Photo: asiaone.com

With the announcement of major regulation changes by the Singapore Exchange (SGX), hundreds of listed companies can afford to focus more on their long-term goals as well as save money and time.

On 9 Jan (Thursday), SGX announced that the requirement that companies with a market capitalisation exceeding S$75 million must report their earnings every quarter will be abolished. However, this does not mean that no information is to be disclosed. Rather, SGX stressed that significant developments and information must be disclosed without delay.

Beginning from 7 Feb, only riskier firms will have to provide the quarterly reports as well as firms whose auditors deem as risky. As of now, close to 600 of the 850 listed firms are obligated to file quarterly financial reports, a task these companies consider as costly, onerous and time-inefficient. With the new rule in place, SGX Regulation (SGX Regco) will identify these 100 or so firms who will need to submit their quarter financial reports. As for the remaining companies, they will only need to submit their financial reports every six months.

“Regulation needs to be more targeted, even surgical, so as to ensure compliant companies aren’t overburdened while non-compliant companies receive more attention… Internationally, there is a shift away from quarterly reporting, and this is to allow companies to focus on the long term.” SGX RegCo chief executive Tan Boon Gin stated.

This change in rule is similar to what Britain and the European Union have done by abolishing quarterly reporting due to the high cost and time commitments to prepare.

However, there are still measures particularly for companies that are considered to be risky. Mr Tan added that, “Some companies face immediate challenges and need to focus on the short term to solve their problems. These are the companies that should be made to do quarterly reporting. Size-based quarterly reporting does not achieve this outcome.”

At this, Ho Meng Kit, the chief executive of Singapore Business Federation shared the same sentiment that “SBF has always held the view that rules and regulations should not overburden businesses and, as result, divert their attention from their main focus of value creation.”

Neelamani Muthukumar, chief financial officer of Olam group also agreed that “It is not just about saving cost, but time. We are operating in so many countries, and quarterly reporting takes up a lot of senior management time.”

In addition to this, company actions that affect stakeholders must be disclosed without delay. These actions include providing significant financial assistance or interested-person transactions.

With stricter disclosure regulations, companies will need to announce immediately and obtain shareholder approval with regards to a broader range of significant acquisitions. These significant transactions will also have to undergo independent valuation. Added to this, trade-sensitive information that can sway investors’ selling, holding and buying of securities must be disclosed. Not only that, companies need to also disclose changes that are likely to influence short-term earning prospects.

In light of this, Mr Tan stressed that “There is currently a misconception in some parts of the market that companies only need to disclose information that has an impact on share price. We are making it clear that this is not the case.” Matters related to rights issues will require disclosure of more information.

Echoing what Mr Tan said, David Gerald, the president of Securities Investors Association (Singapore) further added that “Companies embracing transparency and accountability to their stakeholders should not find the amendments of the rules to be onerous…Companies should embrace the spirit of the law, and not just the letter of the law. This would ultimately create more trust with their investors and shareholders.”

The central bank, Monetary Authority of Singapore also chimed in that “Ultimately, what is important is that companies and their boards must seek to conduct meaningful and regular engagement with their stakeholders, keeping them well-informed through timely, pertinent and high-quality disclosures.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

非法采砂令东南亚各国付出环境代价

全球每年对建筑材料的需求量达到300至400亿吨,其中砂石就占了半数,是仅次于水源,人类开采、使用最多的天然资源。 近五年,中国和印度大兴土木,中国国内建设发展迅速,仅一年就铺设了12万6千公里的大道。对于砂石的需求量大,仅2011至2014年,其混凝土建材用料总和相当于美国在整个20世纪的用量。 当这些国家内的砂石供不应求,促成了国际砂石的贸易。许多国家包括新加坡,都有向泰国,缅甸,柬埔寨,印尼和马来西亚等国,进口砂石,然而其中有也有来自非法采砂的供应。 在斯里兰卡,挖沙造成环境破坏,挖沙也拉低水平面,污染饮水源;挖砂留下一坑坑死水,引起霍乱肆虐。 2014年,沙石占了全球采集矿产的85巴仙。暴增需求量推高砂石价格,鼓励非法挖砂活动。每年采砂总值500亿英镑,在砂石稀缺的地方,每平方米砂石售价可高达62英镑。 有人或许会问,既然中东和沙哈拉沙漠拥有大片砂石,为何非得用河砂或海砂?原因在于沙漠的砂经过长期风化摩擦变得非常圆润无棱,相对下海砂河砂则更容易与混凝土完美融合。即便是杜拜的摩天高楼,建材也不来自周边沙漠,用的砂石却是进口自远方的澳洲。 黑心采砂不在乎环境问题 如果从偏远内陆河床或小岛沙滩,就能采集到源源不绝的砂石,为何要花钱向合法砂矿买砂? 砂石有价致使这些黑心商家铤而走险,挖取砂石谋取无本暴利,根本不在乎对环境造成的破坏,甚至挖掉整座岛、一系列的岛屿,也在所不惜。 在印度,有环境记者因为尝试揭发非法挖砂而丧命。基于可降低成本,一些进口国也鲜少过问砂石的来源是否合法。 中国对于南中国海的主权扩张,砂石的作用也少不了:用以建设可驻军的人造岛屿。 新加坡,世界最大的砂石进口国,进口来自印尼、大马、柬埔寨和泰国等地,大部分为非法采集的砂石,用以填海拓展国土面积达20巴仙。…

新、柬总理同意不再“揭开旧伤疤”

李显龙总理和柬埔寨总理洪森一致同意,本着维护两国外交关系精神,同意放下重提过去问题,不再“揭开旧伤疤”(not to scratch old wounds)。 我国总理在周末前往泰国曼谷,出席第34届东盟峰会,期间也会见柬埔寨总理。 根据《高棉时报》报导,柬埔寨外交部长布拉索昆(Prak Sokhonn)在一份声明中指出,新加坡和柬埔寨两国领导同意不再追究旧问题,以免伤及两国关系。 “两国领导都意识到,对于过去事件存有不同看法,也没人能改变过去的事,不过,清楚认识不再刮开过去的旧伤疤造成痛苦,是很重要的。” 柬埔寨当年率先承认新加坡独立 他也指出,当年在新加坡脱离马来西亚后,柬埔寨是第一个承认新加坡独立的国家。 李显龙在曼谷出席为期两天的亚细安峰会时,在场边分别会晤越南总理阮春福、洪森,也会见了泰国首相巴育和印尼总统佐科。…

Goh Jin Hian resigns from board of Swiss-based crypto bank Seba amid lawsuit by IPP’s judicial managers

Dr Goh Jin Hian has left the board of Swiss-based crypto bank…

Are Singapore banks transferring interest rate risks to consumers?

by Paul Ho (iCompareLoan.com) OCBC follows hot on the heels of DBS and UOB…