Photo: asiaone.com

With the announcement of major regulation changes by the Singapore Exchange (SGX), hundreds of listed companies can afford to focus more on their long-term goals as well as save money and time.

On 9 Jan (Thursday), SGX announced that the requirement that companies with a market capitalisation exceeding S$75 million must report their earnings every quarter will be abolished. However, this does not mean that no information is to be disclosed. Rather, SGX stressed that significant developments and information must be disclosed without delay.

Beginning from 7 Feb, only riskier firms will have to provide the quarterly reports as well as firms whose auditors deem as risky. As of now, close to 600 of the 850 listed firms are obligated to file quarterly financial reports, a task these companies consider as costly, onerous and time-inefficient. With the new rule in place, SGX Regulation (SGX Regco) will identify these 100 or so firms who will need to submit their quarter financial reports. As for the remaining companies, they will only need to submit their financial reports every six months.

“Regulation needs to be more targeted, even surgical, so as to ensure compliant companies aren’t overburdened while non-compliant companies receive more attention… Internationally, there is a shift away from quarterly reporting, and this is to allow companies to focus on the long term.” SGX RegCo chief executive Tan Boon Gin stated.

This change in rule is similar to what Britain and the European Union have done by abolishing quarterly reporting due to the high cost and time commitments to prepare.

However, there are still measures particularly for companies that are considered to be risky. Mr Tan added that, “Some companies face immediate challenges and need to focus on the short term to solve their problems. These are the companies that should be made to do quarterly reporting. Size-based quarterly reporting does not achieve this outcome.”

At this, Ho Meng Kit, the chief executive of Singapore Business Federation shared the same sentiment that “SBF has always held the view that rules and regulations should not overburden businesses and, as result, divert their attention from their main focus of value creation.”

Neelamani Muthukumar, chief financial officer of Olam group also agreed that “It is not just about saving cost, but time. We are operating in so many countries, and quarterly reporting takes up a lot of senior management time.”

In addition to this, company actions that affect stakeholders must be disclosed without delay. These actions include providing significant financial assistance or interested-person transactions.

With stricter disclosure regulations, companies will need to announce immediately and obtain shareholder approval with regards to a broader range of significant acquisitions. These significant transactions will also have to undergo independent valuation. Added to this, trade-sensitive information that can sway investors’ selling, holding and buying of securities must be disclosed. Not only that, companies need to also disclose changes that are likely to influence short-term earning prospects.

In light of this, Mr Tan stressed that “There is currently a misconception in some parts of the market that companies only need to disclose information that has an impact on share price. We are making it clear that this is not the case.” Matters related to rights issues will require disclosure of more information.

Echoing what Mr Tan said, David Gerald, the president of Securities Investors Association (Singapore) further added that “Companies embracing transparency and accountability to their stakeholders should not find the amendments of the rules to be onerous…Companies should embrace the spirit of the law, and not just the letter of the law. This would ultimately create more trust with their investors and shareholders.”

The central bank, Monetary Authority of Singapore also chimed in that “Ultimately, what is important is that companies and their boards must seek to conduct meaningful and regular engagement with their stakeholders, keeping them well-informed through timely, pertinent and high-quality disclosures.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dollar rally takes a pause

By Margaret Yang, CMC Markets Thai baht and Korean won lead EM…

Sparkletots教职员成攻击对象 陈慧玲:互相指责非明智之举

自凤山Sparkletots幼儿园出现新感染群后,该校的教职员几乎就成为网络攻击对象,凤山国会议员陈慧玲强调,在对抗冠状病毒19战役中,互相指责并非明智之举。 陈慧玲昨天在脸书上帖文指出,自人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下,坐落在勿洛北2巷的126座组屋的凤山Sparkletots幼儿园爆出首宗冠毒病例后,对教师、PCF和教育部的评论就很多。 她澄清,首名确诊的教师(第516病例)并没有出国旅行,而且家庭成员也没有被感染,在学校是更是没有出现任何症状。 她在今日(26日)的后续更新中也指出,自3月24日以来,该幼儿园中确诊的校长和教职员都在专用设施内进行隔离,就连和校长一起出席培训活动的教师也进行了居家隔离。 截至目前为止,已经有19起确诊病例和凤山Sparkletots幼儿园有关。 陈慧玲在帖文中指出,关闭幼儿园是为了遏止疫情在社区扩散,为了儿童和社区安全所作的正确决定。 她强调,所有PCF幼儿园在安全和卫生方便,必须采取必要的防疫措施,尤其是在和幼童互动交流上。 除了为幼儿园教职员辩护,她也强调,没有人会故意做出危及幼童安全的事项。“该幼儿园的父母现在应该很好地了解老师们,我相信他们已经看到教职员们如何照顾和养育这些孩童。” 陈慧玲重申,感染冠毒并非教师(第516病例)的过错,因为教师自己也受到感染,而且实在不知不觉中。 她鼓励家长们在接下来的数天关注儿童健康,而工作人员也会每天电联孩子两次。 帖文的最后,她呼吁人们继续努力防疫,“我们需要全力以赴。那些接获居家隔离和隔离禁令的人们,请为其他人着想,留在当地并负起社会责任”。

傅海燕称NETS争议广告无恶意,但“美丽求求你”讽刺视频不妥

今年7月底,闹得沸沸扬扬的电子支付平台NETS广告风波引起热议,除了广告公司和艺人周崇庆致歉,网红“美丽求求你”(Preetipls)也因为拍摄讽刺视频,被警方介入调查,并发出24个月有条件警告。 昨日(10日),文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕在一项活动上重提此事,她表示并不觉得NETS广告有任何冒犯之意,反而是网红“美丽求求你“的讽刺视频使用侮辱性语言, 行为实属不妥。 傅海燕昨日受邀至义顺星烁初级学院参与种族和谐资源中心OnePeople.SG的第五届模拟联合国大会,在对话会上,学生重提争议广告。 对此,傅海燕坦言她个人认为对于周崇庆所饰演的角色并没有感到任何问题,并表示周崇庆当时只是在演好反串的角色,而且他所扮演的人物并具贬损意味,只是在描绘一个“普通人”的角色,如家庭主妇或是工人。 指基层领导反映广告未冒犯印裔 她补充道,针对此事,询问大多数基层领导,包括印度人,均不认为广告具有冒犯之意。 傅海燕表示,NETS广告是想向公众传达一个讯息,即付费平台能够为所有人使用,无论是何种背景、种族的人。 不过,针对网红“美丽求求你“的视频,她则认为“是不同的问题”,因为视频内,网红使用了污秽的语言,指责了广告里的艺人不敏感。 她也解释,网红“美丽求求你”也曾出现取笑华人新年的视频,这样的做法也被视为是不敏感的行为。 “美丽求求你讽刺华人新年” “如果我们放过视频,不采取任何行动,在各族间盛怒之下,万一华人也开始采取类似的侮辱性视频,这对种族间的关系又会产生什么影响?”她解释。…

WP’s Yee Jenn Jong rebuts Lawrence Wong, says desire for checks and balances has always been present

In a lengthy Facebook post today (21 July), Workers’ Party’s Yee Jenn…