Connect with us

Current Affairs

摄24沐浴视频及裙底照 前耶鲁国大生辩称能减压

Published

on

和五名女学生同住校园宿舍的26岁耶鲁—国大(Yale-NUS)高材生,被指控拍摄四名同学的24个沐浴视频,还拍下女同学的裙底照,只因为这样做能够减少学习压力。

在辩方成功提出申请后,法院已经下令禁止在媒体上公布被告和受害者的名字。

在去年的听证会上,辩方表示,已经确认了被告和受害者身份,他们都来自很小的社交圈子。法官认为没有必要协助隐瞒被告身份,然而警察检控官表示,为了保护受害者身份,当局接受有关的禁令,而法院才下达“禁口令”。

被告昨日(1月13日)承认八项侮辱女性尊严的指控,另外有16项控状仍在考量中。

根据法庭文件指出,被告在犯罪时仍是一名学生,干案时段落在2017年8月至2018年5月,以及2019年1月至3月之间。

被告与五名女同学同住,各别有自己的卧室,但是共用一间浴室,而他的罪行于2019年3月偷拍一名22岁的受害者沐浴时,被揭发。

被发现后立刻删除手机记录

当受害者在沐浴时,被告站在浴室门前,将手机以倾斜的角度偷偷拍摄女子沐浴。

控方指出,受害者当时听到厕所外面有声音,并在门缝隙下看见一双腿,抬起头就看见对准她的手机摄像头,因此大声呼叫当时也在宿舍内的男朋友,并围着毛巾跑出浴室。

被告在被发现时立刻跑到客厅的沙发,删除了受害者的沐浴视频,以及其他的偷拍视频,还清空了已删除的文件夹,并取下手机的黑色手机套,以免被识破。

受害者和其男友曾问被告,是否有看见任何人进入宿舍,并且要求检查被告的手机,但是都一无所获。

为了消除自己的嫌疑,被告就告知这对情侣有另一名室友进入宿舍,并建议受害者向校方报告有关事件。

他甚至指出,当时在另一个楼层参加派对的人,可能透过未上锁的大门进入宿舍。被告甚至陪着受害者情侣到相关楼层,记录派对参与者的身份。被告随后谎称要去教补习,就匆匆离开了。

向女舍友坦诚却谎称是初犯

受害者随后通过学院院长助理,向校园保安报告有关事件,校园保安则指出,在宿舍中、该楼层附近和楼梯间都没有安装闭路电视摄像机。

受害者之后在晚上11时,告诉被告他将报警,被告当时就紧张了,连忙召集所有住在一起的女同学,坦诚自己是偷拍者,但是却骗她们自己只是初犯。

被告也表示他当时并没有激活录制视频的功能,所以没有拍摄视频。

女生们相信了被告,因此决定不报警。

然而在事发的10天后,受害者和被告都参加由教会组织的聚会,女生父母和被告父母都知道此事件,双方安排见面后,受害者于3月13日报警。

警方当天就到被告家中进行突击搜查,没收了其手机、iPad、MacBook和流动硬盘。

透过法证检查,警方寻回遭被告删除的不雅视频,发现被告共进行了最少24次偷拍。被偷拍沐浴的受害者,除了同住的四名女同学,被告也在教室内偷拍身份不详女学生的裙底照。

被告的代表律师指出,被告录制女住户的沐浴视频,有助于减轻他的学习压力。他指出,被告在录制视频后,会将一部分储存到与MacBook连接的硬盘中,而大部分视频会自动上传到他的云端账户中。

被告表示,每当他感到压力大时,就会透过手机重看有关视频。

法官宣布展延缓刑,并将于1月31日宣判。

侮辱女性尊严罪名一旦成立,每项控状都可能导致不超过一年的监禁、罚款或两者兼施。

耶鲁—国大表示已于2019年10月底,将被告开除学籍,因为他已经违反了该校的行为守则,对校园社区构成安全风险。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending