Earlier this month (2 Jan), Singapore’s second Chief of Defence Force (CDF), retired Lieutenant-General Ng Jui Ping, passed away at the age of 71 due to pancreatic cancer.

LG Ng became Chief of Army in 1990 before serving as Chief of Defence Force from 1992 to 1995, taking over from Winston Choo.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong went to the wake to pay his respect.

On Facebook, PM Lee said that LG Ng was among the inaugural batch of commissioned officers trained locally after answering an advertisement in 1966 to be one of Singapore’s pioneer career soldiers.

“I will remember him most from my own time in the army, when he was first my Commanding Officer, and later when I worked beside him – I learnt much from him as a leader and a colleague,” PM Lee wrote. “He was a valued comrade and friend, who always led by example, and gave his all to serve the nation.”

In a condolence letter to LG Ng’s wife, PM Lee also outlined his close relationship with LG Ng which continued after the latter’s retirement from Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) in 1995. “I am deeply saddened today, not just because Singapore has lost one of its true sons, but also because I have lost a dear friend,” said PM Lee.

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) also issued a statement saying LG Ng had emphasized “leadership by example” where commanders at various levels personally led and executed training. In 1990, he established a Warrant Officer Corps to train, groom and appoint non-commissioned officers to command positions, similar to the officer corps, MINDEF said. He also redefined SAF’s strategies and capabilities to enable an integrated and more effective armed forces, MINDEF added.

LG Ng was accorded a military-assisted funeral.

Media interview in 2019

The late LG Ng gave an interview to the media last April when he was still alive. He shared his thoughts on career succession and post-career within the SAF.

He revealed that he was one of the key architects behind the decision to retire military officers by the age of 50, so as to create career progression in the SAF.

He explained, “If you are 35, it’s your mid-career. You look at your career potential and you assess: Do you stay, or do you move? At that point, you look up and you say, wow, this guy up there is only 48. If they are all going to retire at 65, or 70, I’m going to be stuck here for 20 years. Then, if I truly believe in myself, I quit. Of course, I will quit. Why should I wait 20 years?”

“So now, every three years, you are either among those who move on to the next level, or you retire. And then the 35-year-old is not at all concerned about the ages of all those above him. Because it’s for him to establish that he deserves his promotion to the next tier in three years. As long as he believes he can do that, he stays,” he added.

Lg Ng went on to explain that the SAF doesn’t guarantee anyone a second career after retirement at 50. He said, “You look for it yourself. To a certain extent, people who are scholars would find a second career easier, because the good scholars are also attracted into the Administrative Service.”

“Of course, they can do something else. Some of them go into politics, and so politics becomes their second career – Teo Chee Hean, George Yeo, you know. And some of them, on their own effort, find jobs with Temasek companies. But it’s up to Temasek to accept them… Mindef does not have such powers. It’s between the individual and Temasek,” he emphasized. “The decision-maker is the employer. Mindef has no power to insist. Mindef may recommend, but Mindef cannot insist.”

LG Ng rejects PM Lee’s offer to stay in establishment after retirement

In the media interview, LG Ng also disclosed that he had a meeting with then-DPM Lee Hsien Loong one year before his retirement from SAF.

LG Ng recalled, “Of course, he asked me what I wanted to do next. Was I thinking of a permanent secretary position, a statutory board, ambassadorship?”

“If I had decided that I wanted to become an ambassador, I’m sure the Defence Minister would have called the Foreign Minister and said, our CDF is retiring and wants to be an ambassador, could you consider him?” he continued.

“In any case, I said no, I think it’s fair and ethical that I will look after myself. I said, we’ve just started this system. I’m the first case. So as principal architect, I surely cannot be seen in my second career to be living off the Government.”

“The basis of the second career is that the SAF has trained and groomed a person who is of this calibre, and a person of this calibre should be able to hold his own outside of the SAF,” he explained.

“In my case, I said, I would apply a stricter standard – outside of the Government and Temasek. I think then DPM (Lee) was a bit surprised, but he agreed that if that’s what I wanted, why not. That’s why on my first day of retirement, I was in my own company, August Asia Consulting. And I have never looked back. Since then, I’ve always been in the private sector doing my own projects, putting my own money at risk for capital, and taking the good and the bad that come with that.”

LG Ng thought that it was the right thing for him to do. And when his family asked him why he was on his own and not followed others to join the establishment, he simply replied, “I said I made my own bed, so I must lie in it, surely.”

LG Desmond Kuek and LG Ng Yat Chung choose to stay inside establishment earning millions

Socio-political commentator Simon Lim applauded the late LG for his decision. Lim said in his Facebook post, “We have seen so many former SAF generals parachuted into cushy senior positions in government linked companies, statutory boards, stood for election and ambassadorial position etc. In those wise words of the late LG Ng, I ask why are so many of our former SAF generals not seen to be able to hold their own outside of the SAF, the Government or Temasek?”

“In fact, we need not look too far when big titled generals such as LG Desmond Kuek screwed up big time at SMRT again and again and again. LG Ng Yat Chung couldn’t turn NOL around and sold it off, only for the new French owners CMA CGM to turn it around with a modest profits the very second year. And over at Singapore Press Holdings, staff were retrenched under the leadership of LG Ng Yat Chung but he gets to keep his plum job and his fat salary.”

So, we have 3 LGs. But the late LG Ng who didn’t study at OxBridge chose to forge his own path, unlike LG Desmond Kuek and LG Ng Yat Chung, both with prestigious OxBridge degrees, who chose to remain in the establishment immediately after their retirement from SAF.

After his SAF career, Desmond Kuek served as a Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources for 2 years before being appointed Group CEO of SMRT. He earned millions of dollars in salary from SMRT before leaving in 2018. He is currently the divisional vice-chairman for global wealth management in UBS.

