The Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) is still deliberating, said Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing in Parliament on Monday (6 Jan).

Responding on behalf of the Prime Minister to a question by Worker’s Party chief Pritam Singh, Mr Chan added that the EBRC report will be presented to parliament and released to the public once the committee has completed its work.

In September, the Elections Department (ED) announced that the EBRC had been convened by the PM on 1 August and is “in the midst of deliberations”. The report, once released, will detail the electoral boundaries for the upcoming general elections and is generally a sign that elections are close.

The committee is charged with looking into population changes in various wards and recommending changes to existing group representation constituencies (GRC) and single-member constituencies (SMC).

In its statement in September, the ED noted that the committee has been directed by the PM to also look at further reducing the average size of the current 16 GRCs and increase the total number of SMCs from the current 13.

That’s in line with what Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in Parliament back in 2016 about how the next general election will see smaller GRCs and more SMCs. He said at the time, that the GRC system introduced in 1988 is good and should be maintained, but emphasised that a right balance should be struck between big and small GRCs and between the number of GRCs and SMCs.

PM Lee added that smaller GRCs would foster a closer connection between residents and their Members of Parliaments (MP) while SMCs give MPs a more direct responsibility for what happens in their constituency.

Though there’s no set timeline for when the report has to be released, historically, the time between the formation of the EBRC to the date of the report being released ranges from two to four months. And the time between the report being releasedbasically when the updated boundaries are announcedto the actual date of elections is about two months.

This time, however, the EBRC was formed over five months ago and still, no report.

One concern about this timeline is that it gives opposition parties little time to walk the ground because they can only be sure about where they’re contesting once the boundaries are announced. And we know there’s usually only about two months from the time the report is released to the time elections are held.

One example is the Joo Chiat SMC which was absorbed into the Marina Parade GRC. This change was announced just a month before Parliament was dissolved, leaving the contesting opposition party with little time to react.

Political observers have pointed out that this is one way the ruling party has maintained its overwhelming advantage over the oppositionby ensuring that they, the opposition, cannot commit to a single ward because of the potential changes from redrawing of the electoral boundaries.

The country’s next general elections have to be held by April 2021.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国会通过终身护保和长期护理法案 明年起30-40岁国人强制加入终身护保

国会在昨日三读通过《终身护保和长期护理法案》,协助重度残障者应付长期护理开销。 明年起,年龄介于30-40岁的首批国人,将强制加入终身护保计划(CareShield Life);1979年或之前出生的国人,可在2021年中之后,选择是否参与。 卫生部长颜金勇声称,社会可通过终身护保和乐龄健保(ElderShield)来分担风险,资助长期护理成本是大家共同的责任。 在终身护保计划下,只要受保人在日常活动中的六项(冲凉、进食、走动、移动、更衣和如厕),有三项无法自理,每月可获得一笔现金应付长期护理开销直至康复或离世。 终身护保将交由公积金局和护联中心管理;此外,政府也将在2021年,从三家私人保险业者手中接管130万份乐龄健保保单。 事实上,当政府推出终身护保计划,已有不少团体和民间,都呼吁能降低重度伤残资格,即把无法自理日常活动从三项降至两项。 2017年仅6.6巴仙长者重度伤残 在去年连氏基金长期护理研究报告中,就提及在2017年,只有6.6巴仙长者—约3万4千人面临严重伤残情况。这意味着,有大部分人都被排除在符合申请赔付的范围外。 对此,报告建议可改为根据有多少项日常起居无法自理,分等级给与相对的赔付,以此把保障范围也扩大至一些身患一定程度残障的国人。 在昨日的国会辩论中,亦有不少议员提出上述疑问。不过卫生部仍认为,降低索赔条件,或增加赔付额,也会导致受保国人每月需支付更高的保费。 此前,由于终身护保对女性征收更高保费,也引起民间热议,但在去年卫生部高级政务部长许连碹说,让女性缴付更高的终身护保保费是困难的决定,但政府必须这么做,确保计划可以持续。…

COVID-19 vaccine: Russia’s hastened vaccine trial sparks controversy, Indonesia commences clinical trial of China-made vaccine, UK partners with Novavax

The world is anticipating the availability of a suitable COVID-19 vaccine soon…

李玮玲:父亲很清楚自己签了什么

总理弟弟李显扬,在两天前发文强调自己和妻子,在已故建国总理李光耀决定遗嘱恢复均等份额的决定中,未扮演任何角色,且李显龙也获得均等份额。 这次轮到姐姐李玮玲,在脸书发文指出,不管是最后遗嘱还是遗嘱附录,父亲一直都是拿主意的人,但哥哥李显龙和总检察长认为李显扬夫妇涉及催促拟定的过程。 “但时间都是我父亲说了算: 好,不要等柯金梨,誊写之,然后我会在林学芬事务所或其他律师事务所律师的见证下签署。” 李玮玲称,李光耀曾告知她有意恢复2011年的遗嘱,只待有人见证。他要事情能非常及时的跟进,是哪位律师他无所谓。 李显龙在宣誓声明中称无法证明李光耀知悉拆除条款重新加入最终遗嘱,但李玮玲指出,实则父亲每一页都读过,且在每页下方签字,包括有拆除(故居)条款的下方。 “两周后李光耀再重读遗嘱,然后起草并执行有关遗嘱附录。” 她认为,父亲很清楚他签了什么,而其他的说法都难以置信。 相信她是意指此前纪律审裁庭,在对林学芬的审裁报告中指李光耀受误导,在李显扬夫妇的合谋下签下遗嘱。 审裁庭指林学芬未回避利益冲突,也未向李光耀详细解释遗嘱内容及前后差异。 审裁庭认为,当时年迈体弱的李光耀,是被他所信任的李显扬夫妇误导,才仓促签下遗嘱。 但李玮玲在23日则发文抨击,直言上述审裁庭的裁决“拙劣”(travesty)。…

Prof Paul Tambyah addresses public concerns on COVID-19 vaccines in his latest Facebook live session

In Part 2 of the ‘Ask Paul Anything‘ session live-streamed on his Facebook…