It appears that residents of Blocks 115 and 119 at Marsiling Rise will have their prayers answered very soon as the authorities say the blocks will receive lift upgrades.

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan said on his Facebook page today (16 January): “Woke up to the great news that the good people at Blks 115 and 119, Marsiling Drive will be getting their lifts upgraded after a fight of more than 10-years. Congratulations, your hard work paid off!”

He thanked those who signed the online petition the party started demanding for the lifts in those blocks to be upgraded.

“Thanks also to all of you who signed our online petition even though you were not a resident there. That’s how it should be: Singaporeans supporting each other even though issues may not directly affect us. That’s what a community is all about,” he enthused.

Mr Chee added, “When we unite to press the PAP, many things can be done very quickly!”

The lift issue

Over the years, multiple questions from residents and members of parliament were raised over why these blocks, among others, have yet to benefit from the Housing Development Board’s (HDB’s) Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP) which was launched in 2001.

The programme aimed to make the 5,300 affected HDB blocks 100% lift accessible, but by after a few years, about 150 blocks remained with no apparent viable solution.

In 2018, Second Minister for National Development Desmond Lee said that HDB has yet to find solutions to overcome existing constraints in those 150 blocks. He added that about 70 per cent of those blocks are no eligible for lift upgrading due to cost considerations.

Then in 2019, Minister of National Development Lawrence Wong said LUP is still not feasible for the remaining 150 blocks due to high cost or existing technical and site constraints.

Mr Wong also said that the suggestion of sky bridges put forth by MP Gam Thiam Poh (Ang Mo Kio GRC) would need to be studied carefully, adding that it would require extensive structural work which is likely to be very expensive.

SDP leads the charge

Just two days ago (14 January), SDP shared a petition it started calling for HDB to install lifts in Block 115 and 119 Marsiling Rise that serves every floor.

Following that, Member of Parliament of the Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC Ong Teng Koon was quoted by Chinese daily Lianhe Zaobao, saying that the lifts for Block 115 and 119 in Marsiling have not been upgraded because the cost would be too high, repeating the same remarks by the Mr Wong last year.

Mr Ong also explained that the LUP has spending limitations on lift renewals, and the budget that would be required for upgrading the infrastructure of Blocks 115 and 119 is beyond the limit.

However, he also said that he believes the lifts in those blocks will be upgraded, it’s just a matter of time. He noted that MPs have been communicating with the authorities on this issue for many years now, emphasising that those in charge are actively researching options.

Responding to Mr Ong’s comments, SDP countered: “But why must everything be calculated in dollars and cents? What about the safety of the residents especially the elderly, disabled and those with babies?”

On their Facebook post on Wednesday evening (15 January), SDP said residents have told them that they would rather have the lifts than parks or other fancy structures which residents consider as “white elephants”.

“They told us that they have never asked for these so-called amenities and would rather that the money be spent on lift upgrading.” wrote SDP.

SDP also questioned why Mr Ong says that it is only a matter of time before the lifts are upgraded after raising concerns the cost, technical, terrain and construction considerations?

“Have they all suddenly become resolvable now that elections are near?” asked SDP.

Now that Blocks 115 and 119 are getting their lift upgrades, it seems that years of writing to the authorities by MPs went nowhere until SDP pushed for change. A petition by SDP on behalf of the residents achieved, within days, what could not be done for years, as PAP MP Ong had pointed out.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SPF’s clarification on Singaporean’s four-month ordeal in Malaysia, sheds no light but raises more questions

Finally, after one month of probing into Mr Mohan’s four-month ordeal in…

老顾客为旧机场路小贩抱不平

一名常光顾旧机场路小贩中心的老顾客,在脸书上载贴文,表示自己和一名相熟小贩攀谈时,后者告知当前小贩面对的艰难处境。 名为Gary Ho的老顾客在得知职总富食客接管后,社会企业管理模式并没提升小贩的营生,甚至可能扼杀小贩文化,在帖文中他提到,一些老小贩可能不堪管理层强制规定长时间工作,可能就此结业,顾客们再也吃不到他们烹制的到底美食。 以下为Gary Ho英语原文大意: “熟识我的人都知道我有多爱旧机场路小贩中心!我把所有外国朋友都带到这里和牛车水市场。 昨日(22日)我到那里,一名相熟小贩告诉我近期的改革正扼杀小贩中心。职总富食客在接管小贩中心后,让小贩们签署以英语书写的可笑法律文件,而且也没有翻译内容给不谙英语的小贩。当小贩们问起内容写什么,这些人却回答“没什么啦”“签就对了”。小贩告诉我,职总富食客就好像请了一批“收数佬”来处理小贩事宜。 怎么可以没有翻译内容就让小贩们签字??? 小贩也提到,他们必须缴交每年近100元保费,为摊位外的公共空间买保险。 为何要让小贩们为小贩中心投保? 之后,清洁费就从每月约300,飙涨至超过500元。我还小时着小贩就在这里营业了。他们见证清洁费从四元起到80元、100元、到300元,最后到现在超过500元。卖打包食物的摊位,其实根本没有什么碗碟好洗,之前的承包商也会通融为清洁费打折。但是当问到职总管理层是否能折扣,就音讯全无。 我理解成本已提高,但这是否是在牟利?如果之前的承包商收300元就做到,怎么还要起清洁费?…

受不确定性因素影响 今年就职空缺料下滑

人力部今日(20日)指出,鉴于今年的不确定性前景,新加坡今年的就职机会预计将会进一步下滑。 人力部长杨莉明今天在发布该部门2019年就职机会报告后指出,报告显示就职机会数量减少是因为雇主更为谨慎地招聘情绪。 雇主谨慎态度致空缺减少 去年的就职机会只有5万2900个,比2018年的6万3300少了超过一万,但是各个领域,尤其是正在增长的领域,仍然有就业空缺。“主要的工作机会来自信息技术、医疗保健、业务发展以及销售领域。” 杨莉明在脸书上帖文指出,调查发现疫情以及全球经济放缓所影响,得到有关的结果并不令人意外。“2019年的就业机会整体而言较少,但是增长领域仍有很多就业机会。鉴于2020年的不确定性,我们预计就业机会会进一步下滑。” 人力部指出,2019年中有约42巴仙的就职机会,是基于业务形成和扩张而新设立的职位,情况与2018年相似。 增长性领域,包括信息与通信技术、专业服务、金融与保险服务业、批发贸易、以及医疗保健等领域的就职机会比例,比平均水准来得高。而软件、网络和多媒体技术开发人员和系统分析人员、商业和市场销售主管、业务开发经理、护士以及医疗保健助理的市场需求也不断增加。 雇主更看重应聘者经验态度 包括软件、网络和多媒体技术开发人员、商业及市场销售主管在内的PMET职业空缺中,将近一半的雇主更加注重技能、工作经验和态度,而不是学历。 人力部在今天的发布会上说,对于职业空缺,缺乏专业技能也是雇主拒绝聘请的普遍原因。 而非PMET空缺则主要是因为工资和预期不匹配所致。 当局,除了学历,雇主更加注重应聘者的技能、工作经验和态度。…