次犯错。

It is crucial to the future of Singapore for people to make themselves heard, according to LKY

With all the recent discussions surrounding protests and demonstrations, on whether or…

Face to face with Seelan Palay (Part One)

The first in a series of intimate interviews with people who have made an impact in Singapore’s socio-political scene, The Online Citizen meets up with Seelan Palay to talk about his time in jail, his family and Dr Chee Soon Juan.