Ng Yat Chung joined Temasek for 4 years after his retirement from SAF. Thereafter he became CEO of NOL for 6 years from 2011 to 2017. Currently he is the CEO of SPH. He has also earned millions of dollars in salary from those organizations linked to the establishment he joined.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

非议社企管理小贩模式 学者“开课”教训环境局

李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,在脸书贴文非议社企管理层管理小贩的手法,也详加分析社企和环境局针对小贩管理上的不合理之处。 帖文中他非议规定小贩最低营业时间的做法,认为小贩已经给足租金,为何还要管他们工作多长时间。 “如果小贩工作几小时就有足够收入,那为何还要强迫他们营业至少八小时?社企这是在进行哪门子的斯大林式经济?” 他相信小贩也能估算和比较,多做一小时的边际收入和成本,来决定该营业多久。那么何以见得社企管理层就比小贩们更了解行情,可以指点小贩该营业多久? 再者,环境局一再强调要打造充满生机的小贩中心,但为何要把达成这目标的重担,非得让小贩来承担?营造小贩中心活力是集体利益,但假设一些时段顾客少,社企却非得要小贩拉长营业时间,结果成本和压力还是落在小贩身上。 这种做法也是不经济、违反伦理的。市场是由需求产生供应,也即是如果晚上或凌晨有足够需求,小贩觉得生意做得过,就算不逼他们,也会自己开档做生意。很少会有供应来制造需求的。 利用小贩超时工作来营造市场生机 “简言之,市场有活力固然社群得益,但是需有人(如小贩)承担他的成本。假如社企管理层认为营造生机之法,乃是拉长小贩营业时间,那么就应该给小贩相对的报酬超时营业,而不是设定最低营业时间。” 至于为何以上做法违反伦理?是因为这形同把小贩工具化、利用他们来营造市场生机、或者为了达成申遗的手段。小贩的存在不是为了让城市活化。他们当小贩就是为了营生,如果要他们做得更多,让小贩自行选择,和给他们适当的报酬。 他也认为如今环境局和社企管理层对小贩的要求已经偏离初衷,对他们施加太多互相矛盾的政策目标。 反对一味压低小贩食物售价 “设立小贩中心一开始的目的,是为了解决公共卫生问题,可负担食物并不是主要目的。当初,为了鼓励街边小贩迁入小贩中心,还津贴了他们的租金,小贩们才有能力提供价格廉宜的美食。所以,便宜的食物价格,是当年政策的间接产物。”…

卫生部集团总监:不因无力支付被拒 国民均能获妥善医疗照护

“我才意识到,原来病患从私人医生被转介到政府医院看专科医生可能无法享有补贴,只有综合诊所转介的病人才有资格享用。” 网民Tan Keong Boon周二(10日)发表文章《医疗费用:帮助那些无法享用补贴的人们》到海峡时报论坛中,质问为何立国一代不能享有补贴,如果是从私人诊所转介到政府医院。 文章表示,大多数受雇人士都可以到与公司合作的家庭科医生,其中是因为可以享用与雇主共同支付,即使在退休后,他们在没有雇主的共同支付下,仍然需要和同一位医生继续跟进病情。 对此,作者表示是否可将补贴扩大至私人医生转介的病患。 建国立国一代转介专科均有补贴 卫生部集团总监Chan Beng Seng,今日于《海峡时报》论坛上否认此说法,表示当建国一代与立国一代被转介到专科时,均有资格获得补贴。不仅仅是综合诊所转介的,获得社保援助计划(CHAS)的私人医生也可以获得补贴。 换句话说,只有社保援助计划(CHAS)批准的私人家庭科医生在转介给政府医院时,才能获得补贴,那也算是半政府经营的诊所之一。 卫生部表示,“在专科,病人可以享有高达75巴仙的门诊服务补贴,而建国一代与立国一代则可享用额外的服务与药物补贴费用。而早前由私人家庭科医生的病患,无论是建国一代还是立国一代,都可告知专科,再由工作人员申请将他们转入补贴服务中。”…

维文访马 两国总检察长续磋商水价议题

新马水价问题随着新加坡外交部长维文医生出访马来西亚,和马来西亚外交部长赛夫丁会面后有了新的发展,两国总检察长将继续磋商,了解彼此立场。 维文出访马来西亚,昨日在布城和赛夫丁会面,谈及两国最近热炒的水供课题。 联席记者会上,维文表示,对于有没有权利检讨水价一事,两国持有不同看法,但是双方都同意让两国的总检察长继续会谈,以便更加了解彼此在1962年新马水供协议下有没有检讨水价的立场。 赛夫丁则表示,秉持着“寻找友好前进道路”的理念,两国总检察长将再次展开磋商。 他补充说,两国将通过具建设性方法解决双边课题,努力促进两国外交关系,寻找能够取得双赢的友好解决方案,平等互相尊重地拉近双边关系。 他表示,这是马国在会谈中秉持的根本精神,并且会持续下去。 同意坐下商讨了解立场 维文随后在接受新加坡媒体访问时指出,两国总检察长将在近期内会面,但是目前两国并没有就水价课题达成任何协议。 他指出,双方目前只是同意坐下来谈,解释、讨论后,进一步了解彼此的立场。 他随后也访问了马国交通部长陆兆福和经济事务部长阿兹敏。 在1962年新马水供协议下,双方可在协定签署25年后检讨协定条款,但是马来西亚在1987年选择了不调整水价,因此新加坡指马来西亚已经失去检讨水价的权利,至今不变立场。 马来西亚则认为,两国是在协定签署25年后检讨,但是并不是只能在第25年进行检讨。…