The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has pointed out that the Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo’s decision to reject the party’s correction directions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) without providing any grounds is a “cop-out”.

The SDP’s statement on Monday (6 Jan) is in response to an earlier statement released by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) which said that Ms Teo has refused SDP’s application to cancel the correction directions issued on 14 Dec last year on three online postings. She said that the application does not provide sufficient grounds for the cancellation.

However, in the MOM statement on 6 Jan, Ms Teo did not elaborate on how SDP’s application didn’t provide sufficient grounds.

Based on the MOM’s lack of explanation, SDP said on its website on Monday that it is “not a rational answer” as the party had submitted a “detailed account – including analysing MOM’s own statistics – of the reasons for the statements in our posts”.

The party also included the full document which they sent to MOM on their website. SDP had earlier submitted its application on 3 Jan to cancel the three correction directions issued by MOM under POFMA.

Besides this, in the party’s statement on Monday, SDP also hit back at Ms Teo for not being able to give an explanation for rejecting SDP’s application despite having the time to do so.

“Minister Josephine Teo, despite having the entire Ministry and its officials at her disposal with two full working days and an entire weekend to refute our specific arguments, has refused or been unable to do so. This is telling,” it wrote.

It added, “Replying that the ‘Minister has therefore decided to refuse your Application’ is not an answer, it is a cop-out.”

SDP also highlighted that the People’s Action Party (PAP) threw “accusations against its opponents but refuses to substantiate its arguments when rebutted with official data”.

“This is hardly the kind of leadership Singaporeans should expect or deserve. It is an unfortunate but very real comment about the calibre of the PAP’s 4G leaders,” it explained.

It continued, “Using the law to allege the SDP as posting ‘false statements of fact’ and then refusing to back-up its allegation with data when challenged is clear demonstration of how far Singapore’s political standards have deteriorated.”

Due to MOM’s non-answer, SDP said that it has taken the step to pursue the matter in court.

Background

Last month, MOM issued three correction directions to SDP for three online postings, alleging that the statements made regarding employment in Singapore were false.

MOM has asked the opposition party to carry a correction notice stating that two of its Facebook posts and an article on its website contain a misleading graphic and false statement of facts.

Following that, SDP complied with the request and added a correction note to both of the Facebook posts as well as the article.

However, on 2 January (Thursday), SDP refuted MOM’s claims and penned a detailed statement on its website about the issues it has with the directives.

In its statement, SDP said that the party’s statements in the three posts which MOM issued the correction directions, were indeed true and correct.

In fact, the party cited statistics published by MOM itself to prove what Ms Teo deemed wrong in the correction directions were actually true.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP’s planned power transfers “antithetical to democratic systems”, says SDP chief Chee Soon Juan

The People’s Action Party (PAP)’s planned power transfers is “antithetical to democratic…

DBS/POSB first in Singapore to provide instant approval for credit cards & DBS cashline via MyInfo

DBS Bank launched a new online application service leveraging the national platform…

2017温室气体总排放量5250万吨 工业占六成;建筑、家户居次

卫生部、环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士周一在国会表示,来自建筑与家庭用户的空调排放量,占总排放量相当大的比例。 许连碹回应马西岭-油池集选区议员王鼎昆的相关质询,表示2017年,新加坡的温室气体总排放量就已达5250万吨,其中楼宇与家户的排放量占了19巴仙,仅次于占六成排放量的工业领域。 此外,14巴仙的排放量则来自陆路交通,而在废物能源发电厂焚化城市废物约占3巴仙。 她续指,新加坡一直致力于减少排放量,为此,还于今年实施了碳税。同时规定所有新建筑物,以及进行重大翻新建筑均需达到《建筑控制法》的基本标准。此外,建设局也提出建筑业主或发展商提高能源效率,采取更高效的冷却系统以替代空调需求。 除了针对建筑,许连碹也提出由国家环境局所提出的两项计划,例如强制性能源标签(Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme,简称MELS)以及最低能源效率標準(Minimum Energy Performance Standards,简称MEPS),以减低家庭用户的排放量。 MELS指以能源标签来为消费者提供更多环保的选择,若大空调获有五个打勾,证明是最具环保的空调,鼓励消费者选择更环保的空调。…

英兰妮为唯才是举背书 为何不谈德才兼备?

上周四(18日),总理公署部长英兰妮席由国大文学暨社会科学院社会服务研究中心主办,探讨如何援助低收入家庭。期间她表示,第四代政府领导班子的任务,是为国人在每个人生阶段创造机会,确保一个人的成就不取决于出身。 英兰妮兼任财政部及教育部第二部长。她说,不平等和社会流动问题早在1965年的“新加坡独立宣言”中就已提到。不同的是当年大家一样穷,随着经济发展,不同收入的家庭累积资源不均,大家因此关注底层孩子的起跑点会越来越落于人后,妨碍社会流动。 不过,本地中文媒体未提及英兰妮针对“唯才是举”(meritocracy)阐述的看法。本地英语媒体都有报导,英兰妮为唯才是举制背书,认为重新审视唯才是举制不是正确的做法。 记者节译刊载于《海峡时报》的英兰妮致辞稿,在演讲中英兰妮指出,唯才是举根据个人表现能力委任职务,能遏制贪腐和裙带关系,如果废除掉唯才是举制度,就等同邀请那些弊端腐蚀国家的体制。 “每个人都想达成最佳成就” “哪个父母不想孩子成龙成凤?学生们也有自己的理想抱负。每一代人都希望能达致最佳的成就,阻止他们是不对的。” 英兰妮辩护,问题的关键并不是唯才是举制,而是虽然国家和政府已经尽力提供平等机会,但是来自低收入和弱势背景的群体,仍难以跻身获得这些机会。 “所以,我们的方针不应该是为往上爬设顶限;要缩减鸿沟让大家可以一起向上,应改善那些较弱势一群的机遇、提供充分的机会。让唯才是举制发挥作用。” 她补充,与此同时也需要有多元管道来追求事业和成就,确保持续的社会流动。“有些人脚步较快,有些较慢;有者可能走相似的道路,有者走较少走的小径。在他们自身的努力,如果需要政府或他人的支持下,大家最终都能取得好的结果–当然不一定是同样的成果。” 所以,政府的措施是双重的,英兰妮强调政府一方面继续加强对少数群体的支持,其次则继续建设在每个人生阶段“充满机遇的社会”。 政治精英对唯才是举制爱不释手 新加坡的政治精英始终舍不得唯才是举制。有多少年来,我们奉唯才是举之名,精英群体都被被行销成有才干、有智慧、有表现绩效的精英,因为他们闪亮的奖学金、受过英语教育、世家背景和一大串的奖项和(军事)资历,就更容易被纳入精英圈子中。…